Black People On The Run After Donald Trump Did This To Illegal Foreigners In New York City, US
The new president of United State of America, Donald Trump have heavily embarked on tightening the immigration standards of the country.
The Donald Trump's regime have began a coordinated effort by the U.S immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to embark on a pivotal raids in New York City on Tuesday, 28th January. This activity comes with effect of the presidency's implementation of a new law aimed at regulating the immigration department and cracking down illegal foreigners in the country.
After his inauguration last week, Donald Trump signed 10 executive orders on immigration and border security enhancement. His resolute commitment to clampdown this issue have seen the ICE raids in New York City today with the agencies working tirelessly to scrutinize and arrest undocumented foreign nationals in United State.
According to NBCNewYork.com, notable presence such as U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem were recorded as a testament to the efforts channeled to the administration's policy. With the full involvement of Secretary Neom in the ongoing activity, the gravity of the officials and locals would be greatly impacted on a note to do better.
Moreover, the ICE raids in New York City would serve as a a reminder to the illegal immigrants inhabiting the city to either do the needful or face the law when apprehended. On a contrary, the right of every individuals would be respected and agencies are expected to work in compliance as well.
Below are people's comments on the case:
'Black people deserve to be jailed for 10 years and deported back to their various countries for the lots of atrocities committed in United States of America'— Hass.
'President Donald Trump is doing so well in his first months at office with the immigration matter. United States have been massively occupied by illegal immigrants and the past government seems not to be bothered by it'—Abass.
'With the aret at which ICE are raiding states and communities fishing out immigrants without proper documentation to stay in United States, we might be heading to a safe and sane society for the past 50 years'— Leo Mark.
Here are reasons to ICE raids in the United States:
1. *Concerns about ICE tactics*: The Immigrant Defense Project has launched "ICEwatch," an interactive map detailing ICE's deceptive and aggressive tactics, including summaries of over 1300 raids ¹. This initiative aims to shed light on ICE practices and equip individuals with knowledge to exercise their constitutional rights.
2. *ICE's enforcement priorities*: ICE prioritizes enforcement actions based on agency and department priorities, funding, and capacity. They focus on individuals who pose threats to national security or public safety, or those who undermine the integrity of U.S. immigration laws.
3. *Alternatives to Detention*: ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program uses technology and case management to monitor individuals, ensuring compliance with release conditions and court hearings. This approach allows participants to remain in their communities while navigating the immigration process.
4. *The impact of ICE raids on families*: ICE raids can have devastating effects on families, particularly those with mixed immigration status. The sudden removal of a family member can lead to emotional trauma, financial instability, and uncertainty about the future.
5. *Debate around ICE's role in immigration enforcement*: The role of ICE in immigration enforcement has been a topic of controversy. Some argue that ICE is essential for maintaining national security and public safety, while others contend that the agency's tactics are overly aggressive and inhumane.
6. *Community responses to ICE raids*: In response to ICE raids, many communities have established support networks, providing resources and services to affected individuals and families. These initiatives often involve collaboration between local organizations, advocacy groups, and law enforcement agencies.
7. *The need for transparency and accountability*: There is a growing call for increased transparency and accountability within ICE, particularly regarding their tactics and treatment of detainees. This includes demands for improved access to information, independent oversight, and measures to prevent human rights abuses.
