College Student Pretends to Be A Trump Supporter for College Funds
These trumpers been fucked and sucked by a college student pretending to be a trump supporter.
This is one of the most hilarious and smartest stories I have ever read.
A Black College Student was showing her support for Trump until her family cut her off and cut her tuition money with nowhere to turn to she turned to social media with the maga family donating her funds on Gofundme until a shocking revelation shows that she never really actually supported Trump.
Here’s the whole story.....
It started on October 27, Quran was on X formerly Twitter created her Twitter account under the name Princess Quran aka Reformed Republican. She tweeted that she can no longer be a liberal and wants to be a Republican. Quran decided to support Donald Trump by tweeting:
“I will no longer hide it, the left made us feel as if black republicans should hide!! But not anymore. #BlacksforTrump #walkaway #maga
Posted on October 27, 2018
She posted a selfie of herself with a MAGA hat. After she tweeted showing her tweets showing her support for Trump and being part of the Republican Party, She explained that her parents cut her off after reading her social media revelation and asked kind people online to help her to fund her education via a GoFundMe link. When her page reached its goal, Quran admitted to BuzzFeed News over Twitter DM that she made up the entire event including the screenshotted texts with her mom. GoFundMe confirmed to BuzzFeed News that they've returned all funds to donors after Quran admitted that she was not a Trump supporter.
Quran’s shunned black Republican character was born after she found the MAGA hat lying around the campus of Howard University, where she studies art history. Next, she says she decided to take a photo to criticize actual black Trump supporters. After reading her story about pretending to be a Trump supporter for college tuition, I was astonished how she did it and I thought how brilliant it was to trick the Trump supporters. I mean those trumpers were such suckers for paying this young woman money. If the Conservatives think that it is a problem or that she is a fraud. Guess what? Conservatives are the same way too. For instance, Former Bachelorette star Josh Seiter was pretending to be a transgender woman and honestly, I wasn’t buying the whole trying-to-be transgender thing he is playing because I knew in my gut he was gaslighting himself as a joke.
Josh would put on makeup and women’s clothing which made him really unattractive. Plus, he was on social media acting like a female in weird feminity voice. After a while of him dressing like a woman and acting like a woman, Conservative comedian Alex Stein who got Josh on his show Prime Time with Alex Stein. Seiter revealed he was never transgender and that it was only an experience. Just to experience life as a so called transgender woman. Alex and other conservative content cretors thought of Josh pretending to be trans was “brilliant” “genius” and “smart experience”.
Unlike Josh, I thought it was absolutely smart as fuck for what she did. I mean it made me realize do these supposed Black Conservatives support republicans just for the payment, fame, “Christian” faith religion, or the benefits of being a Republican. So if you thought that this was okay, then joke is on you why can’t it be OK for Democrats to do the same but whatever It is what it is.
What do you think should she go to jail for fraud or better yet let her go????
Do you think she was smart for pretending to be a Trump supporter?
Comment below
About the Creator
Gladys W. Muturi
Hello, My name is Gladys W. Muturi. I am an Actress, Writer, Filmmaker, Producer, and Mother of 1.
Instagram: @gladys_muturi95
Facebook: facebook.com/gladystheactress
YouTube: @gladys_muturi
COMING SOON TALES & CONFESSIONS OF HIGH SCHOOL
Keep reading
More stories from Gladys W. Muturi and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
If Charlie Kirk was Black Republican
Ever since Charlie Kirk’s assassination, things have gone haywire. Half were saddened by this god awful tragedy, half were stunned, and the other half celebrated his death. After the assassination, Trump ordered that the flag of the United States be flown at half-staff at the White House, on all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions, as a mark of respect for Kirk. The order remained in effect until sunset on September 14.
