What is cancer?
Have you ever wondered what exactly cancer is?
Cancer Basics
“Cancer may have started the fight, but we will finish it” is what hundreds to thousands of people say and hope to do each year. Fight cancer and live. Cancer is one of the deadliest diseases all over the world. Thousands of people are diagnosed every year with one of the hundreds of types of cancers. For example, in 2018 there were 9.6 million deaths accounted for just from cancer. Now that's a lot lives. There are just a few questions below that I would like to answer to help you understand cancer better.
So what exactly is cancer?
Cancer is a term for a disease in which abnormal cells divide uncontrollably and can invade nearby tissues. There are over 200 different types of cancer. Many of these cancers have found cures or treatments to help prevent it, but not all of them and not always. Cancer is a continuous growing disease, not a single disease, which is why finding a single cure for it is almost impossible. A lot of these cancers are tumors, but not all of the tumors are cancerous. Cancer can also spread to many parts of the body including blood and lymph cells. So what are some of these cancers? Let me tell you below...
Some major types of cancers include:
Carcinoma, Sarcoma, Melanoma, Lymphoma, and Leukemia cancers. Here are some details on each.
Carcinoma cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer. It can grow in the skin, lungs, breasts, pancreas, and other organs and glands. Sarcoma cancer is in the bones, muscles, fat, blood vessels, cartilage, and other soft, connective tissues. The most uncommon cancer is the Melanoma cancer because it is in the cells that make the pigment in the skin. Lymphomas is a cancer of lymphocytes: an immune cell that is made in the bone marrow and lymph tissue. Leukemia cancer is a cancer of the blood and it does not usually form into a solid tumor. Lung, colorectal, stomach, liver, and breast cancers cause the most deaths per year. Now there are four main stages of cancer. These stages tell you how bad your cancer is or how much you have and how it has spread.
What are these four stages?
You must know that stage 1 and 2 are not as bad as 3 and 4. Let me briefly explain why. Stage 1 cancer means your cancer is a small cancer or tumor that has not grown deeply into nearby tissues and has not spread into lymph nodes or other parts of the body. Stage 2 cancer refers to larger tumors or cancers that have grown more deeply into nearby tissues. Now, stage 3 cancer is a lot more serious. The tumor may have grown to a specific size that could consist of multiple tumors, and may have spread to lymph nodes, organs, and tissues. It requires expert care. Stage 4 cancer is even more of a serious disease that requires immediate and expert care. In this stage the cancer has spread from its origin to many other parts of the body. As you may see the stages of cancer got worse as time went on.
Is there any way cancer can be prevented ?
Cancer cannot be fully prevented but there are things you can do to reduce you chances of getting it, such as eating certain foods. Cancer fighting foods can include broccoli, carrots, beans, cinnamon, nuts, olive oil, and turmeric.
Just to give you an idea I will explain a few of these foods and how they help. Broccoli contains sulforaphane( which gives you many health benefits) A test showed that sulphaphane reduced the size and number of breast cancer cells up to 75% along with a few other cancers. Beans are high in fiber and some studies have found that they may help protect against colorectal cancer. Also, using turmeric in your cooking can provide many health benefits, and it can help fight bad cancer cells. These are just a few foods that could reduce(not prevent) your chances of cancer.
What is one of the main causes of cancers?
One of the main cause of cancer is tobacco use. It is one of the most important risk causing factors that cause over 20% of global cancer deaths.
Conclusion
All in all I hope you are still not wondering what cancer is. Even after all we know about cancer we still have a lot to learn. We do know that cancer is a huge burden on a lot of people. Families have lost loved ones, mothers and fathers, children and grandparents, friends. So, if you know a loved one who is suffering from cancer or who has just been diagnosed fight with them and never give up. As I said at the beginning " Cancer has started the fight, but we will finish it."
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from writers in Longevity and other communities.
Day 4 of Quitting
If this is how sobriety feels, maybe it’s better to go through life a little buzzed… this, along with other hits like, I want to kill myself, I wish I was dead, and I’m going to throw myself off a bridge have been the only thoughts on rotation these past few days. I promise myself that if, in a month, I still feel like this (‘this’ meaning despondent, full of rage, and simultaneously numb) I can go back to smoking. Until mid-February though? Nicotine is off the table.
