PTI Leader Latif Khosa Writes to CJP, Raises Concerns Over Imran’s Medical Check-Up at Adiala Jail in ‘Secrecy’
Formal / News Style PTI urges Supreme Court intervention over lack of transparency in Imran Khan’s medical examination Questions raised about former prime minister’s health after undisclosed jail check-up 🔹 Neutral & Informative Khosa calls for independent medical board and disclosure of medical report Legal team seeks judicial oversight of Imran Khan’s treatment in custody 🔹 Impactful Secrecy over Imran Khan’s health sparks legal and political concern
Senior Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Latif Khosa has written a formal letter to the Supreme Court of Pakistan, urging immediate judicial intervention over what he described as a “secretive and non-transparent” medical examination of former prime minister Imran Khan at Adiala Jail.
In his letter addressed to the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Khosa alleged that Khan’s recent medical check-up was conducted without informing his legal team or family members and without following standard legal and medical protocols. The PTI leader claimed that this secrecy has raised serious concerns about Khan’s health, safety, and constitutional rights while in custody.
Concerns Over Transparency
Khosa stated that the medical examination was carried out under “unusual circumstances,” with restricted access to independent doctors and no official medical report shared with Khan’s lawyers. According to the letter, this violated basic principles of transparency and due process guaranteed under Pakistan’s Constitution and international human rights conventions.
“Such secrecy creates doubt and anxiety regarding the true state of Mr. Khan’s health,” Khosa wrote, emphasizing that a former prime minister and political leader must not be deprived of proper and transparent medical care. He urged the court to ensure that future medical assessments be conducted in the presence of independent physicians and legal representatives.
Health Issues and Previous Warnings
Imran Khan, who has been in custody in multiple cases, has previously complained of deteriorating health conditions, including vision problems and chronic pain. PTI officials have repeatedly warned that his confinement conditions could worsen his medical state if not monitored properly.
Party leaders have also accused jail authorities of denying him access to personal physicians and adequate medical facilities. While prison officials have denied these claims, asserting that Khan is receiving routine care under jail regulations, PTI leaders argue that the lack of documentation and public reporting undermines those assurances.
Legal and Political Dimensions
The issue has quickly taken on political significance, with PTI framing the situation as part of a broader pattern of pressure on its leadership. Khosa’s letter highlights what he called a “systematic effort to isolate Imran Khan” by restricting communication, visitation rights, and now medical transparency.
Legal experts say the matter could prompt the Supreme Court to seek a detailed report from jail authorities and health officials. In past cases involving high-profile detainees, the court has intervened to ensure independent medical boards were formed and periodic health reports submitted.
Khosa requested that the Chief Justice order the constitution of a neutral medical board comprising senior doctors from government hospitals, with authority to conduct a comprehensive health assessment of Khan and submit findings directly to the court.
Reaction from PTI Leadership
PTI leaders rallied behind Khosa’s move, calling it a necessary step to safeguard Khan’s well-being. Several party figures said the secrecy surrounding the medical check-up had alarmed supporters and family members alike.
A senior PTI spokesperson said the party was not seeking preferential treatment but only equal rights under the law. “Every prisoner has the right to transparent medical care. Imran Khan is no exception,” the spokesperson said, adding that the party would continue to pursue legal remedies if concerns were not addressed.
Government and Jail Authorities’ Position
Officials from Adiala Jail have maintained that Khan is receiving medical attention according to prison rules and that no extraordinary measures were taken. They argue that medical procedures inside high-security prisons often involve limited disclosure due to security considerations.
Government representatives have also rejected claims of mistreatment, stating that opposition leaders are politicizing a routine health check-up. However, they have not publicly released detailed medical findings, citing privacy and security concerns.
Broader Implications
The controversy highlights ongoing tensions between the PTI and state institutions, especially the judiciary and prison authorities. Analysts believe the case could further polarize the political environment, as supporters interpret the issue as symbolic of larger questions about rule of law and human rights.
Human rights advocates have called for full transparency in the treatment of political detainees, warning that secrecy in medical matters can erode public trust in institutions.
What Comes Next
The Supreme Court is expected to review Khosa’s letter and decide whether to seek an official response from jail authorities or order an independent medical evaluation. If taken up, the case could set a precedent for how health concerns of high-profile prisoners are handled in Pakistan.
For now, the issue remains a focal point for PTI’s legal and political campaign, with party leaders insisting that only judicial oversight can guarantee Imran Khan’s safety and constitutional rights while he remains in custody.
About the Creator
Fiaz Ahmed
I am Fiaz Ahmed. I am a passionate writer. I love covering trending topics and breaking news. With a sharp eye for what’s happening around the world, and crafts timely and engaging stories that keep readers informed and updated.
