art
Swing States: The Deciding Power in America’s Elections 🗳️🇺🇸
In every U.S. election, a handful of states capture the country’s attention more than any others. These are the swing states, also known as battleground states — regions where neither Democrats nor Republicans hold a guaranteed majority. Their voters swing between parties from one election to the next, making them the true deciding force behind America’s political direction.
By KAMRAN AHMAD2 months ago in The Swamp
Virginia Election Results 2025: Spanberger vs. Sears — A Defining Moment in State Politics
Breaking Down the Virginia Election Results The 2025 Virginia election results are finally in, marking one of the most closely watched and fiercely contested gubernatorial races in the country. After months of campaigning, debates, and political tension, Virginians cast their votes to decide the state’s political future — and the outcome could signal where the nation is headed as we approach 2026.
By KAMRAN AHMAD2 months ago in The Swamp
UPS Plane Crash in Louisville: Tragedy at Muhammad Ali International Airport
Louisville, Kentucky — What began as a routine cargo flight for UPS turned into a scene of tragedy early this morning when a McDonnell Douglas MD-11 cargo plane crashed near Muhammad Ali International Airport (SDF) in Louisville. The accident has sent shockwaves through the aviation community and prompted a full-scale investigation by federal authorities.
By KAMRAN AHMAD2 months ago in The Swamp
The Hand-Off
From courtroom to Christ consciousness – how the rise of Magdalene exposes the machinery of coercion. Believing that courts, lawyers, and law enforcement are simply uneducated, unaware, or even willfully ignorant about coercive control and the nuances of domestic violence may be naive.
By THE HONED CRONE2 months ago in The Swamp
“My Heart Stayed Calm Through Horror”. Content Warning.
How about a comparison of horror movies to the horror going on in America, lighthearted, I watched a horror movie last night, to my surprise my heart was not racing. I turned on the news about the ice terrorism and the horrors of Whitehouse being gutted so I turned the news off, turned on a horror movie again. I watched five horror films; my heart was pure at 82 beats a minute. I turned on the news again about tear gas sprayed on Halloween party together in a park, with children and knocking down old people, I said fuck it watched another horror film. what a relief to watch The Conjuring again and not the horrifying evil penetrating from the nazis in DC.
By Vicki Lawana Trusselli 3 months ago in The Swamp
Purpose and Heroism found in Charity
Today in my mailbox I found a lovely envelope stuffed with information about an organization I had never heard of: Mouth and Foot Painting Artists. They sent me a sample of Christmas cards painted by their mouth and foot artists such as the painting I've shared above. I'm astonished in the most pleasant way, and not slightly offended that they are requesting a donation for the Christmas cards. I have at times been accused of being a "rebel without a cause" but I do remind my accusers that I am an empathic, starving artist who can not afford to promote all the causes or charities that my heart goes out to. My artwork is strange and avant garde most of the time, yet I don't even think I'm in the same league as Iwao Adachi, who's talent to paint such a beautiful masterpiece by mouth is truly worth more than my meager donation.
By Shanon Angermeyer Norman3 months ago in The Swamp
Capitalism Ate the Internet (and I'm Still Hungry). Top Story - October 2025.
The internet used to be stupid in the best way. We spent hours playing free minigames on sites that would give modern cybersecurity experts night terrors, their sleep paralysis demon in the corner asking, “What’s ‘Taters’, eh?”. (Boil ’em, mash ’em, stick ’em in a stew!) We watched pure stupidity to the tune of Charlie the Unicorn and Salad Fingers and Old Gregg. We thought we’d achieved the heights of comedy. And in some ways, we had.
