Hopelessness Over Repeated Setbacks
When things seem to improve, a new variant like XEC emerges, triggering a cycle of progress followed by setbacks leading to feelings of helplessness and despair.
A Flicker of Hope, Extinguished Again
People sat by the windows, staring out at the dim city streets. It had been two years since the world had first changed, and though life had begun to feel almost normal again, that fragile sense of relief was shattered when news of the XEC variant broke. The headlines, warnings, and rising case numbers had crept back into daily conversations, dragging them down with the weight of it all.
For a while, there was hope. The vaccines had come, restrictions had eased, and they had allowed themselves to believe that maybe—just maybe—they were on the other side of this nightmare. They had even made plans: long-postponed trips with friends, family reunions, return to the jobs they loved but had been forced to leave. They had imagined a life without masks, without distance, without fear.
But now, everything felt like it was slipping away again. The XEC variant was spreading rapidly, undoing the progress they had fought so hard for. Plans were being canceled, restrictions tightened once more. The sense of déjà vu was unbearable. People had thought they had reached their breaking point long ago, but this—this felt different.
They were exhausted. Not the kind of exhaustion that sleep could fix, but a deeper, bone-weary fatigue that came from living in a constant state of uncertainty. Every time it seemed like they were close to the end, another wave hit. Another variant. Another setback. It was like swimming toward the shore, only to be dragged back by the tide again and again.
People remembered the first months of the pandemic—how scared everyone had been, but also how united. There was a sense of shared purposes, of fighting something together. Now, they just felt numb. People were tired, divided, some even indifferent. And they couldn’t be blamed. They felt the same, too tired to care, too frustrated to find the energy to hope again.
Their phones buzzed with another news alert: cases rising, hospitals filling up, yet another reminder that the end wasn’t near. They tossed the phones aside, lumps forming in their throats. It was hard not to feel foolish for ever believing things would get better. They had let themselves feel hope, and now, that hope felt like a cruel joke. The cycle of progress and setbacks had worn them down to the point where they wondered if they had anything left to give.
Friends and families tried to be optimistic. "We’ve come this far; we just have to push through this wave," they’d say. But they couldn’t muster the same faith. they couldn’t imagine another round of lockdowns, another period of isolation, more weeks spent avoiding people they loved. They missed the spontaneity of life, the joy of making plans without the constant dread that they’d be canceled at the last minute.
What hurt the most was the uncertainty. How long would this go on? Would it ever truly end, or would they be stuck in this cycle forever—rising, falling, rising, and falling again? Every time things looked up, the rug was pulled out from under them, and it was becoming harder to get back on their feet. They had started to wonder if there was any point in hoping for normalcy anymore. Maybe this was it. Maybe this was the new reality they would have to live with.
Their hearts ached for the life they had lost, for the people they used to be. Before the pandemic, they had dreams and plans, but now it felt like they were just surviving, stuck in limbo. What was the point in dreaming if every time you tried to move forward, something knocked you back?
As night fell, people curled up on their couches, staring into the darkened rooms. They couldn’t find the energy to turn on the lights, and the silence felt heavy. All they could do was wait—wait for the next wave, the next variant, the next moment of disappointment. They didn’t know when or if this would end, and the not knowing was the hardest part of all.
For now, all they could do was sit with the feeling. The hopelessness was suffocating, but somehow, they had to keep breathing through it. Maybe tomorrow would be better, or maybe it wouldn’t. But for tonight, all they could do was wait for the storm to pass, if it ever would.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Jacktone Otieno and writers in Humans and other communities.
Factors that Make Men Sexually Inactive Over Time
Certainly, a variety of factors can contribute to men becoming sexually inactive over time. These factors can be broadly categorized into physiological, psychological, relational, and lifestyle-related aspects. Understanding these can help in identifying potential causes and seeking appropriate support or treatment if needed.