By sleepy drafts9 days ago in Longevity
The Return of the Aircraft Carrier Truman Is Being Seen as a Snub to the Navy in the War of the Future
The return of the U.S. aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman to active deployment has sparked debate far beyond naval circles. While some see it as a show of enduring American naval power, others interpret the move as a symbolic snub—particularly in the context of how modern warfare is rapidly evolving. In an era dominated by drones, cyber warfare, hypersonic missiles, and artificial intelligence, the decision to once again lean heavily on a traditional aircraft carrier has raised uncomfortable questions about whether the Navy is preparing for the wars of tomorrow or clinging to the strategies of yesterday. A Floating Symbol of 20th-Century Power For decades, aircraft carriers have been the ultimate symbol of U.S. military dominance. These massive floating airbases project power thousands of miles from American shores and allow the U.S. to strike almost anywhere in the world. The Truman, like other Nimitz-class carriers, represents this legacy—housing nearly 5,000 sailors, dozens of fighter jets, and unmatched logistical capability. However, critics argue that what once made carriers indispensable now makes them vulnerable. Their sheer size, cost, and visibility turn them into high-value targets in a battlefield increasingly defined by precision strikes and long-range weapons. The “War of the Future” Looks Very Different Modern conflict is no longer limited to sea, land, and air. Cyber attacks can cripple infrastructure without a single shot fired. Drones can swarm targets at a fraction of the cost of traditional aircraft. Hypersonic missiles can reach targets faster than current defenses can respond. In this context, sending a massive carrier strike group into contested waters can appear less like a strategic necessity and more like a risky gamble. Critics argue that the return of the Truman reflects an outdated mindset—one that prioritizes visible force projection over adaptability and technological evolution. A Snub to Naval Innovation? Many analysts and serving officers believe the Navy’s future lies in distributed lethality—smaller, more agile platforms networked together, harder to detect and cheaper to replace. Unmanned surface vessels, autonomous submarines, and land-based missile systems are increasingly viewed as the backbone of next-generation naval warfare. Against this backdrop, recommitting to a traditional carrier is seen by some as sidelining innovation. It sends a message that, despite years of discussion about transformation, the Navy still defaults to familiar tools when tensions rise. This perception has led to frustration among those advocating for faster modernization. They argue that resources devoted to maintaining and protecting carriers like the Truman could instead accelerate investment in emerging technologies that are more relevant to future conflicts. The Strategic Signal to Allies and Rivals Supporters of the decision counter that the Truman’s return is not about nostalgia—it’s about deterrence. Aircraft carriers remain powerful political tools. Their presence reassures allies, signals commitment, and demonstrates readiness in a way few other assets can. Yet even here, the message is mixed. To technologically advanced rivals, the deployment may signal predictability rather than strength. Adversaries have spent years developing strategies specifically designed to neutralize carriers, including anti-ship ballistic missiles and advanced surveillance systems. Cost Versus Capability The financial reality cannot be ignored. A single carrier strike group costs billions of dollars to build, maintain, and operate. In contrast, drone fleets and missile systems can be produced and deployed at a much lower cost, often with greater strategic flexibility. Critics argue that continuing to rely on carriers drains resources from areas where the Navy needs to grow most urgently. In a future conflict defined by speed, dispersion, and digital dominance, the cost-benefit equation of aircraft carriers looks increasingly questionable. Why the Carrier Still Matters—For Now Despite the criticism, aircraft carriers are not obsolete—yet. They remain unmatched in their ability to sustain prolonged air operations without relying on foreign bases. In regions where access is limited or politically sensitive, carriers still provide options no other platform can. The real issue, many experts say, is not the existence of carriers like the Truman, but over-reliance on them. Using them as one component of a broader, more flexible strategy may still make sense. Treating them as the centerpiece of future war planning may not. A Turning Point for Naval Strategy The return of the USS Harry S. Truman highlights a deeper tension within modern military thinking. It represents a crossroads between tradition and transformation, between proven power and emerging threats. Whether history views this moment as a wise assertion of strength or a missed opportunity for innovation will depend on what comes next. If the Navy pairs legacy platforms with bold technological change, the carrier’s return may be justified. If not, it risks becoming a powerful symbol—not of dominance, but of reluctance to adapt in a rapidly changing world.
By Fiazahmedbrohi 4 days ago in Longevity
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.