Jeff Landry Is Trump’s Envoy to Greenland. He Wants to Celebrate Gumbo.
Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry takes on an unusual diplomatic role in Greenland
A Louisiana governor’s unusual diplomatic role sparks culture, controversy, and questions about U.S.–Greenland relations
Louisiana’s Governor Jeff Landry has found himself in an unexpected spot: he’s now the United States’ special envoy to Greenland. Appointed by President Donald Trump late last year, Landry’s new role has drawn attention for its unusual mix of diplomacy, culture, and controversy — including his plan to introduce Greenlanders to Louisiana’s famous gumbo.
The Washington Post +1
But while Landry talks about culinary diplomacy, the broader story raises serious questions about U.S. foreign policy, Greenland’s response, and international reactions.
Who Is Jeff Landry?
Jeff Landry is best known as the Republican governor of Louisiana, a position he has held since January 2024. Earlier in his career, he served as Louisiana’s attorney general and spent time in Congress.
Wikipedia
Despite his political resume, Landry had no formal diplomatic experience or history working on Arctic issues before his appointment as special envoy to Greenland. The role, established by President Trump, is informal and does not give him official diplomatic status with Denmark, which is the sovereign nation that oversees Greenland.
Wikipedia
The Greenland Assignment: What It Means
President Trump has long expressed strategic interest in Greenland. At various times, he has suggested that the United States should have greater influence — or even acquire the island — arguing that its location is vital for U.S. national security. Trump called Greenland “essential” and said it is important to protect the region from competitors like Russia and China.
www.ndtv.com
When Trump announced Landry’s appointment as special envoy to Greenland, he praised the Louisiana governor for understanding the island’s importance. In a social media post, Trump said Landry would help “strongly advance our country’s interests,” including those of U.S. allies.
Landry himself thanked Trump, calling it “an honor” to serve in a volunteer position that he says “in no way affects my position as Governor of Louisiana.” He added that the role was meant to help bring Greenland closer to the United States.
Gumbo Diplomacy? A Cultural Twist
In interviews, Landry has tried to frame his approach as friendly and cultural rather than confrontational. One of his more talked‑about ideas has been the notion of “culinary diplomacy” — using Louisiana food to build connections. He has suggested sharing gumbo, a staple Louisiana dish, with Greenlanders as a way to break the ice and find common ground.
The Washington Post
Landry has touted similarities between people in Greenland and Louisiana, saying they both enjoy hunting, fishing, and “having a good time,” and humorously suggested that Greenlanders might like to visit Louisiana in summer.
The Washington Post
While this idea has caught attention and even laughs, some observers say that food alone is unlikely to resolve larger diplomatic concerns — especially when Greenlanders and Danish officials have firmly rejected ideas about U.S. control of the island.
The Washington Post
Backlash From Greenland and Denmark
The appointment and Trump’s broader talk about Greenland have not been well received by many officials in Copenhagen and Nuuk.
Denmark and Greenland have repeatedly emphasized that Greenland’s sovereignty is nonnegotiable. Leaders in both places have underscored that Greenland is not for sale and that decisions about its future belong to its people
In December, a joint statement from Denmark’s prime minister and Greenland’s prime minister insisted that no country should be annexed. They called for respect for territorial integrity and reaffirmed Greenland’s right to decide its own
Greenlandic organizations have also responded unfavorably to U.S. outreach. One prominent event — the country’s annual dog sled race — withdrew an invitation to Landry after criticism that his presence would be inappropriate amid rising tensions.
dailykos.com
What Landry Has (and Has Not) Done
To date, Landry has not visited Greenland and has been focused mostly on media appearances where he promotes the idea of friendship and cultural exchange. Reports suggest that many Greenlandic officials have had no direct contact with him.
The Washington Post
Landry also missed a high‑level White House meeting that included both Danish and Greenlandic officials, although he later arrived in Washington for related discussions.
The Washington Post
Officials in Denmark and Greenland have pushed back on the idea that the United States could reorganize Greenland’s governance — a suggestion that has upset a NATO ally and raised concerns among European partners.
