The tribunal hall is utterly silent, except for the sniffling and suppressed sobs. The uniformed soldiers keeping the peace are statuesque in their quiet survey of the defendants. Still, whether it was a trick of the light or just fanciful imagination, tear tracks carved down the stony faces as the horrific images played on the large plasma screen.
The entire administration and collaborators of the deposed regime were forced to watch the carnage and inhumanity they had unleashed upon their citizens. Citizens who had voted them into power only to be betrayed with the mere flick of a pen across paper. Various members of their crusade force fight to hide their face, still the cowards they were while they committed the atrocities commanded of them. How many families had they ripped apart? How many women had they assaulted in the detention centers? How many children grew up parentless because they were just "following orders"?
The media footage shown was not the sanitized videos of the compromised news stations. These were unedited clips from citizens and journalists. It showed each horrible event in unflinching, raw clarity. Elderly men pinned to the ground, his assailant kneeling on his neck. A woman being thrown against a car, her relative pulling children back so they wouldn't be hurt in the crossfire. Teenagers being pelted with "nonlethal" bullets, just for holding signs and opposing the regime who sought to erase them.
The detention centers featured heavily in the reels. Hundreds of people kept in cages without water, food, or bedding. Children who've been taken from their parents, the light gone from their eyes. The women have substantially more injuries than the men and some are nearly naked, humiliation and exploitation being a favorite pastime of many agents. Next, come images of the prison camps. The hunched-over men, stripped of all their clothes and dignity, are corpse-like in their silent surrender. They have not been killed. No, it's worse than that. They have had their souls destroyed by such ruthless dehumanization.
All because of their skin color. Their language. Their beliefs. Their culture.
You, my reader, must be thinking that this is about the Holocaust and the Nuremberg Trials. In a way, it is. The same tactics have been exercised in the modern world today. I am talking about what is happening at this very moment as well as what happened over 80 years ago. Because history is repeating.
If you are one of the modern-day crusaders thinking that you're serving America -- you will be remembered. And that's not a good thing. You will remembered as the cowards who normalized brutalization, all for a soulless man whose death will be a national holiday, hopefully happening sometime soon.
I wish hell existed for people like you. A hell where the roles are reversed and you have to suffer through the eyes of every person you tortured. You have to feel their every pain, their every tear, their every heartbreaking moments in captivity. And when you're begging for mercy in the cages, asking why a person would do this to another human being...I hope they answer,
"Just following orders."
About the Creator
CT Idlehouse
I write stories and articles. Sometimes they're good.
Keep reading
More stories from CT Idlehouse and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
More Than 500 Dead in Iran Protests — U.S. Considers Military Options
Iran is facing one of its most intense periods of unrest in years as widespread protests continue across multiple cities, drawing global attention and growing concern. Human rights organizations and international observers report that more than 500 people may have been killed since demonstrations began, marking a devastating toll that has intensified diplomatic pressure on Tehran. As the situation deteriorates, the United States is openly debating possible responses, including military options, raising fears of further escalation in an already volatile region. A Nation in Turmoil The protests, which began amid economic hardship and political frustration, have evolved into a broader movement challenging government authority. Demonstrators have taken to the streets demanding accountability, improved living conditions, and greater personal freedoms. While the Iranian government has described the unrest as foreign-backed destabilization, protesters and activists portray it as a grassroots expression of public anger. Reports from inside Iran remain difficult to verify due to media restrictions and internet shutdowns. However, international human rights groups estimate that hundreds of civilians have died during clashes between security forces and demonstrators. Thousands more have reportedly been detained, adding to fears of widespread repression. The rising death toll has transformed what began as domestic unrest into an international crisis. Government Response and Crackdown Iranian authorities have responded forcefully, deploying security forces to suppress protests and restore order. Officials insist their actions are necessary to maintain national stability and protect public institutions. State media emphasizes incidents of violence and vandalism, framing the protests as a security threat rather than a political movement. Critics argue that the heavy-handed response has only fueled further anger. Images and testimonies shared by activists show security forces confronting unarmed civilians, intensifying global outrage. Calls for independent investigations have grown louder, though Iranian leadership has rejected external interference. International Reaction Grows As reports of rising casualties spread, international condemnation has increased. Western governments, including the United States, have expressed deep concern over the situation. Statements from U.S. officials emphasize support for the Iranian people’s right to peaceful protest while condemning the use of lethal force against civilians. The United Nations and several human rights organizations have urged restraint and called for accountability. Diplomatic efforts have so far yielded limited results, with Tehran dismissing many criticisms as politically motivated. U.S. Considers Military Options Amid mounting pressure, discussions within the United States have taken a sharper tone. While no formal decision has been announced, U.S. officials have acknowledged that “all options remain on the table” should the situation worsen. This language has sparked intense debate over what role, if any, military force should play in responding to Iran’s internal crisis. Supporters of a tougher stance argue that continued violence against civilians demands a strong response. They believe that clear consequences could deter further abuses and demonstrate international resolve. Others caution that military intervention could escalate the conflict, potentially destabilizing the entire Middle East. Historically, U.S.–Iran relations have been marked by distrust, sanctions, and limited diplomatic engagement. Any military action, even symbolic, would likely have far-reaching consequences beyond Iran’s borders. Risks of Escalation Analysts warn that increased U.S. involvement could trigger retaliation from Iran or its regional allies. The Middle East is already navigating multiple conflicts, and further escalation could disrupt global energy markets and threaten regional security. There is also concern that military threats may strengthen hardline factions within Iran, undermining internal reform movements. Critics argue that external pressure often allows governments to shift focus away from domestic grievances by framing unrest as foreign aggression. For this reason, many experts advocate for diplomatic pressure, targeted sanctions, and international monitoring rather than direct military involvement. Voices From the Iranian Diaspora Outside Iran, members of the Iranian diaspora have organized demonstrations and advocacy campaigns, urging global leaders to take action. These voices emphasize the human cost of the crisis, sharing stories of families affected by violence and detention. While opinions differ on the best course forward, there is widespread agreement on one point: the loss of life is unacceptable, and the international community cannot ignore the situation. A Critical Moment Ahead The unfolding crisis places Iran and the United States at a dangerous crossroads. With more than 500 deaths reportedly linked to the protests, the pressure for decisive action continues to build. At the same time, the risks associated with military involvement remain high. What happens next will depend on a combination of internal developments within Iran and the choices made by global powers. Whether the situation moves toward dialogue or deeper confrontation will shape not only Iran’s future but also the stability of the broader region. Conclusion The reported death toll from Iran’s protests represents more than statistics—it reflects a nation in distress and a world struggling to respond. As the U.S. considers its options, the challenge lies in balancing accountability with restraint. In moments like these, the consequences of action—and inaction—carry profound weight.
By Saboor Brohi about 14 hours ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.