The Ceasefire Everyone’s Talking About, And Why No One Believes It
A fragile peace declared, bombs still falling — why the world isn’t buying into the latest Israel–Iran ceasefire.
*I was scrolling through the news at 4:17 AM when I saw the headline. “Trump Declares Ceasefire Between Israel and Iran.” I blinked. Re-read it. Then laughed out loud. Not because peace isn’t welcome but because no one really believes it’s real.
Twelve Days of Hell
In just under two weeks, the Middle East spiralled into a nightmare few could’ve predicted. The Israel–Iran conflict escalated with missile strikes, air raids, cyberattacks, and chilling footage of fireballs lighting up city skies. For people on the ground, from Tel Aviv to Tehran every sunrise was a question mark: Will I see the next one?
Now, as of June 24th, a “phased” ceasefire has been announced. U.S. President Donald Trump claims he brokered the deal, ordering Iran to stop first, then Israel 12 hours later. Supposedly, full peace in 24 hours.
But hours after the so-called truce began, missiles still screamed through the sky.
Ceasefire or Theatre?
Here’s what we know:
- Iranian missiles reportedly struck southern Israel even after the ceasefire's start time.
- Israel responded with airstrikes near Tehran.
- Civilians continue to report explosions, destroyed buildings, and families displaced.
- Trump allegedly called Netanyahu, telling Israeli jets to “stand down” to preserve the deal.
The headlines say “peace.” The streets say otherwise.
And that's the part no one’s talking about enough: the gap between political theatre and ground reality.
Why People Don’t Believe It
There’s a reason this ceasefire isn’t inspiring hope. Actually, there are five:
1. Trust Is Dead
Iran and Israel don’t just dislike each other, they despise each other. Mutual distrust is baked into every diplomatic line, every military manoeuvre. A ceasefire between them isn’t a peace treaty; it’s a temporary pause in a long grudge match.
2. Ceasefire ≠ Silence
History has shown us: ceasefires in this region are rarely absolute. They often come with loopholes, violations, and ambiguous “retaliations.” It’s like calling a timeout in a boxing match where both fighters keep swinging.
3. Too Many Players, Too Many Agendas
This war wasn’t just Israel vs Iran. Militias, proxies, cyber groups, and global superpowers are involved. Even if Iran and Israel hit the brakes, others might not get the memo or ignore it altogether.
4. Trump’s Role Feels... Shaky
Many see this ceasefire as more of a political play than a peace mission. Trump is preparing for an election run and knows headlines matter. A ceasefire he "negotiated" boosts his resume, whether it holds or not.
5. People on the Ground Are Still Bleeding
Civilians in both countries are sceptical, because they’re still suffering. Just hours after the announcement, reports of new bombings rolled in. For families hiding in basements or mourning lost loved ones, the word “ceasefire” means nothing when the sky keeps exploding.
The Emotional Fallout
A friend of mine, who lives in Haifa, sent me a voice note. You could hear the sirens in the background.
“They said the war is over. Then ten minutes later, my neighbour's windows shattered from the shockwave.”
Another message, from a woman in Shiraz, read:
“My son keeps asking if the bad sounds are gone. I don’t have an answer for him.”
These are the people this ceasefire is supposed to protect. And they’re not feeling protected. They’re feeling abandoned by leaders making declarations from gilded offices thousands of miles away.
So… What Happens Now?
Honestly? No one knows.
There’s a version of this story where both sides stop, reflect, and recalibrate. Maybe even inch toward long-term diplomacy.
But there’s also the more likely version: the fighting pauses for a bit, resumes later with even more fury, and the ceasefire becomes just another broken promise in a long list of them.
And while the politicians posture, ordinary people suffer. Again.
Why This Matters Globally
This isn’t just a regional issue.
The Israel–Iran conflict pulls strings across the globe. U.S. involvement, oil prices, proxy battles, refugee crises, and cybersecurity all tie into this.
When missiles fly in the Middle East, tremors are felt in European markets, American politics, and Asian shipping lanes. Everyone has something at stake even if they’re not watching.
That’s why the world needs more than a statement. It needs truth. It needs transparency. And most of all, it needs peace that’s real not rehearsed.
Final Thoughts: Don't Let the Headlines Fool You
I want to believe in peace. I really do. I want to believe that maybe, for once, a ceasefire isn’t just a photo op.
But believing in peace starts with telling the truth. And the truth is: bombs don’t lie. Civilians don’t lie. Dead children don’t lie.
So until the skies really go quiet, until the people on both sides stop whispering “is it over?” with every breath… I won’t believe the ceasefire.
And maybe... just maybe... that’s exactly why it needs to be talked about.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Bevy Osuos and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Breaking: Melissa Hortman Shooting! What Really Happened?