The Times of India
Culinary Diplomacy Versus Strategic Reality
Landry’s plan to celebrate gumbo and build cultural bridges is an unusual approach to diplomacy, especially in a situation fraught with sovereignty concerns, strategic competition, and geopolitical tension. While sharing food and culture can help build personal rapport, analysts suggest real diplomatic progress requires more than culinary goodwill — especially when key players insist on respect for established political boundaries and self‑rule.
Some critics even describe the envoy position as a public relations effort rather than a serious diplomatic strategy, noting that Landry’s volunteer role lacks formal accreditation and substantive engagement so far.
Why This Matters Globally
Greenland is not just a remote island; it sits in a strategically important location in the Arctic, and its natural resources have drawn interest from powerful nations. The United States has strategic reasons to want influence there, and Trump has repeatedly highlighted those concerns.
www.ndtv.com
But U.S. partnerships and alliances — especially with Denmark, a NATO member — depend on recognizing sovereignty, diplomacy, and international law. The controversy over the envoy appointment shows how easily missteps can strain even long‑standing relationships.
Conclusion: Gumbo and Geopolitics
Jeff Landry’s role as Trump’s envoy to Greenland is one of the more unusual stories in recent diplomacy — a Louisiana governor promoting cultural connections and gumbo while navigating a complex and sensitive political mission. What began as lighthearted talk about shared food and friendship has become part of a broader debate about how nations should engage with one another respectfully and responsibly.
Whether gumbo will ever win hearts in Nuuk remains to be seen. For now, Greenlanders and Danish leaders continue to stand firm on their sovereignty, and Landry’s “culinary diplomacy” — and his broader mission — face serious challenges on the world stage.
About the Creator
Fiaz Ahmed
I am Fiaz Ahmed. I am a passionate writer. I love covering trending topics and breaking news. With a sharp eye for what’s happening around the world, and crafts timely and engaging stories that keep readers informed and updated.
Keep reading
More stories from Fiaz Ahmed and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Russia to Pause Attacks on Ukraine as Temperatures Plummet
Extreme cold leads to temporary reduction in hostilities, but challenges remain on both sides As temperatures across Ukraine plummet to record lows, reports indicate that Russian forces are temporarily pausing offensive operations in some areas. The extreme winter conditions have created difficult logistical and operational challenges, affecting both Russian troops and Ukrainian defenders. While this pause may offer temporary relief to civilians and frontline forces, experts caution that the broader conflict remains unresolved, and fighting could resume once conditions improve. Why the Pause Is Happening Military analysts point to several factors influencing Russia’s temporary halt: Severe cold: Temperatures in eastern Ukraine have dropped well below freezing, making movement of troops and vehicles difficult. Winter conditions also increase the risk of frostbite, hypothermia, and mechanical failures in military equipment. Supply chain difficulties: Extreme cold affects fuel, ammunition, and food supply lines, forcing militaries to slow operations or suspend attacks temporarily. Safety of personnel: Even experienced troops face increased risk during prolonged exposure to severe winter conditions. Commanders may pause offensives to preserve manpower. Ukrainian forces are also adjusting their strategies, using the pause to reinforce positions, repair equipment, and provide aid to civilians affected by the cold. Impact on Civilians For civilians living in conflict zones, the pause in Russian attacks is a mixed blessing: Immediate safety: Reduced shelling and airstrikes provide a temporary window for families to seek shelter, evacuate, or access humanitarian aid. Continued hardship: Many communities remain without electricity, heat, or running water due to damaged infrastructure. Cold temperatures exacerbate the humanitarian crisis, especially for elderly and vulnerable populations. Relief efforts: NGOs and government agencies are attempting to deliver food, medical supplies, and winter clothing, but access remains challenging in contested areas. Experts emphasize that even with reduced attacks, civilians cannot assume a lasting end to hostilities, as military operations could resume once the weather improves. Military Consequences The pause in operations has strategic implications: Opportunity for