Federal Employees Directed to Identify DEI Colleagues or Face Penalties
"Trump Administration Targets DEIA Programs, Sparking Controversy Among Federal Employees"
Federal employees in the United States have been instructed to report colleagues working in diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) roles, or face potential repercussions for failing to comply. This directive was issued on Wednesday via emails sent to workers across multiple government agencies. The move comes as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to eliminate DEIA-related programs in federal institutions.
The Directive
The emails, obtained by NBC News, informed federal employees that they must report any DEIA-related positions or changes to job descriptions that may have gone unnoticed by supervisors. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which oversees federal employment policies, issued a memo on Tuesday, requiring department heads to send the notice to their employees by Wednesday at 5 p.m.
The message in the emails warned employees that they could face "adverse consequences" for failing to report information about DEIA roles within 10 days. However, it also assured workers that those who provide the requested information promptly would not face penalties.
"We are aware of efforts by some in government to disguise these programs by using coded or imprecise language," the email read. Employees were instructed to notify the OPM of any changes to contracts or job descriptions that might obscure connections to DEIA-related ideologies or initiatives.
Trump’s Stance on DEIA Programs
The directive aligns with a series of actions taken by the Trump administration to dismantle DEIA programs in federal agencies. President Trump, in an executive order signed on his first day back in office, called for the elimination of "mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities" associated with DEIA within the federal government.
According to the OPM’s template letter sent to agency heads, Trump’s administration described DEIA programs as divisive, wasteful, and discriminatory. The letter stated, “These programs divided Americans by race, wasted taxpayer dollars, and resulted in shameful discrimination.”
Trump also directed that federal employees working in DEIA-related roles be placed on paid leave by the end of the workday on Wednesday.
Rolling Back Protections and Affirmative Action
The crackdown on DEIA programs is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to reverse policies aimed at promoting diversity and protecting marginalized groups.
Earlier this week, Trump signed another executive order limiting the government’s recognition of genders to only male and female, effectively dismissing nonbinary and gender nonconforming individuals. This decision has sparked concerns about the erasure of LGBTQ+ rights and the exclusion of nonbinary individuals from federal protections.
Additionally, Trump revoked a decades-old executive order that required federal contractors to prohibit discrimination and practice affirmative action. The revoked order previously ensured protection against discrimination based on race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and national origin in workplaces that received federal contracts.
Uncertainty and Pushback
The language in the emails has raised concerns among federal employees, particularly over the term “adverse consequences.” The White House has not clarified what specific penalties employees might face for failing to report DEIA positions or changes in job descriptions. It is also unclear how these rules will be enforced across agencies and departments.
While the OPM provided a standardized template for agencies to distribute, it remains unknown whether all agencies followed the same wording or if some omitted the language regarding DEIA reporting requirements.
Impact on Federal Employees and DEIA Advocates
The directive has created tension within federal workplaces, with employees caught between adhering to the new rules and standing by their colleagues in DEIA roles. Critics argue that the directive not only undermines the importance of fostering diverse and inclusive workplaces but also creates a culture of surveillance and fear among workers.
DEIA advocates warn that dismantling such programs could have far-reaching consequences, including reduced workplace equity, increased discrimination, and a loss of progress made in creating inclusive environments.
A Broader Pattern of Anti-Diversity Efforts
This latest move is part of a series of actions by the Trump administration aimed at rolling back diversity initiatives. Critics note that these efforts reflect a growing trend of anti-diversity policies that seek to limit the representation and rights of marginalized groups in federal institutions and beyond.
The dismantling of DEIA programs has been met with concern from civil rights organizations, LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, and proponents of workplace equity. Many argue that these policies play a critical role in addressing systemic inequalities and ensuring fairness in hiring and workplace practices.
Looking Ahead
As the federal government enforces these new directives, the broader implications of dismantling DEIA programs remain uncertain. While the Trump administration frames these actions as cost-saving measures to prevent discrimination, opponents view them as a step backward in the fight for equality and inclusion.
The directives issued this week signal a stark shift in federal policy, emphasizing traditional values over progressive efforts to promote diversity and accessibility. As employees navigate this new environment, questions about the long-term impact on workplace culture and equity will undoubtedly persist.