By Gladys W. Muturi4 months ago in The Swamp
Trump Pushes for a 1-Year, 10% Cap on Credit Card Interest Rates — and Banks Push Back
In a move that has reignited debate over consumer protection and financial regulation, former U.S. President Donald Trump has floated a proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year. The idea is simple on its surface: provide immediate relief to millions of Americans struggling under high-interest debt. But the reaction from banks and financial institutions has been swift and hostile, revealing deep divisions over how the U.S. credit system should function. At a time when credit card interest rates in the United States routinely exceed 20% and, in some cases, climb above 30%, Trump’s proposal strikes a populist chord. Yet critics argue that such a cap could disrupt lending markets, reduce credit availability, and create unintended economic consequences. So why is Trump pushing this plan, why are banks balking, and what could it mean for consumers? Why Credit Card Interest Rates Are Under the Spotlight Over the past few years, American households have increasingly relied on credit cards to cope with inflation, rising rent, and higher everyday expenses. As the Federal Reserve raised benchmark interest rates to fight inflation, credit card APRs surged alongside them. For many consumers, this has meant: Growing balances that are harder to pay down Monthly interest charges that exceed minimum payments A cycle of debt that feels nearly impossible to escape Against this backdrop, Trump’s proposal taps into widespread frustration. By capping interest rates at 10% for a limited, one-year period, the plan aims to give borrowers breathing room and slow the growth of household debt. The Political Strategy Behind the Proposal Trump has long positioned himself as a champion of “forgotten” or financially stressed Americans. This proposal fits neatly into that narrative, allowing him to argue that he is standing up to powerful banks on behalf of everyday consumers. Politically, the idea is strategic: It appeals to working-class voters burdened by debt It contrasts sharply with what many see as Wall Street-friendly policies It reframes economic debate around fairness rather than market efficiency Even though the proposal is temporary, its symbolism is powerful. A one-year cap suggests urgency without committing to a permanent overhaul of the credit system, making it easier to sell to voters while still appearing bold. Why Banks Are Pushing Back Hard Financial institutions wasted no time expressing concern. From their perspective, a 10% cap—especially one imposed quickly—poses serious risks. Banks’ main arguments include: 1. Reduced profitability Credit cards are one of the most profitable products for banks. Interest revenue helps offset defaults, fraud, and operational costs. A sharp cap would significantly reduce margins. 2. Higher risk, lower reward Banks argue that high interest rates compensate for lending to higher-risk borrowers. If rates are capped, they may simply stop offering credit to those consumers. 3. Less access to credit Rather than lowering rates, banks could tighten approval standards, leaving many Americans—especially those with lower credit scores—without access to credit at all. 4. Market interference concerns The banking industry maintains that interest rates should reflect market conditions, not political decisions. They warn that government-imposed caps distort lending behavior. In short, banks claim the proposal could hurt the very people it intends to help. Would Consumers Actually Benefit? For consumers carrying balances, the immediate benefits are obvious. A 10% cap could: Dramatically reduce monthly interest charges Help borrowers pay down principal faster Prevent balances from ballooning However, the longer-term impact is less clear. If banks respond by: Cutting credit limits Closing accounts Rejecting new applicants Then access to short-term credit could become more limited, particularly for lower-income households. Still, supporters argue that the current system already fails many consumers. With interest rates exceeding 25%, critics say the credit card market borders on exploitative, especially when borrowers are already financially vulnerable. How This Fits Into the Broader Economic Debate Trump’s proposal revives a long-standing debate in U.S. politics: Should there be a legal limit on how much lenders can charge? Historically, usury laws capped interest rates at the state level. Over time, deregulation and federal preemption weakened those limits, allowing banks to charge far higher rates nationwide. The proposal also intersects with broader questions about: Corporate responsibility Income inequality The role of government in regulating financial markets Supporters see the cap as overdue consumer protection. Opponents see it as economic overreach with potentially destabilizing effects. Is the Proposal Likely to Become Law? Realistically, the chances of this policy being enacted in its current form are slim—at least in the short term. Implementing a nationwide cap would require congressional support and face intense lobbying from the financial industry. However, even if it never becomes law, the proposal serves another purpose: shifting the conversation. By putting credit card interest rates front and center, Trump has forced policymakers, banks, and the public to confront an issue that often receives little attention. In that sense, the plan may already be achieving one of its goals. What Happens Next? As banks continue to push back and economists debate the consequences, consumers are watching closely. Whether through legislation or public pressure, calls for relief from high credit card interest rates are unlikely to fade. Trump’s proposal may be temporary, controversial, and politically charged—but it highlights a reality many Americans live with every day: debt is expensive, and the system often feels stacked against borrowers. Even if the 10% cap never materializes, the question remains: how long can sky-high interest rates persist before meaningful reform becomes unavoidable?
By Muhammad Hassan7 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.