Planned Obsolescence:

After witnessing how a high-priced television broke down without suffering any mistreatment and while being used correctly, and upon being informed by the technical service that the only alternative was to buy a new replacement product since the warranty had just expired, this event led me to reflect on:

Planned obsolescence is a strategy used by manufacturers to intentionally reduce the lifespan of products, thereby encouraging continuous consumption. This phenomenon has been the subject of debate in economic, environmental, and ethical terms, as it affects both consumers and the planet. While it promotes economic growth by generating constant demand for goods, it also brings significant problems, such as the increase in electronic waste and the depletion of natural resources.

Origin and Types of Planned Obsolescence

The concept of planned obsolescence emerged in the 1920s when products began to be designed with a limited lifespan to stimulate the economy. There are different types of planned obsolescence:

Functional Obsolescence: This occurs when a product is no longer compatible with new technologies or operating systems, as seen in the case of mobile phones and computers.

Quality Obsolescence: This happens when manufacturers use low-durability materials to ensure that the product fails after a specific period.

Perceived Obsolescence: This occurs when companies introduce new models with slight design or functionality changes, encouraging consumers to replace still-functional products.

Environmental and Economic Impact

One of the biggest problems of planned obsolescence is its environmental impact. Every year, millions of tons of electronic waste are generated worldwide, contributing to soil and water pollution due to the toxic materials contained in these devices. Additionally, the extraction of natural resources to manufacture new products significantly depletes the environment.

From an economic perspective, planned obsolescence benefits companies by fostering constant consumption. However, for consumers, it represents a recurring expense, as they are forced to replace products more frequently. Furthermore, this practice can contribute to an excessive consumption culture that disregards the importance of sustainability.

Alternatives and Solutions

In response to the negative effects of planned obsolescence, various initiatives and regulations have emerged to combat it. Some of the most notable include:

Right to Repair: Some countries have implemented laws requiring manufacturers to provide spare parts and repair manuals so that consumers can extend the lifespan of their products.

Sustainable Production: Responsible companies are opting for more durable materials and modular designs that allow component upgrades without the need to replace the entire product.

Conscious Consumption: Educating consumers about product durability and repairability is crucial to reducing the impact of planned obsolescence.

The Role of Governments and Society

The role of governments is crucial in regulating this practice. Implementing regulations that require manufacturers to design repairable and recyclable products is one of the most effective strategies to mitigate the problem. Additionally, incentive policies for companies investing in the circular economy can promote a positive change in the industry.

On the other hand, public awareness plays a decisive role. Choosing long-lasting products, prioritizing companies committed to sustainability, and exerting pressure on manufacturers to adopt more responsible practices are actions that can make a difference.

Innovation as a Solution

The development of sustainable technologies can represent a viable solution. Designing products with biodegradable materials, longer-lasting rechargeable batteries, and modular devices that allow upgrades without needing full replacements could revolutionize the industry.

Planned obsolescence is a phenomenon that impacts both the economy and the environment. While it drives market growth, it also contributes to the ecological crisis and an unsustainable consumption culture. Combating this practice requires a joint effort among governments, manufacturers, and consumers to promote responsible production policies and more conscious consumption. Only in this way can we move towards a future where technology and sustainability coexist harmoniously.

I look forward to reading your thoughts on this topic!