About the Creator
What Is the Old Name of Turkey? A Journey Through History, Empires, and Identity
When people hear the name Turkey, they often think of a modern nation bridging Europe and Asia, rich with culture, cuisine, and history. But Turkey’s land has carried many names long before it became the Republic of Türkiye in the 20th century. Understanding the old names of Turkey is more than a geography lesson—it is a journey through ancient civilizations, powerful empires, and shifting identities that shaped the world. Anatolia: The Earliest Known Name The oldest and most widely used historical name for much of modern-day Turkey is Anatolia. Derived from the Greek word Anatolē, meaning “the east” or “sunrise,” Anatolia referred to the lands east of mainland Greece. For ancient Greeks, this region was literally where the sun rose. Anatolia was not a single kingdom but a vast region that hosted some of the world’s earliest civilizations, including the Hittites, Phrygians, Lydians, and Urartians. Archaeological discoveries show that Anatolia was a cradle of early human settlement, agriculture, and trade, making it one of the most historically dense regions on Earth. Even today, historians and scholars frequently use “Anatolia” to describe Turkey’s Asian portion, which makes up about 97% of the country. Asia Minor: A Roman and Byzantine Label Another well-known old name for Turkey is Asia Minor. This term was popularized during the Roman and Byzantine Empires to distinguish the region from the larger continent of Asia. “Asia Minor” literally means “Lesser Asia,” emphasizing its role as a western extension of the Asian landmass. Under Roman and later Byzantine rule, Asia Minor became a hub of administration, commerce, and Christianity. Many early Christian communities, councils, and churches—mentioned in biblical texts—were located in this region. Cities like Ephesus, Smyrna, and Nicaea were central to religious and political life for centuries. Constantinople and the Byzantine Identity While the land itself had regional names, the capital city—Constantinople—often symbolized the entire territory. Founded by Roman Emperor Constantine the Great in 330 AD, Constantinople became the heart of the Byzantine Empire. For over a thousand years, the Byzantine Empire ruled much of what is now Turkey, blending Roman governance, Greek culture, and Christian theology. During this period, the region was not called Turkey at all, as the term “Turk” had not yet become dominant in Anatolia. The Arrival of the Turks and the Name “Turkey” The name Turkey comes from the word “Turk”, referring to the Turkic peoples who migrated from Central Asia. After the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, Seljuk Turks defeated the Byzantine army, opening Anatolia to Turkish settlement. Over time, European sources began referring to the region as “Turcia” or “Turkey,” meaning “the land of the Turks.” This marked a major shift in identity—from a Greco-Roman-Christian region to a predominantly Turkic and Muslim one. The Ottoman Empire: A Global Power Without the Name “Turkey” Interestingly, during the height of Turkish power, the state was not officially called Turkey. Instead, it was known as the Ottoman Empire, named after its founder Osman I. From the late 13th century until the early 20th century, the Ottoman Empire controlled vast territories across Europe, Asia, and Africa. Ottoman rulers referred to their realm as the Devlet-i Aliyye-i Osmaniye (The Sublime Ottoman State). However, European diplomats and writers still casually referred to the empire’s core lands as Turkey, reinforcing the name internationally. From Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Turkey After World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk led a successful independence movement. In 1923, the modern Republic of Turkey was officially established. This marked the first time “Turkey” became the formal name of the state, symbolizing a break from imperial rule and the beginning of a secular, nation-based identity. In recent years, the country has also emphasized the spelling “Türkiye” internationally to reflect its native pronunciation and cultural identity. Why These Old Names Still Matter The old names of Turkey—Anatolia, Asia Minor, Byzantine lands, and Ottoman domains—tell a story of continuity and transformation. They reveal how geography, culture, religion, and power shape national identity over time. Turkey is not just a modern nation-state; it is a living archive of human civilization. Each old name represents a chapter in its long and complex story, making Turkey one of the most historically layered countries in the world. Final Thoughts So, what is the old name of Turkey? The answer depends on the era. From Anatolia and Asia Minor to Byzantine territories and the Ottoman Empire, Turkey has worn many names—each reflecting the people and powers of its time. Understanding these names helps us appreciate Turkey not just as a country, but as a crossroads of civilizations that continues to influence global history today.
By Fiazahmedbrohi a day ago in The Swamp
Center Stage with Paul Stewart
*** I'm keen to republish the interviews I did for my series with Vocal creators. It's been a few years and I thought it might be nice to revisit these wonderful conversations. I'll be releasing them one at a time for a few weeks/months.
By Heather Hublera day ago in Interview
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.