Ukrainian forces: Ukrainian troops may use the lull to fortify defensive positions, reposition troops, and resupply frontline units. Russian military planning: Russia may use this time to repair equipment, replenish stockpiles, and prepare for renewed offensives once winter conditions ease. Shift in tactics: Analysts predict that both sides may adjust strategies to account for seasonal limitations, including potential reliance on drones, long-range artillery, and smaller-scale operations during extreme cold. While the pause is temporary, it provides both sides an opportunity to assess capabilities and plan next moves. International Observations Global leaders and analysts are closely monitoring the situation. Some key points include: Diplomatic pressure: International calls for ceasefires often intensify during winter months, particularly when civilian populations face life-threatening conditions. Humanitarian coordination: Organizations like the United Nations and Red Cross are attempting to leverage the pause to deliver aid and assess needs on the ground. Media coverage: The temporary reduction in attacks has prompted discussions about the human cost of winter warfare and the broader trajectory of the conflict. While the pause may create a temporary reprieve, observers warn that long-term resolution remains uncertain, and renewed violence could occur without warning. Historical Context Winter conditions have historically influenced military campaigns in Ukraine and other northern regions: During World War II, both German and Soviet forces faced severe setbacks due to winter, including frozen rivers, stalled vehicles, and frost-related casualties. Modern warfare still faces similar challenges, as extreme cold affects mobility, communications, and medical support. Military historians emphasize that weather often plays a decisive role in the timing and intensity of offensives. What’s Next? Experts suggest that while the pause may temporarily reduce the immediate human toll, the conflict remains unresolved: Continued monitoring: Both Russian and Ukrainian forces are likely using this period to reassess positions and strengthen defenses. Humanitarian preparation: Relief organizations must act quickly to deliver supplies before renewed fighting disrupts aid routes. Strategic planning: Analysts predict that as temperatures rise and conditions improve, Russia may resume targeted attacks, while Ukraine prepares to counter them with improved strategies. The pause is not a ceasefire, but rather a tactical adjustment to extreme weather conditions. Civilians, soldiers, and international observers remain on high alert. Conclusion The announcement that Russia is pausing attacks in Ukraine due to plummeting temperatures provides a temporary break for frontline communities. It highlights the challenges of conducting military operations in extreme winter conditions and the human costs of prolonged conflict. While the cold offers a brief respite, experts emphasize that the strategic situation remains fragile. Both sides may resume offensive operations once weather conditions improve, and civilians continue to bear the brunt of the conflict. In the meantime, the pause serves as a reminder that nature itself can influence the course of modern warfare, offering fleeting relief and creating opportunities for both humanitarian and military planning.
By Fiaz Ahmed a day ago in The Swamp
Is Time a Fundamental Part of Reality? A Quiet Revolution in Physics Suggests Not
Time feels unavoidable. We measure our lives in seconds and years, plan our futures, and remember our pasts through its steady flow. Yet a growing number of physicists are beginning to question something radical: what if time is not fundamental at all? What if it is not a basic ingredient of the universe, but an emergent concept—something that arises from deeper laws of nature? This idea, once confined to abstract philosophy, is now gaining traction in cutting-edge physics. Quietly, and without dramatic headlines, researchers are rethinking one of the most basic assumptions about reality itself. Why Time Has Always Seemed Fundamental In everyday life and classical physics, time appears inseparable from reality. Isaac Newton treated time as absolute—a universal clock ticking away the same for everyone, everywhere. Even Einstein’s theory of relativity, which showed that time can stretch and slow depending on speed and gravity, still treated time as a real dimension woven together with space. Modern physics describes the universe using spacetime: a four-dimensional structure where events occur at specific locations and moments. From this perspective, time is as real as length or mass. So why question it now? The Problem Time Creates in