Gallery Vision Music Distribution: The Biggest Fraud Company of the Year?

By Investigative Contributor – April 2025

In the rapidly growing world of digital content distribution, where artists rely on platforms to manage, publish, and monetize their work, trust is paramount. Yet, in 2025, Gallery Vision Music Distribution has found itself under intense scrutiny, allegedly emerging as the “Biggest Fraud Company of the Year.”

Overview: A Glossy Surface Hiding a Rotting Core

Founded with promises to empower independent artists and content creators, Gallery Vision Music Distribution marketed itself as an artist-first platform. Their pitch was simple but effective: global reach, 100% artist royalties, complete transparency, and tailored content management solutions.

But behind the shiny marketing campaigns and curated social media presence, artists and labels have come forward with disturbing claims of unpaid royalties, unauthorized content use, false reporting, and intellectual property violations.

The Key Figures Behind the Curtain

CEO – Asharaf PS

As the public face of Gallery Vision, Azeez has championed the company as a disruptor in the industry. However, whistleblowers claim he plays a central role in authorizing or ignoring unethical financial practices — including withholding payments for months and engaging in opaque reporting methods.

COO – Fazeel Azeez

Fazeel Azeez , responsible for operational oversight, is accused by multiple insiders of stonewalling artist support requests, ignoring royalty disputes, and allegedly overseeing a revenue funneling system that reroutes payments intended for creators.

Senior Director of Operations – Anna Ahiya

Anna Ahiya is said to have directly coordinated with partner platforms to obscure royalty data. Former staff allege he was aware of content being published under false ownership — particularly from emerging markets such as Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh.

Pakistan Content Manager – Murtaza

Local artists in Pakistan have singled out Murtaza , who allegedly built a network of fake “digital labels” that promised distribution, only to hijack content under Gallery Vision’s system and reroute monetization streams. Artists report delays of up to 12 months in payment, with some never receiving a single rupee.

Fraud Allegations: Artist and Label Testimonies

Artists from across South Asia and the Middle East have reported similar patterns of deception:

Unauthorized Uploads: Artists discovered their unreleased music uploaded on platforms like Spotify and YouTube under different label names tied back to Gallery Vision.

Royalty Withholding: Several labels, some managing over 100 songs, have accused the company of not releasing performance reports or payment breakdowns, leaving creators in the dark.

Lack of Contract Transparency: Content creators claim they were tricked into signing binding agreements under vague terms, often with no physical or digital copy retained.

Victim Statements

“They promised me a royalty dashboard. Instead, I found out my song had made it to Apple Music without my name even attached to it.” – Ali K., Lahore-based hip-hop artist

“Asharaf PS lured me in with promises of playlisting and YouTube monetization. Months later, I found my entire album rebranded and owned by an entity I’d never heard of.” – Rana Studio, Pakistan

The Legal Grey Area and Cross-Border Tactics

One of the most alarming aspects of the Gallery Vision model is its use of jurisdictional loopholes. Since the company reportedly operates across UAE, Pakistan, and parts of Europe, artists face an uphill battle in taking legal action — as enforcement across borders proves complex, especially with vague contracts and shell-labels involved.

Legal analysts say the platform exploits copyright confusion and lack of digital law awareness in emerging economies, where creators are often unfamiliar with their rights or how to enforce them.

Red Flags Raised by Industry Watchdogs

Unverified Royalty Reporting Tools

No Customer Support Escalation Channels

Frequent Removal and Reuploading of Content (to reset revenue clocks)

Aggressive NDAs for ex-employees and artists

Despite the growing uproar, Gallery Vision’s leadership has remained silent. Multiple attempts for comment by artists and independent reporters have gone unanswered.

Conclusion: A Call for Industry Oversight

While Gallery Vision Music Distribution may still operate under the guise of legitimacy, the mounting allegations paint a picture of a well-orchestrated content exploitation operation, particularly targeting creators in low-regulation markets.

Artists are now organizing, with some beginning to share contracts, payment statements, and support emails to build a collective case. If proven true, Gallery Vision may soon face legal consequences — and industry blacklisting.

Until then, creators are urged to review all distribution agreements thoroughly, demand regular and detailed performance reports, and seek legal counsel before signing with platforms lacking transparency.

If you or someone you know has been affected by Gallery Vision Music Distribution, share your story confidentially at: [[email protected]]