Pakistan’s Army Has Always Been Influential — Now Its Chief Has New Powers

For decades, Pakistan’s army has played an important role in shaping the country’s politics, security policies, and power structures. Even during periods of democratic rule, military leaders have held influence in key decisions—from foreign affairs to internal stability. But today, the position of Pakistan’s army chief has expanded even further, gaining new authority that is changing the balance between elected leadership and military command.

The evolution of these powers is not sudden. Instead, it reflects Pakistan’s long history of military involvement in governance and the growing challenges the country faces. As political divisions deepen and economic issues pressure the state, the army chief’s strengthened role has become a defining topic in Pakistan’s current political landscape.

A Long History of Military Influence

Pakistan’s army has been influential since the country’s early years. Military rule has occurred several times, and even during civilian governments, the army has shaped national direction behind the scenes. Security concerns, border tensions, and internal conflicts have kept the military on the front lines, building a reputation for discipline and national defense.

Because of this, many citizens see the army as a stabilizing force. However, critics argue that continuous military involvement in governance prevents democracy from fully maturing. This ongoing debate sets the backdrop for the new powers that have recently been granted to the army chief.

What Has Changed? The Army Chief’s Expanded Role

In recent years, the authority of Pakistan’s military leadership has grown through legal, administrative, and political decisions. The army chief now has greater control over internal security matters, policy consultations, and coordination between government institutions. Several new responsibilities have reportedly been added, including:

Stronger oversight of counterterrorism strategy

A larger advisory role in economic and administrative decisions

More influence in crisis management and civil-military coordination

Expanded involvement in discussions with international partners

These developments reflect the state’s belief that Pakistan needs tighter security management and more unified leadership during uncertain times. But they also raise questions about how much power should remain in military hands.

Why These Powers Were Granted

Understanding why the army chief’s authority has increased requires looking at Pakistan’s current challenges. The country faces:

Political polarization

Economic instability

Rising security concerns

Regional diplomatic tensions

During turbulent periods, the military often becomes more involved as governments look for stability and expertise. Supporters argue that the army’s organizational strength and experience make it better equipped to manage crises. They say the expanded powers are a practical response to current national needs.

However, critics warn that such changes can weaken democratic institutions by overshadowing civilian leadership. They argue that long-term stability can only be achieved when elected leaders fully hold decision-making power.

Impact on Civil-Military Relations

Pakistan’s civil-military relationship has always been sensitive. The army’s new powers have added another layer to the dynamic between political leaders and military officials.

Some analysts believe this could create smoother coordination, reducing delays in policy implementation. Others worry it may blur the boundaries between civilian authority and military oversight.

The key question is: Can both sides work together without undermining constitutional roles? The answer will shape Pakistan’s political environment in the years to come.

Public Reactions and Concerns

Public opinion is divided. Many citizens trust the military more than elected politicians, seeing the new powers as a step toward stability. They believe the army can fill gaps left by political conflicts and inconsistent governance.

On the other hand, democracy advocates express concern. They fear the changes may weaken parliament, reduce transparency, and limit accountability. The debate continues across media, social platforms, and political circles.

What This Means for Pakistan’s Future

Pakistan stands at an important point in its political journey. The expanded powers of the army chief highlight how deeply the military remains connected to state affairs. Whether this leads to greater stability .