Fundamental Physics The trouble begins when physicists try to reconcile general relativity (which governs gravity and the large-scale structure of the universe) with quantum mechanics (which governs the smallest particles). In quantum mechanics, time is treated as an external parameter—a background clock against which change happens. In general relativity, however, time is dynamic. It bends, slows, and depends on gravity. When researchers attempt to merge these two theories into a single framework of quantum gravity, time becomes deeply problematic. In some of the most important equations, time disappears entirely. This absence has forced physicists to ask a disturbing question: If the most fundamental laws of nature do not include time, where does it come from? The Idea of Timeless Physics Several modern theories suggest that at the deepest level of reality, the universe may be timeless. One influential idea comes from approaches to quantum gravity where the equations describe relationships between physical states, not how those states evolve over time. In these models, the universe is not something that “happens” moment by moment. Instead, it simply is. Change, motion, and time emerge only when observers inside the system describe it in a certain way. This is not to say that nothing changes—but that change does not require time as a fundamental ingredient. Time as an Emergent Phenomenon An increasingly popular view is that time is emergent, similar to temperature. Temperature feels fundamental, but at a deeper level it arises from the motion of particles. No single atom has a temperature; it emerges only when many particles interact. Likewise, time may emerge from relationships between physical systems. When one part of the universe changes relative to another, we interpret that change as time passing. In this view, clocks do not measure a universal time flowing through the cosmos. They simply track correlations between physical processes. The Arrow of Time and Entropy One of the strongest arguments for time’s reality is the arrow of time—the fact that we remember the past but not the future, and that disorder (entropy) tends to increase. However, some physicists argue that the arrow of time does not require time itself to be fundamental. Instead, it may arise from special initial conditions of the universe and the statistical behavior of matter. The laws of physics, at their core, often work the same forward and backward. The sense of direction we associate with time may come from how information is processed and remembered by complex systems like brains. What This Means for Reality and Consciousness If time is not fundamental, the implications are profound. It would mean that the universe does not “unfold” in the way we intuitively imagine. Past, present, and future may not be objectively distinct at the deepest level. Some interpretations suggest that all moments exist equally, and that our experience of “now” is tied to consciousness rather than cosmic structure. This does not mean time is fake in any practical sense. Much like money or language, time could be real because it is useful—even if it is not written into the deepest laws of nature. Why This Revolution Is Happening Quietly Unlike discoveries of new particles or cosmic explosions, this shift in thinking is largely mathematical and conceptual. It unfolds in academic papers, conferences, and theoretical debates rather than laboratories. There is also no single theory that has “proven” time is an illusion. Instead, multiple independent lines of research point in the same unsettling direction. Physicists are cautious. Questioning time itself is not something done lightly. Does This Change Anything for Everyday Life? For now, the answer is no—at least not practically. Time will continue to govern schedules, aging, and physics experiments. But conceptually, this revolution matters deeply. It forces us to rethink what reality is made of and whether our most basic intuitions are shaped more by human perception than by the universe itself. Just as relativity changed how we think about space and simultaneity, a timeless foundation of physics could reshape our understanding of existence. Conclusion: A Universe Without Time? The idea that time may not be fundamental challenges centuries of thought. Yet physics has a long history of overturning what once seemed obvious. Whether time is an illusion, an emergent phenomenon, or something we have not yet fully understood, the quiet revolution underway suggests one thing clearly: our understanding of reality is far from complete. In questioning time itself, physics is once again reminding us that the universe is stranger—and more fascinating—than common sense would ever suggest.
