A Frightening Reality
The Clear Signs Before the Appearance of Dajjal
We live in a time filled with trials and confusion. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) clearly warned us about the signs of the End Times, and among them, the greatest trial will be the appearance of Al-Masih ad-Dajjal — the False Messiah. He described Dajjal as the biggest deceiver in human history and urged us to seek protection from his fitnah.
In this article, we will explore the clear signs that will appear before Dajjal arrival, based on authentic Islamic sources.
1. Widespread Ignorance of Religion.
As the End Times approach, people will become increasingly unaware of Islamic knowledge. The Qur’an will be abandoned, hadiths will be forgotten, and many will identify as Muslims without practicing the religion. In such ignorance, people will be easily deceived by Dajjal’s lies.
2. Neglect of Prayer and Mosques.
The Prophet (PBUH) said that a time would come when people would stop attending congregational prayers. The mosques will be empty. In this state of spiritual weakness, people’s hearts will become vulnerable, making it easy for Dajjal to mislead them.
3. Dominance of Falsehood.
Lies will spread rapidly, and it will become difficult to distinguish between truth and falsehood. People will trust liars and doubt the truthful. This environment of confusion will allow Dajjal to present his false claims as truth.
4. Natural Disasters and Famine.
Before Dajjal appears, there will be extreme famine. Rain will stop, crops will fail, and people will suffer from hunger. During this hardship, Dajjal will offer food and wealth, which will attract many to follow him.
5. Wars and Global Unrest.
There will be great wars and widespread chaos in the world. Muslim unity will be shattered, and everyone will fight for personal gain. Dajjal will use this disorder to present himself as a false “savior.”
6. Weakening of Faith (Iman).
Although people will still call themselves Muslims, their hearts will be distant from Allah. They will chase wealth, fame, and power. When Dajjal shows his so-called “paradise” and “hell,” many will believe him out of fear or greed.
7. Truth Will Be Rejected.
People will begin accepting falsehood as truth and rejecting the actual truth. When Dajjal claims to be “god,” many will believe him without question due to their spiritual blindness.
🌟From Where Will Dajjal Emerge?
1. From the Land of Khorasan.
“Dajjal will emerge from the land of Khorasan. He will be followed by seventy thousand people with faces like shields.”
(Sunan Ibn Majah, Hadith: 4077)
Khorasan includes parts of present-day Iran, Afghanistan, and Turkmenistan.
2. From the East (Al-Mashriq).
“He will emerge from the East... He will emerge from the East...”
(Sahih Muslim, Hadith: 2942)
This confirms the direction of his emergence.
3. Currently Chained on an Island.
The hadith of Tamim ad-Dari (RA) describes Dajjal being chained on an island between Syria and Iran.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “That was the Dajjal.”
(Sahih Muslim, Hadith: 2942a)
🌟How Will Dajjal Appear?
1. He will first present himself as a righteous man.
2. He will perform false miracles — like bringing rain or reviving the dead.
3. Many people will be deceived and follow him.
4. Whoever believes in him will lose their faith.
5. He will finally be killed by Prophet Isa (peace be upon him) with the support of Imam Mahdi.
🌟What Will Dajjal Look Like?
A young man with red skin and curly hair.Blind in one eye — the eye will look like a swollen grape.The word “Kafir” will be written on his forehead, readable only by true believers.
Though he will perform strange miracles, his ugly appearance will expose his lies to those with strong faith.
🌟How to Protect Ourselves?
The signs of Dajjal’s arrival are already visible — loss of faith, spread of lies, and chaos in the world. But there is hope.
“Whoever memorizes the first ten verses of Surah Al-Kahf will be protected from Dajjal.”
(Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him)
“O Allah! Protect us all from the trials of Dajjal and every other fitnah. Keep our hearts firm on guidance. Grant us true faith and let us die as believers.”
