The Death of “Live and Let Live”
How tolerance became coercion, and why moral relativism cannot sustain a free society
There was a time when “live and let live” actually meant something noble. It meant respecting each other’s differences, coexisting in peace, and not forcing our personal views onto our neighbors. It meant freedom of conscience, speech, and thought. It meant that the person next to you didn’t have to believe what you believed for both of you to live decent, peaceful lives.
That time is gone.
The same phrases that once promised freedom have been rewritten into tools of control. “Speak your truth” now means, “Say what we approve of or be silenced.” “Tolerance” now means, “Affirm everything, even when it’s false or harmful.” “Colorblind” is now treated as offensive because it fails to divide people deeply enough. The goalposts move faster than most people can keep up, and anyone who tries to stand on principle is told they are the problem.
This is not about party lines. It is about moral ones.
The Shift from Freedom to Fear
You used to be able to say, “Let’s agree to disagree,” and that was enough. Now disagreement itself is treated as hate. Whole careers, friendships, and families are being torn apart not because of cruelty or violence, but because one person dared to express a conviction the other did not like.
I have watched people who were once close friends block each other after twenty years over a political meme. Family members disown one another because one side believes in biological reality while the other insists that feelings redefine truth. I have seen Christian men and women who live quiet, honest lives accused of belonging to “cults that encourage rape” simply because they hold to biblical values.
This is what happens when moral relativism replaces truth. Everyone becomes their own god, their own moral authority, and the moment you refuse to worship their version of reality, you are branded a threat.
Chaos Disguised as Compassion
The tragedy is that all of this comes packaged in the language of compassion. We are told it is unkind to judge, as if judgment itself were evil. But saying “it is wrong to judge” is a judgment. Saying “truth is subjective” is an absolute statement. The contradictions do not matter to the modern mind because feelings have replaced logic, and emotional affirmation has replaced moral consistency.
We have seen the result: lawlessness celebrated as activism, disorder praised as justice, destruction excused as “expression.” You cannot drive through some cities without risking your life because protestors block intersections in the name of “peace.” You cannot park your car without fear of vandalism. And at the same time, police are defunded while crime rises. Common sense is treated as extremism.
Our leaders call this progress. In reality, it is moral regression disguised as enlightenment. You cannot build a free society on moral confusion.
The Consequences Are Everywhere
These ideological shifts do not stop at slogans or politics. They ripple into everything: housing, wages, food, family, and law. The economy is overburdened because we have replaced responsibility with entitlement. Systems designed to help the poor collapse under the weight of those who have learned to exploit them. Crime grows while accountability shrinks. People who work hard and obey the law are penalized while those who break it are rewarded with subsidies and sympathy.
We are told that gender, truth, and morality are all subjective. That men can be women, that theft is “redistribution,” and that objectivity itself is oppression. It is insanity parading as compassion. And anyone who speaks truth is censored “for safety” because the truth hurts feelings. We now protect feelings more than we protect freedom.
Why Relativism Destroys Peace
A society that rejects absolute truth cannot sustain peace. “Live and let live” depended on the shared moral understanding that life itself is sacred, that freedom is rooted in responsibility, and that rights come with boundaries. Once that moral foundation erodes, coexistence becomes impossible. When one side believes in objective good and evil and the other believes morality is whatever you want it to be, there is no middle ground, only the illusion of it.
The Bible says, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil.” We are living in that warning. Up is down, right is wrong, and lies are treated as kindness. People are told to follow their hearts, even when their hearts lead them straight into ruin. And still, those who try to warn them are condemned for being “intolerant.”
This is not peace. It is chaos wrapped in the language of love.
The Way Back
The only way to restore peace is to return to truth. Truth is not hateful. Truth is the foundation of real love. Without it, compassion becomes corruption and tolerance becomes tyranny. The call to “live and let live” was never meant to mean “live without truth.” It meant to live free because truth exists.
We are to be in the world, not of it. We are to love others, but not delight in evil. To live in peace as far as it depends on us, but not to compromise righteousness to preserve comfort. The answer is not more political slogans. It is repentance, humility, and a collective return to moral sanity.
A free nation cannot survive without moral order, and moral order cannot survive without God. “Live and let live” is dead because truth has been buried with it. But resurrection is still possible for individuals, families, and nations if we remember that freedom only lives where truth reigns.
About the Creator
Peter Thwing - Host of the FST Podcast
Peter unites intellect, wisdom, curiosity, and empathy —
Writing at the crossroads of faith, philosophy, and freedom —
Confronting confusion with clarity —
Guiding readers toward courage, conviction, and renewal —
With love, grace, and truth.


Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.