Marvel Zombie
Review
The last entry into our 2025 superhero projects catalogue is Marvel Zombies. This was a show that was anticipated by absolutely no one and it disappeared from the public consciousness as quickly as it was released. There was nothing special about the project that made it a must see, or a must remember. In fact if anything it's a must forget.
Okay so we’ve got Kate, Riri, Kamala. This is the funniest possible trio. That said, I feel like they could have done a better job of showing that Kate and Riri are like 5 years older than Kamala. Ms. Marvel is a child, she’s like 15 the other girls are whole ass adults. They all have the vibes of being sisterly with each other but nothing specific sets her apart as the younger one. And that is kind of an important dynamic to highlight.
Blade feels like a rather random addition but I do greatly appreciate the inclusion of heroes outside of the MCU. What If seemed to forget they had access to hundreds of characters.
Excellent use of the entire supporting cast of Black Widow. Absolutely fantastic. I love when Alexi is in stuff, he is the single funniest Marvel character and everyone else can fight me. And I get a whole team of widows? Spoil me more!
Also my wife being the queen of the dead is my favorite thing in the entire world. Yes she can control the entirety of the zombie population, as she should.
Soooo I’m rooting for the Zombies because they are controlled by Wanda and I am not sorry about it. Nalena thinking her little science trick could really counteract Wanda’s magic was cute, stupid, but cute.
Hey Marvel, don’t ever make me listen to Akwafina’s voice ever again. Stop casting her in stuff and make her go away. And we’re letting her wield some of the 10 rings? EW. Seriously stop right now, whoever made that decision should jump off a cliff. Never have ideas again because you are terrible.
What in the Mad Max is going on over here?
John Walker being Zemo’s assistant is quite possibly the funniest thing I’ve ever seen in my life. That doesn’t outweigh the dumbass decision of letting Katie be in this at all, in fact that one decision does in fact kill the whole show. The whole thing is trash and including Akwafina as Katie and letting her have any control over a magical item is in fact why. I sincerely, from the bottom of my heart hope these chucklefucks never make anything ever again. Not just for Marvel, anything, EVER. How stupid do you have to be to think that was a good decision? Astonishing really.
The problem with this show seems to be the inconsistency. There are some really good, funny moments and some excellent emotional motivation and it's immediately followed but just the dumbest things ever and the wild swings really just sink the overall quality.
Why is Mysterio here? No like seriously I need to know why he’s here and why I have to listen to Jake Gyllenhal’s voice. I fear we’ve lost the plot. Kevin Feige I need a word, I am not sure you know anything anymore. I am super convinced you can only name like 10 Marvel characters, you’re killing me. Also could not afford Tom Holland? Cause Mysterio being the one to narrate this scene also makes no sense. Is Marvel okay? That was supposed to be Spidey narrating??? You didn’t even try.
This also seems to be running into the same problem I had with What If in that these writers clearly didn’t get the memo that they have access to 100s of characters.
God this so badly written. The Marvel brand of humor needs to die. Every scene in fact does not need a joke.
My wife is the only saving grace of this stupid, stupid show.
The animation style also makes everyone look the same. So that’s terrible. Literally everyone has the same or deeply similar features and it's lazy and horrible to look at. That looks nothing like Thor, Kamala doesn’t look like Iman at all, and don’t get me started on Wanda.
God the animation is terrible, Scott Lang is in a Mysterio/Dr.Strange hybrid costume WHY. Did you guys actually plan anything? Or were the animators just going off a drunk writers room brainstorming session because this is ridiculous.
The problem with making Wanda the big bad is that it's not gonna make any sense when she’s inevitably defeated. Marvel runs off of a good always wins formula, which means Wanda is gonna die…except she is 1000X stronger then everyone left combined so how exactly do you plan on accomplishing that in a way that isn’t gonna piss me off?
Hulk? Hulk vs Wanda? Okay so I don’t know how to break this to you but there is no version of Hulk that is anywhere capable of defeating any version of Wanda. It’s simply not possible.
Pretty sure the budget for this project was $10 cause we clearly picked writers whose only accomplishment was graduating middle school, the animation is cheap and straight up terrible, and we have Spiderman without Tom Holland but I have to keep hearing Akwafina’s dumbass voice for some reason.
The better ending to this would have actually been Wanda winning and then ruling over her zombie world. That literally makes more sense then whatever is currently happening. Also I love Kamala as much as the next person but she’s basically a human baby compared to Wanda. She’s got nothing.
Also the fact that the animation was not reflecting even a little bit of what the voice acting was doing was truly awful. -10/10 if I could give it less points I would. I truly can not overstate how terrible this project was. Please stop.
About the Creator
Alexandrea Callaghan
Certified nerd, super geek and very proud fangirl.
Keep reading
More stories from Alexandrea Callaghan and writers in Geeks and other communities.
I Know What You Did Last Summer
We were given many creative, incredible, original films this year and we were also given some remakes. Among those was I Know What You Did Last Summer, arguably one of the most iconic horror/thriller films of all time. The original had an incredible cast and a 90s charm to it that is hard to match. We will however be reviewing just this movie as it stands, on its own. We will be comparing how it holds up next to the original in a later article.