Ameen
About the Creator
Mymuna✯✯
"A believer, a seeker, and a storyteller of faith. My words aim to uplift hearts and remind us of our ultimate destination!!💗✨
First Person Charged Under New Crossing Law: A Turning Point in Border Enforcement
The charging of the first individual under the newly introduced crossing law marks a significant moment in the government’s approach to border control and irregular migration. Designed to deter unauthorized crossings and strengthen enforcement, the new legislation represents a sharper legal response to a problem that has long dominated political debate, public concern, and humanitarian discourse. While officials describe the charge as a necessary step toward restoring control, critics warn it may signal deeper legal and moral challenges ahead. Understanding the New Crossing Law The new crossing law was introduced to address the growing number of people attempting to enter the country through irregular routes, particularly via dangerous sea crossings and unauthorized land entry. Under the legislation, individuals who knowingly enter the country without permission or assist others in doing so can face criminal charges, fines, or imprisonment. Supporters of the law argue that it closes loopholes in previous immigration frameworks that allowed repeat crossings with limited legal consequences. The government insists the law targets organized smuggling networks and discourages perilous journeys that have resulted in injuries, fatalities, and large-scale rescue operations. However, the wording of the law has raised questions about how broadly it can be applied—and who ultimately bears its consequences. The First Charge: What We Know So Far Authorities confirmed that the first person charged under the new crossing law was detained shortly after entering the country through an unauthorized route. Officials allege the individual knowingly violated immigration rules under the provisions set out in the legislation. Details of the case remain limited, but early reports suggest it will serve as a test case for how courts interpret the law. Legal experts expect the proceedings to set important precedents regarding intent, vulnerability, and the distinction between asylum seekers and deliberate lawbreakers. For the government, the charge demonstrates that the law is operational and enforceable. For critics, it raises concerns about whether the legislation risks criminalizing people fleeing war, persecution, or economic collapse. Political Significance and Government Messaging Politically, the timing of the charge is significant. Immigration remains one of the most divisive issues in modern politics, and the government has faced mounting pressure to show tangible action. Officials have framed the charge as evidence that enforcement mechanisms are finally matching political promises. Statements from senior ministers emphasize deterrence, claiming that visible consequences will discourage future unauthorized crossings and reduce pressure on border infrastructure. The government also maintains that safe and legal routes remain available for those genuinely in need of protection. Yet opposition figures argue that symbolism is driving policy, warning that headline-grabbing charges may do little to address the root causes of irregular migration. Human Rights and Legal Concerns Human rights organizations have reacted with alarm to the first charge. Advocacy groups argue that asylum seekers often have no choice but to use irregular routes due to limited legal entry options. Criminalizing their arrival, they say, risks violating international refugee protections. Legal analysts also point out potential conflicts with existing asylum laws, which protect the right to seek refuge regardless of the method of entry. The case may prompt judicial scrutiny over whether the new crossing law aligns with international obligations. There is also concern about selective enforcement. If the law is applied unevenly, critics fear it could disproportionately affect the most vulnerable while leaving organized criminal networks untouched. Public Reaction: Divided Opinions Public response to the charge has been sharply divided. Some citizens welcome stricter enforcement, arguing that border integrity is essential for national security and public trust in the immigration system. Others express discomfort at seeing individuals criminalized for actions driven by desperation rather than malice. Social media reactions reflect this split, with supporters praising decisive action and critics questioning whether punishment alone can solve a complex global issue. What This Means Going Forward The first charge under the new crossing law is likely just the beginning. If courts uphold the prosecution, authorities may pursue further cases, fundamentally reshaping how irregular migration is handled. Conversely, legal challenges could force revisions or clarifications to the legislation. Much will depend on how judges interpret intent, vulnerability, and proportionality. The case may also influence international perceptions of the country’s commitment to human rights and refugee protection. Conclusion The charging of the first individual under the new crossing law represents a pivotal moment in immigration enforcement. While the government views it as a long-awaited assertion of control, critics warn it may deepen humanitarian and legal tensions. As the case unfolds, it will test not only the strength of the law itself but also the balance between border security and compassion. In an era of global displacement and political polarization, how this law is enforced may shape the country’s immigration landscape—and moral standing—for years to come.
By Fiazahmedbrohi 6 days ago in The Swamp
Comments (1)
Ma Sha Allah.....Ameen