Keep reading
More stories from Fiaz Ahmed and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Coco Gauff: ‘I Don’t Think People Should Be Dying in the Streets Just for Existing
American tennis star Coco Gauff has spoken out forcefully about social justice, saying she feels a responsibility to use her platform to address violence and inequality, even when doing so risks criticism. In a candid interview following her recent tournament appearance, the 20-year-old athlete reflected on the intersection of sport, activism, and personal identity, stressing that silence is no longer an option when lives are at stake. “I don’t think people should be dying in the streets just for existing,” Gauff said, underscoring her belief that athletes cannot remain detached from the realities shaping their communities. Her comments come amid renewed global debate over racial justice, policing, and the role of public figures in advocating for change. A Voice Beyond the Court Gauff has long been recognized not only for her rapid rise in tennis but also for her willingness to speak about social issues. From addressing crowds at protests to using press conferences as platforms for awareness, she has consistently argued that being an athlete does not mean being apolitical. She explained that her experiences growing up in the United States shaped her views, particularly witnessing protests and conversations about racial inequality during her teenage years. “I’m young, but I’ve seen enough to know that this isn’t something you can just ignore,” she said. “If I have a voice and people are listening, then I feel like it’s wrong not to say something.” Balancing Pressure and Purpose Gauff acknowledged that activism brings added pressure to an already demanding career. Professional tennis requires relentless focus, intense travel schedules, and constant scrutiny. Adding social commentary to that mix can invite backlash from fans who believe athletes should “stick to sports.” Yet she rejects that notion. “Tennis is what I do, but it’s not all that I am,” she said. “I care about people. I care about fairness. Those things don’t disappear when I step on the court.” She also emphasized that her advocacy is not about attacking institutions or individuals but about urging compassion and accountability. According to Gauff, the goal is to humanize conversations that often become polarized and political. “This is about basic human rights,” she noted. “It shouldn’t be controversial to say people deserve to live safely.” A Generation of Athlete-Activists Gauff’s stance reflects a broader trend among younger athletes who are increasingly vocal about social issues. Unlike previous generations that often avoided public political statements, today’s stars view activism as part of their public responsibility. Sports analysts suggest that social media has played a key role in this shift, allowing athletes to speak directly to millions without relying solely on traditional media outlets. For Gauff, that visibility carries weight. “When you have that reach, you can’t pretend it doesn’t matter,” she said. She has also credited her family for encouraging thoughtful engagement rather than impulsive reactions. “They taught me to learn, to listen, and to speak when I feel something is wrong,” she explained. Reaction from the Tennis World Within the tennis community, reactions have been mixed. Many fans and fellow players praised her courage and maturity, calling her a role model for young athletes. Others argued that sports should remain neutral spaces free from political discussion. Tournament officials have so far avoided taking positions on her comments, maintaining that players are free to express personal views as long as they do not disrupt competition. Sponsors, too, have largely stayed silent, reflecting the delicate balance between commercial interests and individual expression. Looking Ahead Gauff says she does not plan to retreat from speaking out, even as her career continues to accelerate. She believes that success on the court and responsibility off it can coexist. “I want to win Grand Slams, but I also want to be someone who stands for something,” she said. As she prepares for upcoming tournaments, Gauff remains focused on her training while staying engaged with issues beyond tennis. Her message, she insists, is simple and universal: dignity and safety should not depend on race, background, or circumstance. “I’m just saying what I think is right,” she concluded. “People shouldn’t be dying in the streets just for existing.”
By Fiaz Ahmed 3 days ago in The Swamp
Why Black History Matters in America?
The United States of America is celebrating their 250th anniversary in 2026. I'm proud to be an American and as someone who was born here, I wouldn't imagine myself living anywhere else. This is a country where opportunities are possible. Where anyone can be successful in anything they desire to do. Equality, community, and togetherness are the backbones of what America is and should be about. However, we have an administration who wants to erase and disregard those who have made positive, meaningful impacts in our country, specifically Black figures, such as Martin Luther King, Jr., Rosa Parks, and Maya Angelou. President Trump and his administration have been constantly complaining and fighting against what they call the "Woke agenda". They use this excuse as a distraction from other issues they refuse to address, such as the high cost of living, climate change, and inflation. That equality is dividing America, when in reality, it's bringing us together. Being woke is not tied to a specific political party. No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, you can still care about other people and their plights. Compassion and empathy for others isn't tied to a political party, either. We were taught as children to treat others the way we want to be treated and not judge others because they're different from us. Caring about others isn't a personal attack on your beliefs. It doesn't make you any less of a person. People who are easily offended over African American figures, past or present, or anything related to it, are grasping at straws. Current and future generations need to know who people like Harriet Tubman and Shirley Chisholm were, especially in the classroom. Black History is part of American History. It should be recognized, not hidden or forgotten. Besides, you can't shield children from everything, just because your feelings are easily hurt.
By Mark Wesley Pritchard 18 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.