Minnesota has been shaken in recent days as news broke of the so-called “Melissa Hortman shooting.” The incident rapidly made headlines, generating waves of concern, speculation, and public reaction. In this article, we break down everything currently known, sift through facts and rumors, and examine how this event is influencing Minnesota’s political climate and broader public discourse.
By Bevy Osuos7 months ago in The Swamp
America, Russia And Other Warships Head To India: What’s Coming Next?
In a rare demonstration of naval activity, fleets from the United States, Russia, and other key powers are reportedly heading toward India in what analysts describe as a “strategic maritime convergence.” This development has caught the attention of global security experts, as it signals potential shifts in geopolitical alignments and raises questions about the future of regional stability in the Indo-Pacific. The Arrival of Global Fleets Reports indicate that multiple naval vessels, including advanced warships from the US and Russia, are en route to Indian waters. While military exercises are routine, the presence of these fleets together in a region that has witnessed rising tensions over territorial disputes and trade routes has raised eyebrows. Analysts note that India’s strategic location, bridging the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, makes it a focal point for naval power projection. The United States has maintained a robust naval presence in the Indo-Pacific for decades, primarily to safeguard trade routes, deter Chinese expansion, and maintain alliances with regional partners. Russia, meanwhile, has been strengthening military cooperation with India, supplying advanced weaponry and conducting joint exercises. The convergence of both nations’ naval assets highlights the increasing strategic importance of India in global military planning. Potential Motivations Behind the Movement Several factors could explain this unprecedented maritime maneuver. First, India is emerging as a pivotal player in global defense and security. Its modernizing navy, coupled with strategic ports such as Visakhapatnam and Mumbai, provides a critical launchpad for joint operations or rapid deployment. Second, regional tensions are escalating. The South China Sea and the Indian Ocean have become hotspots for naval confrontations, with territorial disputes and trade security concerns at the forefront. A coordinated presence by multiple powers signals an intent to assert influence and project strength in the region. Third, these movements may reflect preparations for joint military exercises, which India frequently hosts with global partners. Such exercises allow navies to test interoperability, showcase capabilities, and strengthen diplomatic ties. However, the inclusion of both American and Russian forces—nations with historically divergent global objectives—adds a layer of complexity. Implications for Regional Security The presence of powerful fleets in India’s vicinity has multiple security implications. Regional players such as China, Pakistan, and smaller Indian Ocean nations are likely monitoring these developments closely. While some may view it as a stabilizing deterrent against unilateral aggression, others may see it as a provocative escalation. For India, this convergence is both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, hosting or coordinating with multiple powers underscores India’s rising strategic clout. On the other, managing the competing interests of major military players requires careful diplomacy to avoid unintended tensions. Additionally, maritime security experts warn that the dense concentration of warships can increase the risk of miscalculations or accidents at sea. Navigating crowded waters while conducting exercises demands precise communication and strict adherence to protocols. Any lapse could escalate tensions unexpectedly. The Geopolitical Angle Beyond the immediate region, this naval movement has broader geopolitical implications. The United States appears to reaffirm its commitment to balancing China’s growing influence in Asia. Russia, meanwhile, seems keen on maintaining strategic ties with India while signaling its continued global relevance amid Western sanctions and pressures. Other nations, possibly including European partners and Australia, may also observe or participate in related naval activities. Their involvement would further indicate the interconnectedness of global security concerns and the increasingly multipolar nature of maritime strategy. What Comes Next? While official statements remain cautious, experts anticipate a combination of joint exercises, port visits, and strategic consultations over the coming weeks. Analysts suggest that India may leverage this opportunity to strengthen defense agreements, secure technology transfers, and position itself as a central player in Indo-Pacific security. Diplomatic channels will be equally important. India must balance cooperation with major powers while maintaining an independent foreign policy, ensuring that these naval movements do not inadvertently heighten regional tensions.A Turning Point at Sea The arrival of American, Russian, and allied warships in India is more than a headline—it is a reflection of shifting global power dynamics. The Indian Ocean is no longer a quiet backdrop to world affairs; it is a central stage where the future of global security is being negotiated. As these fleets dock, train, and depart, the world will be watching closely. What happens next may well shape the balance of power across oceans for years to come.
By Fiaz Ahmed 5 days ago in The Swamp
The Dryads are Calling
They say the forest by Phoenix River sings. Perhaps it is just the wind howling through the leaves, or a particular birdsong. But Percy Fisher knows better; he knows what lies in those woods, and he knows that the forest sings of his demise.
By Leigh Hooperabout 15 hours ago in Fiction
Comments (1)
Trump's ceasefire claim seems sketchy. Missiles still flying shows it's not real peace.