By Aarif Lashariabout 23 hours ago in The Swamp
“I Took a 25% Pay Cut to Dodge the £100k Tax Trap”
The Costly Tax Threshold For many high-earning professionals, navigating the UK tax system can be a minefield. One taxpayer recently revealed a bold decision: taking a 25% pay cut to avoid exceeding the £100,000 income threshold, which triggers a higher tax rate and reduces personal allowances. This move highlights how tax thresholds can influence life-changing financial decisions, sometimes in unexpected ways. The £100,000 mark in the UK tax code is a notorious tipping point. Once income exceeds this threshold, personal allowance is gradually withdrawn, effectively increasing the marginal tax rate and making each additional pound earned less worthwhile. For some, it’s more financially prudent to earn slightly less to maintain a better overall net income. Understanding the £100k Tax Trap The so-called “£100k tax trap” works like this: Every individual in the UK has a personal allowance, currently around £12,570, which is the portion of income not subject to tax. When income exceeds £100,000, the personal allowance is reduced by £1 for every £2 earned over the threshold. Effectively, the marginal tax rate in this range can reach 60%, considering income tax and national insurance combined. This creates a unique dilemma for high earners: earning more can actually leave less money in your pocket once the allowance is withdrawn. A 25% Pay Cut by Choice The worker in question—who requested anonymity—decided to reduce their salary by a quarter to remain below the £100,000 threshold. "It wasn’t an easy decision," they explained. "But I realised that by earning more, I’d actually lose a significant portion to taxes. Cutting my pay meant I kept more of what I earned overall and avoided the financial penalty." This choice highlights a surprising truth: sometimes less is more in a tax system with abrupt thresholds. By voluntarily reducing income, the individual maximized their net take-home pay and minimized exposure to the punitive tax band. The Human Side of Tax Planning While tax planning is often seen as a dry or technical topic, stories like this demonstrate the real-world impact on people’s lives and choices. Workers don’t make decisions solely based on ambition—they also consider financial stability, lifestyle, and the consequences of higher taxation. Choosing a pay cut may come with sacrifices, such as reduced retirement contributions, smaller bonuses, or lower savings capacity. Yet, for many, it is a calculated trade-off: keeping more of what they earn now versus chasing a gross figure that results in disproportionately higher taxes. How Common Is This Decision? High earners navigating the UK tax system often face this dilemma. Financial advisors report that the £100k threshold causes some professionals to: Delay promotions or bonus acceptance Reduce overtime or consultancy work Adjust freelance income or dividends It’s not necessarily about greed or mismanagement—it’s about adapting behavior to the system. People naturally respond to incentives, nand a steep marginal tax rate can discourage additional work, even if they are capable of earning more. Experts Weigh In Financial experts note that the £100k threshold is a classic example of a policy-created distortion in behavior. John Matthews, a tax adviser, explained: "This is an example of how the system unintentionally discourages income growth within certain ranges. Taxpayers respond rationally to high marginal rates, sometimes choosing to work less or restructure income to remain below the threshold." Economists argue that such tax cliffs can reduce productivity and distort career decisions. Instead of simply rewarding merit or experience, the system may inadvertently incentivize artificial reductions in income. The Broader Implications The story of taking a pay cut to avoid the £100k trap also raises questions about the fairness and design of tax policy: Are steep marginal rates discouraging growth or ambition? Do such thresholds push workers to make financial decisions that may not align with their career goals? How can policymakers design systems that are fair, predictable, and incentivize work without unintended consequences? The anecdote is a reminder that tax systems are not just numbers—they affect real choices and lifestyles. Individuals respond logically to rules, sometimes in ways policymakers never intended. Lessons for Workers For those approaching high-income thresholds, the key takeaway is planning and awareness: Understand the tax brackets and personal allowances to know when marginal rates spike. Consider net income, not just gross salary, when evaluating promotions, bonuses, or job offers. Explore alternatives such as pension contributions or charitable donations to reduce taxable income legally. Consult a financial adviser to make strategic decisions that maximize take-home pay and long-term benefits. Being proactive can help individuals avoid surprises and make informed career and financial choices. Conclusion The story of an individual taking a 25% pay cut to dodge the £100k tax trap illustrates a striking reality: tax thresholds can influence major life decisions, sometimes in counterintuitive ways. While it may seem unusual to sacrifice income intentionally, the choice is a rational response to a system that penalizes incremental earnings in a specific range. Beyond the individual case, this scenario highlights broader discussions about tax fairness, incentives, and policy design. For workers, it’s a reminder that careful planning and understanding of the tax system can be just as important as career advancement or salary increases. In the end, navigating the £100k tax trap isn’t just about numbers—it’s about strategy, foresight, and balancing ambition with financial sense. For some, earning less can indeed mean taking home more.
By Aarif Lashari6 days ago in The Swamp
One Hard Thing
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: You have the number, you know your schedule- you’ve even picked out the perfect day and time to make this appointment. Shoot, you’ve even picked out alternative days and times just in case their schedules can’t accommodate you!
By Taylor Rigsby6 days ago in Motivation
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.