By Jacktone Otienoabout a year ago in Humans
Los Angeles Billionaire Moves to Nevada After California Threatens to Tax Wealth
When a prominent Los Angeles billionaire quietly packed up and moved to Nevada, it wasn’t just a personal lifestyle change — it was a political statement. The move came shortly after California lawmakers revived proposals to tax extreme wealth, targeting the state’s richest residents as a way to fund public services and address inequality. Now, that single relocation has become a symbol in a much larger debate: Do wealth taxes strengthen states — or drive their most valuable taxpayers away? The Trigger: California’s Wealth Tax Proposal California has long wrestled with how to fund its ambitious social programs while addressing widening income inequality. In recent years, progressive lawmakers have floated proposals to introduce a wealth tax, aimed at individuals with net worths above a certain threshold — often tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Unlike income taxes, which apply to yearly earnings, wealth taxes target accumulated assets such as stocks, real estate, and business holdings. Supporters argue that this approach ensures the ultra-rich contribute a fairer share to public infrastructure, education, and housing. Critics, however, warn that wealth taxes are difficult to enforce and easy to avoid, especially in a mobile economy where residency can shift across state lines. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move appears to validate those concerns. Why Nevada? Nevada has become a magnet for wealthy individuals — and the reasons are straightforward. The state has: No personal income tax No capital gains tax Business-friendly regulations A growing financial and tech services sector For high-net-worth individuals, relocating to Nevada can mean saving millions of dollars annually. For someone facing the possibility of a wealth tax layered on top of California’s already high income taxes, the financial incentive is hard to ignore. In this case, the billionaire reportedly established legal residency in Nevada, purchased property, and shifted business operations — all steps that tax experts say are increasingly common among ultra-wealthy Californians. A Broader Trend, Not an Isolated Case This move is far from unique. Over the past decade, California has seen a steady outflow of wealthy residents to states like Nevada, Texas, Florida, and Arizona. While climate, housing costs, and lifestyle play roles, tax policy has become a central factor. High-profile departures — from tech executives to hedge fund managers — often spark political backlash. Critics argue that the wealthy are abandoning the state that helped them succeed. Defenders counter that states should not penalize success to fund unsustainable spending. The Los Angeles billionaire’s relocation has once again brought this tension into the spotlight. The Political Reaction in California California lawmakers defending the wealth tax proposal insist that fear of capital flight is exaggerated. They argue that the state’s economic advantages — including access to talent, innovation hubs, and cultural influence — outweigh tax concerns for most entrepreneurs. Some lawmakers also point out that California already relies heavily on its highest earners, with a small percentage of taxpayers contributing a large share of total revenue. In their view, asking the ultra-rich to contribute more is not radical — it’s necessary. Opponents, however, see the billionaire’s move as a warning sign. They argue that when even a single wealthy individual leaves, the state can lose not only tax revenue but also investment, philanthropy, and job creation. What This Means for State Finances The departure of one billionaire may not immediately dent California’s massive budget, but the long-term implications are harder to ignore. Wealthy individuals often: Pay a disproportionate share of state taxes Fund startups and venture capital Support universities, museums, and nonprofits If enough high-net-worth residents follow the same path, critics warn, the tax base could shrink faster than lawmakers expect. Supporters of the wealth tax counter that public investment funded by higher taxes could improve quality of life for millions — potentially attracting new residents and businesses in the long run. A National Debate Over Wealth and Mobility This story extends beyond California. Across the U.S., states are competing for residents — especially wealthy ones. Tax policy has become one of the most powerful tools in that competition. While progressive states push for redistribution, low-tax states market themselves as havens for capital. The Los Angeles billionaire’s move underscores a key reality of modern economics: wealth is increasingly mobile. Assets can move digitally, businesses can relocate headquarters, and individuals can change residency with relative ease. This mobility complicates efforts to tax extreme wealth at the state level, fueling calls for federal solutions instead. The Ethical Divide At the heart of the controversy lies a philosophical question: Should wealthy individuals feel a moral obligation to remain and pay higher taxes in the states that enabled their success — or are they justified in seeking the most favorable financial environment? Supporters of wealth taxes argue that extreme inequality threatens social stability and that those who benefit most from the system should help sustain it. Opponents argue that punitive taxation discourages innovation and rewards capital flight, ultimately harming the very communities lawmakers aim to help. The billionaire’s move doesn’t settle the debate — but it sharpens it. What Happens Next? California’s wealth tax proposals are still evolving, and it remains unclear whether a final version will pass. Even if enacted, legal challenges and enforcement hurdles loom large. Meanwhile, states like Nevada are likely to continue benefiting from California’s policy uncertainty, attracting wealthy residents and businesses seeking predictability. For policymakers, the challenge is balancing fairness, revenue needs, and competitiveness in a system where borders are increasingly porous. Final Thoughts The Los Angeles billionaire’s move to Nevada is more than a headline — it’s a case study in how tax policy shapes behavior. It highlights the difficulty of taxing wealth at the state level and the unintended consequences that can follow even well-intentioned reforms. As California debates its economic future, one thing is clear: in a mobile, interconnected economy, policy decisions don’t just redistribute wealth — they redirect it. Whether wealth taxes become a solution or a cautionary tale will depend on how lawmakers respond to the signals already being sent.
By Muhammad Hassana day ago in Humans
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.