By Autumn Stew3 months ago in The Swamp
Trump hopes to put an end to Russia’s war without selling Tomahawks to Ukraine
Previous U.S. By announcing that he intends to put an end to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine without deploying sophisticated American weapons, particularly Tomahawk missiles, to Kyiv, President Donald Trump has once more attracted the attention of the entire world. His most recent statement comes as Washington's debate over how to strike a balance between military assistance and diplomatic intervention grows. Trump, who is known for taking a different approach to foreign policy, insists that peace can be achieved through "strong negotiation and respect" rather than providing an endless supply of weapons. Trump said at a rally in Ohio that if he was elected, he could end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine "within 24 hours." He argued that where current leadership has failed, his administration's diplomatic style, based on leverage and mutual understanding, would succeed. Trump declared, "We don't need to sell or send Tomahawks to Ukraine to stop this war." "We need smart leadership that gets Putin and Zelenskyy to sit down together, not one that keeps fueling war," says the author. His remarks set off a political firestorm in a short amount of time, prompting harsh criticism from Democrats and Republicans who fear withholding military assistance would empower Moscow. The United States' Tomahawk missile, a long-range precision weapon The Navy has come to represent American military might. In light of the intensification of Russian strikes in the eastern and southern regions, Ukraine's allies have discussed the possibility of providing such advanced systems to bolster Kiev's defenses. However, Trump's position departs significantly from the current strategy of the Biden administration, which places an emphasis on continuing to transfer weapons to support Ukraine's resistance. Trump's position, according to critics, understates the war's complexity and the Kremlin's threat. They argue that Ukraine may face overwhelming odds if it does not receive consistent Western military assistance. However, Trump's supporters see his stance as pragmatic and in line with a growing number of U.S. voters who are tired of being involved in foreign affairs. Debate over whether such expenditures truly serve national interests has been sparked by the war's cost in billions of dollars to taxpayers in the United States. Trump's doctrine on foreign policy, which is frequently referred to as "America First," has long emphasized lessening the United States' involvement in long-running conflicts overseas. During his presidency, he criticized NATO members for not contributing enough to their own defense and advocated for troop withdrawals from Syria and Afghanistan. His most recent comments regarding Ukraine follow the same pattern, putting diplomacy ahead of intervention. He stated, "We need peace through strength, not interminable wars through weakness." Diplomats say that Trump's plan to end the war between Russia and Ukraine would probably involve high-level talks and conditional rewards for both sides. In exchange for a ceasefire, he may, according to some, offer Russia relief from some sanctions and encourage Ukraine to accept security guarantees rather than territorial gains. However, others warn that a deal of this kind might jeopardize Ukraine's sovereignty and legitimize Russian aggression. There has been a variety of international reaction to Trump's statement. Although they have not provided any direct comments, Russian officials have previously stated that they would welcome any American leader who is willing to engage in dialogue. In the meantime, officials in Ukraine deemed Trump's claim that he could end the war in one day to be untrue. A spokesperson for the Ukrainian government stated, "We appreciate any effort for peace," but "ending a war started by invasion requires more than negotiation slogans." Despite skepticism, some segments of the American electorate who are dissatisfied with the war's economic effects have found resonance in Trump's remarks. Voters are feeling worn out as a result of inflation, rising energy costs, and spending on defense. Due to the fact that the conflict does not appear to be coming to an end immediately, polls indicate that a growing number of Americans would rather see diplomatic solutions than military escalation. Trump's comments also serve as a strategic campaign message as the 2024 election nears. He wants to set himself apart from President Joe Biden, who continues to support Ukraine militarily, by portraying himself as a dealmaker who can end wars without weapons. Trump sees the idea of resolving the crisis without using Tomahawks or selling them as a sign of fiscal restraint and global influence. It is still unknown whether his strategy would truly bring peace. The territorial disputes, national identities, and geopolitical rivalries that go far beyond simple negotiation are at the heart of the conflict in Ukraine. Nevertheless, the topic of the significance of diplomacy in contemporary warfare has been brought back up by Trump's resolute assertion. The broader question of whether U.S. leadership can shift from weapons to words and still maintain global strength is emphasized by his promise to end the conflict "without firing a single missile."
By GLOBAL NEWS3 months ago in The Swamp