Article source: NBCNewYork.com
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Hassan Arewa and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Why The U.S Congress Can't Declare War On Russia
Due to the bold step took by Russia's President, Vladimir Putin, to invade Ukraine, the US President has ever since labelled Putin a war criminal. The situation between Russia and Ukraine is a little bit complex, and there have been different perspectives on the reasons behind the conflict since it started. A heavy protest ensued in Ukraine in 2014 against the government of then, which saw President Viktor Yanukovych, who was seen as pro-Russian removed from power in 2014, and a pro-Western government took over. That was when Russia started supporting separatists in eastern Ukraine who wanted to break away from the rest of the country and establish a pro-Russian state. However, the conflict escalated, with both sides accusing the other of aggression and violating ceasefires. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which it claimed was to protect Russian-speaking Ukrainians and Russian interests in the region. This step took by Russia's President, Vladimir Putin, made 5he international community condemn Russia’s actions and imposed economic sanctions on Russia. Ever since, Vladimir Putin has been labeled a war criminal for commiting genocide in Ukraine. Have you ever thought for a moment why the United States is reluctant to intervene with their Military, despite providing Ukraine with millions if not billions of dollars? A military intervention by U.S.A will be a declaration of war against Russia, which I think the Russian government is fully prepared for. Russia is one of the country that makes up BRICS. Being an ally to China, South Africa, Brazil and India is a huge win for Russia. More and more countries are applying to join BRICS, as Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were invited earlier this year to join. America has been careful enough not to involve it's military in the Russia war against Ukraine. Israel-Gaza war is a typical example of the minimum casualties that will be suffered by both parties if the U.S declares war on Russia. The U.S congress won't declare war on Russia because, asking to deal with Russia once and for all through invasion, means that they have to invade Russia which will see a lot of Russians dead thus committing genocide. No matter how deluded and crazy the world is, the moment you do that, you’ll be recognized as an equivalent of a nazi germany, and threat to everybody. Most importantly, wars are a last resort, for when all diplomatic means have been exhausted and no agreement can be reached over a dispute. Even then, what is to be gained? Resources and lives lost far outweigh any possible gains through war. For the first time, the United States is facing two major nuclear powers, whose vital national security interests are in competition with the U.S. Both China and Russia have the means to threaten U.S. national security, but war with either is neither inevitable nor imminent If the United States wants to remain the most powerful nation on Earth, peace is to continue between the U.S., China and Russia. Like I said earlier, a war between the two is imminent judging by the look of things currently. There are several reasons why it will be disastrous if the U.S declares war on Russia, which i will explain in details below; Firstly, the United States and Russia possess the largest nuclear arsenals in the world, and any military conflict between the two countries would likely escalate into a catastrophic nuclear war, with devastating consequences for both nations and the entire world. Secondly, both the United States and Russia have allies in various parts of the world, and any military conflict between the two nations could potentially draw in other countries, leading to a wider and more destructive conflict. Thirdly, the United States and Russia have significant economic ties, and any disruption to trade or investment flows between the two countries could have serious economic consequences for both nations. Fourthly, a decision to go to war with Russia would require approval from the U.S. Congress and the American people, both of whom are generally wary of military intervention and the potential costs and consequences of such actions.There’re several reasons why it will be disastrous if the U.S declares war on Russia, which i will explain in details below; It will be a stupid but yet bold move if the U.S could declare war on Russia. The whole world whom rely on these two world power will be greatly affected if war breaks out between the two countries. To end the war will be very difficult but not entirely impossible.
By Hassan Arewa2 years ago in The Swamp
Greenland: Vance Warns Europe to Take Trump's Threats Seriously
The Greenland debate has escalated from a peculiar historical footnote to a contentious geopolitical issue in the 21st century. Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s interest in purchasing the world’s largest island has resurfaced, causing ripples not just in Washington but across Europe. In recent weeks, various experts and politicians have been warning Europe to take Trump’s ambitions seriously. One such figure, foreign policy expert Vance, has urged European leaders to prepare for what could be a challenging diplomatic situation. Trump’s Greenland Obsession: A Resurging Threat In 2019, Donald Trump made headlines by expressing interest in purchasing Greenland, a move that was met with widespread disbelief. The island, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark, was never up for sale, and Denmark’s leaders quickly rejected the idea. However, Trump's fixation on Greenland has never truly gone away. