It’s Not Monday, But It’s Not Friday Yet Either
Living in the In-Between
There is a peculiar emotional space in the middle of the week. It’s not Monday, with its fresh starts and reluctant alarm clocks. But it’s also not Friday, with its promise of rest, release, and reward. It’s the in-between—the stretch of time where momentum exists, but excitement feels distant.
“It’s not Monday but it’s not Friday yet either” perfectly captures that shared human experience: the quiet endurance of the middle days, when life feels suspended between obligation and anticipation.
The Psychology of Midweek Limbo
Psychologists often describe midweek as a period of emotional neutrality or fatigue. The motivation that comes with starting something new has faded, but the satisfaction of completion hasn’t arrived. This can leave people feeling restless, unfocused, or mildly unfulfilled.
Unlike Mondays, which are clearly disliked, or Fridays, which are celebrated, midweek days lack a strong identity. They are functional, necessary, and often overlooked—yet they make up a significant portion of our lives.
Why the Middle Feels Heavier
The middle of anything often feels longer than the beginning or the end. This applies to weeks, projects, relationships, and even personal growth. When there’s no clear starting point to energize us and no visible finish line to motivate us, time can feel stretched.
Midweek workdays are when inboxes pile up, meetings repeat themselves, and routines feel mechanical. There’s no dramatic pressure, but there’s also no immediate relief. This combination can create a subtle emotional weight.
The Cultural Obsession With Ends and Beginnings
Modern culture celebrates beginnings and endings. New Year’s resolutions, fresh starts, grand finales, weekends, vacations, and milestones all receive attention and praise. The middle, by contrast, is treated as something to “get through.”
But life doesn’t actually happen at the edges. It happens in the middle—in the ordinary hours, routine conversations, and unremarkable days that quietly shape who we become.
Midweek as a Mirror of Life
The phrase “It’s not Monday but it’s not Friday yet either” can also be read as a metaphor for adulthood. Many people find themselves feeling similarly about life itself—not at the beginning, not near the end, but somewhere in between.
In this space, expectations collide with reality. Dreams may have evolved, responsibilities have increased, and the excitement of firsts has been replaced by the challenge of consistency. Yet this is also where depth, resilience, and self-awareness are built.
Productivity Without Passion
Midweek is often when productivity is highest—but passion is lowest. Tasks get done out of necessity rather than enthusiasm. This can feel discouraging, but it’s also a reminder that discipline often matters more than motivation.
Not every day will feel inspiring. Some days exist simply to be completed. Recognizing this can reduce frustration and help people treat themselves with more patience.
Finding Meaning in the Ordinary
There is quiet power in learning to appreciate the “nothing special” days. A calm commute, a routine lunch, a small personal win, or a moment of laughter can exist unnoticed if we’re always waiting for Friday.
Midweek teaches us how to find meaning without spectacle. It invites us to slow down, notice details, and understand that contentment doesn’t always arrive with celebration—it often arrives with acceptance.
The Role of Anticipation
Part of what makes midweek difficult is anticipation. Friday is close enough to imagine but far enough to feel unreachable. This can create impatience rather than motivation.
However, anticipation can also be reframed. Instead of focusing on what’s missing, midweek can be a time to prepare—mentally, emotionally, and practically—for what’s ahead.
Redefining the Middle
What if the middle didn’t have to feel like waiting? What if it became a place of grounding instead of restlessness?
Small shifts—like setting personal goals unrelated to work, practicing mindfulness, or creating midweek rituals—can transform these days from something endured into something experienced.
A quiet evening walk. A favorite midweek meal. A short break to reconnect with yourself. These moments give the middle its own identity.
Social Media and the Myth of Constant Excitement
Social media often amplifies the belief that life should always be exciting, productive, or joyful. But most people spend most of their time in the middle—working, managing responsibilities, and navigating routine.
Recognizing that “not Monday and not Friday” is normal can reduce comparison and self-judgment. It reminds us that ordinary days are not wasted days.
Embracing the In-Between
The middle of the week, like the middle of life, asks for endurance, balance, and perspective. It doesn’t offer fireworks or closure—but it offers stability.
There is strength in showing up when nothing special is happening. There is growth in consistency. There is value in days that simply exist.
Conclusion
“It’s not Monday but it’s not Friday yet either” is more than a passing thought—it’s a reflection of how many people experience time, work, and life itself. The in-between days may not be exciting, but they are essential.
If we learn to honor the middle instead of rushing through it, we may discover that these quiet spaces hold the most truth, the most growth, and the most real versions of ourselves.
Life isn’t just lived at the beginning or the end.
