Andrew Tate: Guilty or Framed?

I recently had a discussion with my friends about Andrew Tate. During our talk, I realized how much their opinions were shaped by outside influence, just as I mentioned in my previous articles“The Illusion of Free Thinking” and “How Social Media Controls Your Thoughts Without You Realizing It” . This made me want to write this article, to show the importance of logical thinking and how to handle outside influence.

You’ll notice that I sometimes pause to explain or shift between points. That’s because this topic is bigger than just Andrew Tate, and to fully understand it, we need to connect different pieces.

First of all, I’m neither a fan of Andrew Tate nor one of his critics. People often turn celebrities into idols, but I don’t see any of them that way. I admire their achievements and their point of view in some cases, and that’s it. It’s the same with Andrew Tate, I listen to what he has to say, appreciate the things that make sense, and ignore his nonsense. So this will be a purely logical analysis of the situation surrounding Andrew Tate.

It’s been said that he was involved in human trafficking and was sent to prison. As I heard this, I said, okay, I’ve seen some of his interviews and noticed that sometimes he speaks in a unbearable way about women, which, to me, reflects a weak personality in this matter. Tate’s fans might say “What? Andrew Tate? Weak? Have you ever seen him?” But I’ll explain why I see him as weak at the end.

By the way, this is the same argument many people use when they claim he is a human trafficker, his way of speaking about women. I have seen and heard this argument many times, especially on social media.

Someone’s way of speaking alone is not sufficient to make such an assumption.

After hearing what was reported about Andrew Tate, I asked myself: Who accused him of being a human trafficker? Well, the government and news did. And what evidence did they have? Nothing that couldn’t be faked! And they didn’t even fake it properly, they brought witnesses to court who said, "He didn’t do anything to us, and they don’t even know why they are there!"

Of course, some women claimed it was true. But could they have been paid? I’m not saying they were because I don’t know the truth. I’m just asking, what if?

Anyway, it could still be true. Because I say, as long as you don’t know the truth for sure, anything can be possible, no matter how unlikely it may seem. By that, I mean being 100% sure through evidence either provided or seen by yourself.

But that’s almost impossible, right? Since we will never be able to know the absolute truth about many things, it is wrong, at least in my opinion, to form a judgment or decision. One shouldn’t accept anything without true, reliable evidence. Until then, everything should be seen as merely an assumption.

Most people do this without even realizing it.As I mentioned, it is not wise to believe something without reliable evidence. But in most cases, that evidence is either inaccessible or takes years to uncover. Sounds frustrating? Yes, but that’s just reality and should be accepted. The human brain strongly dislikes the state of not knowing. To reduce uncertainty, it tries to fit new information into familiar patterns, even if the information is incomplete or incorrect. This makes the brain more suggestible and increases the likelihood of accepting repeated claims as truth, even without strong evidence.

Look, I’m going to tell you something that might blow your mind, I’m not even sure that the Earth is round! Why? Because I haven’t seen it myself. It hasn’t been proven to me. Almost everything suggests that it’s true, but since I haven’t personally verified it, I can’t say for certain. And, I don’t have the time to study the science behind it to prove it for myself. So, I don’t believe it, I just hold it as the most likely assumption and that keeps me open to other assumptions.

You might say, “But scientists, history, the Bible, or the Quran all say it’s round!”

And that’s exactly what I wrote about in my last article, The Illusion of Free Thinking. Just for a moment, forget who told you the Earth is round and ask yourself, what if they’re wrong?

So back to AT, I thought, well, I don’t know Andrew Tate, and he sometimes talks nonsense about women. Now, they’ve charged him with human trafficking, and you I absolutely no idea what’s true.

So, let’s think logically before assuming anything. What was the source of this information? The news! The most unreliable source on the planet! Why? Because outside of family, even if someone or an organization tells the truth 99% of the time, you still have to be very careful before believing them or making a decision.

With the news, it’s not even 50%! So believing it without question is foolish.

So now, I’m left with the human trafficking charge against Andrew Tate.

He made himself one of the biggest enemies of the government and big tech companies by aggressively speaking out against corruption, exposing how the U.S. government takes advantage of people, and criticizing the war in Palestine. He also encourages people, especially the youth, to be strong, though in his own harsh and unpleasant way. And guess what? Strong people are every government's worst nightmare. The stronger people become, the less control the government has. Strong people don’t stay silent and obey, they don't easily believe, they question, they resist!

So, someone as rich, aware of the system, and smart as Andrew Tate knew that by making such enemies, they would look for a way to bring him down.

Does it make sense, then, that he would involve himself in human trafficking? Something that happens right under the government’s nose, or should I say, with their support, permission, supervision, or at the very least, their knowledge?

What? Are you saying the government supports human trafficking?

Logically, there are powerful hands behind it within governments. Think about it, the U.S. government is capable of hacking and stealing highly classified top-secret information from Russia, North Korea, or Iran, countries on the other side of the world with that level of security—but they can’t track down human traffickers operating right under their noses?That just doesn’t make sense to me.

So, would Andrew Tate, someone who knows that this shameful, honorless business is closely watched by the government, really choose to get involved in human trafficking?

It’s hard to even consider that as a possible assumption.

Bottom line: I don’t think he is a human trafficker. Could he still be? Sure. But the most reasonable conclusion is that he is not, I woud say.

But I have to say, I admire Andrew Tate’s courage.

Because everything he knows about politics or Matrix, Elon Musk knows too. So do Tony Robbins, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, and many other celebrities and politicians and I don’t even want to talk about people like Obama. But none of them have the courage to constantly speak out until the problem is solved. They know what could happen to them, so they stay silent.

I find Andrew Tate weak when it comes to relationships and sexuality because he lets his instincts and sexual desires overpower his logic and moral compass.

To me, that’s weakness. Why? Because of The Golden Rule, which is writen in 11 words:

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

If you wouldn’t want something done to you, then you already understand that it is wrong and that others wouldn’t want it either. Ignoring this awareness means you lack self-control. And if you can’t control yourself, that is a sign of weakness, not strength.

1. You wouldn’t want something done to you → You already understand that it is wrong.
2. You still do it despite knowing it’s wrong → This indicates a lack of self-control.
3. Lack of self-control → Shows weakness

Andrew Tate knows and understands this, yet he still can’t resist the feelings that push him to ignore it.

I don’t want to go too deep into the relationship between logic, morality, and sexuality in this article, as it would make it too long. However, I’ll give you a brief explanation to consider:

In my opinion, strength means not letting emotions, feelings, or instincts control our thinking or at least minimizing their influence. The only exception is when they support the values and feelings we truly cherish. If I get angry and notice it affecting my logical thinking, I will reject or suppress any thoughts until I calm down. But if I see someone in need and it triggers empathy in me, I will allow that feeling to influence my thinking, to a certain extent, because it aligns with my values, and that’s something I admire.