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, so does his interest in the island, which boasts significant natural resources and strategic importance. The Trump administration's stance on Greenland wasn’t just about territorial expansion; it was also linked to broader U.S. foreign policy goals. Greenland's location between North America and Europe has made it strategically vital, especially in the context of the Arctic’s changing geopolitical dynamics. The region’s rich mineral deposits, including rare earth metals and uranium, have further piqued global interest, and Trump’s desire to control Greenland was viewed by some as an attempt to secure these resources for American use. Vance’s Warning: Europe Needs to Prepare Vance, an experienced international relations expert, has recently sounded an alarm regarding the ongoing Greenland situation. His remarks focus on the dangers of underestimating Trump's intentions. According to Vance, Europe has largely brushed aside the possibility of a renewed push for Greenland, but that could be a fatal mistake. “I think Europe is making a grave error by assuming that Trump’s previous attempt was just a passing fancy,” Vance explained in a recent interview. “Given his track record and the growing importance of Greenland in global geopolitics, Europe must take this seriously and start preparing for all potential outcomes.” The warning isn’t just about the potential for Trump to try again. Vance also expressed concerns about how the U.S. might attempt to leverage its military presence in Greenland to sway Denmark and other European allies. The U.S. already operates the Thule Air Base in Greenland, a vital asset for its defense and intelligence capabilities in the Arctic. A stronger American presence, according to Vance, could lead to mounting pressure on Denmark to entertain the idea of a deal once more. The Danish and European Dilemma From a European perspective, the prospect of the U.S. attempting to purchase Greenland is a delicate issue. Denmark, as Greenland’s sovereign nation, would be the key decision-maker, but any move involving the island’s future could have far-reaching consequences for the entire European Union. For Denmark, the situation is complicated by both internal and external pressures. Greenland’s native Inuit population has expressed concerns about their cultural and political autonomy should the island fall under U.S. control. Meanwhile, many European leaders are wary of the growing tensions between the U.S. and Russia in the Arctic. The region has become a new frontier for geopolitical competition, with both superpowers seeking to establish dominance. Vance suggests that if the U.S. continues to press its case for Greenland, it could place Denmark in an awkward position. “The U.S. is not known for backing down when it has its sights set on something,” Vance warned. “Denmark’s ties to the EU and its own position in the Arctic are crucial, and the pressure from Washington could become overwhelming. Europe needs to think ahead about how it will respond.” The Strategic Significance of Greenland Greenland’s strategic value has only grown in recent years, as climate change continues to open up previously impassable routes and untapped resources. The Arctic’s melting ice has revealed new shipping lanes and access to minerals that were once inaccessible. Russia and China have already started to invest heavily in the region, both in terms of economic opportunities and military positioning. For the U.S., controlling Greenland would offer significant advantages. Not only would it solidify its presence in the Arctic, but it would also provide a staging ground for any future operations in Europe or the Northern Hemisphere. Moreover, access to Greenland’s vast natural resources could help America’s economic interests, reducing its dependence on foreign imports for key materials like rare earth elements. Vance argues that Europe needs to recognize the increasing importance of the Arctic in global power dynamics. “Europe cannot afford to overlook the Arctic anymore. It’s not just about climate change or environmental concerns; it’s a matter of global security,” he emphasized. “Europe must act quickly to secure its own interests in the region and ensure that it remains an equal player in the Arctic race.” Preparing for the Worst: A Call to Action As the situation with Greenland continues to develop, Vance’s advice to Europe is clear: preparation is key. He urges European governments to engage in strategic talks, not just with Denmark, but with other Arctic nations, to ensure that the region remains under international governance and not solely under U.S. influence. At the same time, Vance advises that Europe should bolster its defense and diplomatic efforts in the Arctic. Strengthening partnerships with key Arctic powers like Canada, Norway, and Sweden will be crucial in ensuring that Europe has a voice in any future discussions about Greenland’s status. Vance also stresses the importance of diplomatic engagement with the U.S. to mitigate the risks of any aggressive U.S. actions in the region. “Europe needs to have a unified response to Trump’s actions,” he said. “The stakes are high, and the time to act is now.” Conclusion: The Need for Global Cooperation As Trump’s ambitions toward Greenland continue to shape international discussions, it’s clear that this issue will have lasting ramifications for both the U.S. and Europe. Vance’s warning should not be taken lightly. Europe’s ability to navigate this complex geopolitical issue will require strong leadership, strategic foresight, and, above all, cooperation among European states and their allies. The future of Greenland may very well depend on how the global community responds to the growing power play in the Arctic. The coming months will undoubtedly test the resolve of European leaders and their ability to safeguard their interests in a rapidly changing world.
By Muhammad Hassan3 days ago in The Swamp
Comments (1)
Sad world we live in. I pray for clarity and peace.