It’s lived right here—in the middle.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Aarif Lashari and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Fields of Fetor and Destruction
“Fields of Fetor and Destruction” is a phrase that evokes more than physical devastation. It speaks of landscapes scarred by neglect, conflict, pollution, and human indifference, where once-fertile ground now bears the stench of decay and the visible marks of ruin. Across the world, such fields exist not only as geographic locations but as symbols of deeper moral and environmental failure.
By Aarif Lasharia day ago in The Swamp
By Dumping Tonnes of Sand into the Ocean for 12 Years, China Has Created Brand New Islands from Scratch
Imagine looking out over the South China Sea and seeing islands that weren’t there a decade ago. That’s exactly what’s happening. For 12 years, China has been dredging millions of tonnes of sand from the seabed and dumping it onto shallow reefs. The result? Massive artificial islands with runways, harbors, and even radar systems — entirely built from scratch. It’s an extraordinary engineering achievement. But it’s also a deeply controversial story that touches on geopolitics, environmental damage, and international law. How Do You Build an Island From the Ocean? The process is intense, complicated, and massive in scale. Specialized ships called cutter-suction dredgers scoop up sand and crushed coral from the seabed. That slurry is pumped through pipelines onto reefs, layer by layer, until the area rises above the high-tide line. Once land starts forming, engineers reinforce it with rock and concrete to protect it from storms. Roads, runways, and harbors soon appear, along with radar and communication systems. What was once just a coral reef becomes a fully functional island capable of hosting military aircraft and ships. From a technical standpoint, it’s impressive. From an environmental and geopolitical standpoint, it’s far more complex. Why These Islands Matter The South China Sea is one of the most strategic waterways in the world. About one-third of global maritime shipping passes through here every year, and the sea is rich in oil, gas, and fish. Several countries — including Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, and Taiwan — have claims in the region. China, however, claims almost the entire South China Sea under the so-called “nine-dash line.” Artificial islands give China a physical presence in contested waters, turning submerged reefs into military and logistical hubs. Once an island has a runway or a port, it changes the balance of power. It’s no longer just sand; it’s a foothold that can influence maritime traffic, regional security, and international diplomacy. From Coral Gardens to Concrete Islands There’s a darker side to this story. These islands are built on coral reefs — ecosystems that took thousands of years to form. Dredging and dumping sand destroys these reefs almost instantly. Sediment plumes cloud the water, smothering coral and blocking sunlight. Fish nurseries vanish, and entire marine ecosystems collapse. Nearby fishing communities in countries like the Philippines and Vietnam report lower catches as fish populations decline. What was once a thriving marine environment becomes, for many species, a barren landscape. Geopolitical Tensions Artificial islands aren’t just about sand and concrete; they’re about power projection. Once they host ports, airstrips, and radar systems, they act like permanent military outposts in the middle of contested waters. Even after a 2016 international tribunal ruled that China’s expansive claims were legally invalid, Beijing continued construction. Its neighbors are responding: Vietnam has built its own artificial islands, and the U.S. conducts freedom-of-navigation operations to challenge China’s dominance. These islands are flashpoints for tension, with ships and planes moving constantly to assert influence. What began as an engineering project has become a high-stakes geopolitical chessboard. Legal Questions According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), artificial islands do not generate territorial waters or exclusive economic zones. So technically, China cannot claim surrounding seas just because it built land there. But in practice, perception matters. Once an island is equipped with infrastructure and personnel, it becomes a de facto presence that is difficult to ignore. Countries, ships, and planes start operating around it, effectively shifting influence without officially changing borders. International law is struggling to keep up with technological possibilities. Creating new land from the ocean wasn’t something lawmakers imagined when defining maritime rights. Environmental and Strategic Impacts The environmental consequences are serious: coral reefs, fish populations, and coastal ecosystems are destroyed. Yet these islands also reshape the geopolitical map. They allow China to extend its reach in the South China Sea, assert military presence, and strengthen supply chains across contested waters. This raises a broader question: how should the world balance technological innovation with environmental protection and international norms? Artificial islands like these may be an engineering triumph, but they come with costs that ripple across oceans and generations. The Takeaway China’s decade-long project to create islands from the sea is more than a feat of engineering. It’s a story about power, ambition, and the lengths nations will go to secure influence. These islands are now military bases, geopolitical tools, and environmental scars all at once. As technology advances, creating land where none existed will become easier. But the lessons of the South China Sea are clear: reshaping the earth may give a country strategic advantages, but it also disrupts ecosystems, challenges international law, and sparks regional tension. Sand and sea may seem endless, but the consequences of building on top of them will last for generations.
By Muhammad Hassan2 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.