By Alexandrea Callaghan29 days ago in Geeks
We Can’t Innovate Our Way Out of the Climate Crisis: Facing the Truth of the Climate Emergency
As the climate crisis intensifies, discussions around its solutions often revolve around technological innovation and the promise of futuristic inventions. From carbon capture technology to electric vehicles and geoengineering, the narrative has become dominated by the belief that if we develop enough innovations, we will be able to reverse or mitigate the worst effects of climate change. However, this perspective, while not without merit, fundamentally overlooks the urgent need for systemic change, behavioral shifts, and most importantly, the reduction of carbon emissions at an immediate and drastic scale. In other words, we can’t innovate our way out of the climate crisis. The Illusion of Technological Salvation Over the past decades, we have seen a technological revolution in multiple sectors — from solar power and wind energy to electric cars and high-efficiency batteries. These innovations have shown significant promise in reducing emissions and making energy use more sustainable. However, despite these advances, we are still experiencing an unprecedented rise in global temperatures, extreme weather events, and biodiversity loss. Technological solutions such as carbon capture, biofuels, and geoengineering have been proposed as “fixes” for climate change, but they are often viewed as silver bullets — too little, too late. While they may be important in reducing carbon emissions in certain sectors, they do not tackle the root cause: the ongoing and unchecked burning of fossil fuels. Carbon capture, for example, is still in its early stages and has not been deployed at the scale necessary to address the crisis. It is also expensive, and its feasibility is questioned by many experts. Similarly, biofuels made from agricultural crops require land, water, and energy inputs that might create more environmental problems than they solve. These technologies have their place in the broader context of climate action, but they cannot and should not be seen as the only solutions. The Need for Radical Systemic Change The truth is that, while technological advancements are necessary, they are not enough. The climate crisis demands systemic changes that go beyond “green” technology. It requires rethinking how we produce, consume, and live. For example, the way our economic system is structured — one that prioritizes profit over people and the planet — needs to be fundamentally challenged. Our fossil-fuel-dependent growth model is simply not sustainable. We need to focus on reducing consumption, particularly in wealthy countries where overconsumption is a significant driver of global emissions. In developed nations, people use far more resources per capita than those in developing countries, and this disparity contributes to the unsustainable nature of global economic systems. By addressing the issues of overconsumption and waste, we would directly curb the demand for fossil fuels. At the same time, climate justice must be at the forefront of the conversation. Vulnerable communities in the Global South, who have contributed the least to the crisis, are bearing the brunt of its effects. The transition to a green economy must prioritize those who are most affected and ensure equitable access to resources. A Cultural Shift Is Necessary What is also crucial is a cultural shift. Climate change is not only an environmental issue but a cultural and societal one. If we keep reinforcing the notion that technological solutions will save us, we risk missing the larger and more important conversation: the need to change our behaviors. Consumption habits, transportation patterns, and food choices — everything we do must be reconsidered if we are to meaningfully reduce our carbon footprint. This is not to say we shouldn’t innovate; rather, it’s about recognizing that innovation must be a part of a holistic approach. Technological breakthroughs are important, but they must be coupled with policy changes, behavioral shifts, and stronger accountability mechanisms. For example, the expansion of public transportation or the promotion of plant-based diets could reduce the need for carbon-intensive activities, which is just as critical as advancing electric vehicles. The Role of Governments and Policy Change Perhaps the most important piece of the puzzle is policy change. Governments around the world need to enact bold, binding climate policies that curb emissions, promote sustainability, and prioritize environmental health. This includes imposing carbon taxes, eliminating subsidies for fossil fuels, and investing in green infrastructure. However, it also requires regulating industries that contribute significantly to emissions, such as the agricultural sector, which is responsible for a large proportion of global methane emissions, or the fashion industry, one of the largest polluting sectors worldwide. Moreover, governments need to foster international cooperation. The climate crisis is not limited by national borders, and while some countries are already taking steps toward sustainable practices, many are still lagging behind. Global solidarity and binding international agreements such as the Paris Agreement are essential for pushing all nations, especially high-emission ones, to take immediate action. Conclusion: The Time to Act is Now We are living in an age of climate emergencies — heatwaves, wildfires, flooding, and droughts are no longer anomalies but recurring events. The technology to mitigate climate change is important, but it cannot be seen as the only answer. Without deep structural reforms, shifts in consumption patterns, and radical policy action, no amount of innovation will be enough to save the planet. Ultimately, the world cannot afford to wait for a technological fix. We need to act now, embracing a multifaceted approach to tackle the climate crisis head-on. If we truly want a sustainable future, we must recognize that changing our behaviors, systems, and policies is just as essential as new technologies. The time for action is now — and it requires all of us.
By Fiazahmedbrohi 7 days ago in Geeks
The steps to losing a child
Step One: Lose a child. Not what anyone wants to happen and nothing you can do to change it, but you can go through steps to becoming happy again. You can go through steps to loving again. You can go through steps to become a new you because after losing a child you will never be the same person you once were.
By Tabitha Hinkley2 days ago in Fiction
Comments (2)
Nice
And I wasn't a big fan of the comics, either.