Five Changes I Would Make to the Current WWE
Because WWE is so Dead, it's considered Haunted at this point.
Five changes I would make to the current WWE. The first thing would be to call the Women participants “Divas” again. It is not the name that hurts women’s wrestling. It had always been the dumbass and trashy storylines involving women that ruined Women’s Wrestling. Ever since Bayley, Sasha, Charlotte, and Becky Lynch legitimized the division again, the Women’s Division has been the strongest it’s been. Now, don’t misunderstand me, there have been standouts in the WWE’s Women’s Division, but today it’s more about competition and belts than
smutty storylines. That’s as it should be.
I have not been turned on by slutty whores in movies, television, or professional wrestling. For people like me, I’m turned on by capable women, like a final girl in a slasher film, for instance. They are cuter than their hoe friends, but they are smart and capable. They are not flaunting things for the world to see. I know most men pick their favorite divas based on attractiveness; I do also. In my mind, there is my girl. Why violate that support by having them make out with a geriatric rapist piece of poop or another wrestler?
The second thing I would do is to give the women their own show. I want them to bring back Sunday Heat for an hour at 7:00 pm on Sunday evening. If you want to put it on Netflix, go ahead. You want us to care about the Women’s Division again? Focus on them. Heat was only an hour back in the day, and so was ECW on Friday nights. There were three 20-minute matches. Spotlight six women or throw in a tag team match if you wish, or eight have Divas for that show. This would force WWE to choose who it wants to promote. The SmackDown and Raw women’s championships could still be defended, but only on their special shows.
The third thing I would do is to stop having these celebrities wrestle or having them in the crowd. Nobody gives a shit about Jelly Roll or Travis Scott. If you’re going to have nonathletes compete in WWE, do what Lawler did to Andy Kaufman. Drop him on his neck and then come out on Letterman and tell everybody, “I was playing the bad guy wrestler.” Lawler then proceeded to tell Andy, “I don’t play wrestler, I am one. This is how I feed my family, and I don’t appreciate a comedian coming out here and making a joke out of it.” WWE must treat its wrestlers as the best at what they do. You don’t job Cody Rhodes out to an actor on Mania.
The fourth thing I would do is to make a Top Contenders List for the Championships. This would force a belt to have a focus and purpose without that nonsense, random jobbing someone out before magically winning a title shot that they never earned in the first place.
The fifth and final thing I would do is fix the atrocious commentary. NXT would feature Mauro Ranallo by himself. Raw would feature Joe Tessitore, and Smackdown would still feature Jim Ross. Grab him from AEW; they never should have let him go. I would never allow commentary for dummies. “I’m Yeeting.” Booker T would not be nutting himself just because Stephanie Vaquer was doing the head-bashing thing. We’re going to promote our wrestling product and fighters as top-tier wrestlers and personalities. We don’t want to portray them as goofs who Yeet with celebrities. NOTICE: I did not touch storylines. Guys, I had to fix the presentation of this hot garbage before I could touch storylines and characters.
About the Creator
DJ Robbins
He wrote a short film that is currently up on Youtube called ,''All the Lonely Boys'' He is an avid Ohio State and Cleveland Browns fan
buymeacoffee.com/djwrites
https://buy.stripe.com/8x27sE1CDd29bqffYMdMI00
Keep reading
More stories from DJ Robbins and writers in Geeks and other communities.
How to Write a Horror Script
Hello dear reader. What scares an audience? A filmmaker could concentrate on phobias centralized to certain groups of people. That would be one route to go. A much more Advantageous route to go would be the purely and simply sake of universal fears i.e. death, loss of loved one. Every story ever told can be broken down into a beginning a middle and an end. In a horror story think of it in these terms opening tragedy evil attacks and is it over.
By DJ Robbins9 months ago in Geeks
Marvel Zombie
The last entry into our 2025 superhero projects catalogue is Marvel Zombies. This was a show that was anticipated by absolutely no one and it disappeared from the public consciousness as quickly as it was released. There was nothing special about the project that made it a must see, or a must remember. In fact if anything it's a must forget.
By Alexandrea Callaghan16 days ago in Geeks
One Battle After Another
Every awards season has a film that quietly reshapes the conversation. In 2026, One Battle After Another has emerged as that defining work — not through spectacle, but through restraint, emotional depth, and fearless storytelling. Directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, the film has become one of the most discussed titles across the Golden Globe nominations 2026, placing it at the heart of a crowded yet compelling race. Unlike typical prestige dramas, One Battle After Another unfolds with an intimacy that feels almost literary. Its power lies not in plot twists but in its examination of endurance — how individuals continue forward when the weight of life refuses to lift. A Film About Persistence, Not Victory At its core, One Battle After Another explores the quiet wars people fight within themselves. The film centers on fractured relationships, moral fatigue, and the lingering consequences of unresolved trauma. Anderson avoids dramatic shortcuts, opting instead for long silences, layered performances, and moments that linger long after the screen fades to black. Critics have drawn comparisons to films like Hamnet, which similarly found emotional resonance through subtlety rather than scale. Like Hamnet, this film trusts its audience — a rare choice in an era of over-explanation. Golden Globes Momentum Builds The film’s momentum became undeniable once the Golden Globe nominations were announced. As conversations around the Golden Globes 2026 nominations intensified, One Battle After Another consistently appeared across prediction lists for Best Motion Picture (Drama), Best Director, and multiple acting categories. Its presence among the projected Golden Globe winners 2026 reflects a broader shift within the awards landscape — one that increasingly rewards emotional authenticity over commercial size. While blockbuster contenders remain part of the discussion, films like this are shaping what the Golden Globes 2026 awards represent artistically. Notably, early reactions suggest the film could follow a trajectory similar to previous Golden Globe winners 2025, which favored character-driven storytelling over spectacle. Jessie Buckley’s Standout Performance A major reason for the film’s acclaim is the performance at its center. Jessie Buckley delivers one of the most restrained and devastating performances of her career. Awards analysts have already included her in Jessie Buckley Golden Globes conversations, noting her ability to convey emotional collapse without overt dramatics. Buckley’s work here feels lived-in rather than performed. It’s the kind of role that grows more powerful with reflection — the sort of performance that often resurfaces during late-stage awards voting. Paul Thomas Anderson’s Creative Evolution For longtime admirers of Paul Thomas Anderson, One Battle After Another feels both familiar and evolved. The director’s signature patience remains intact, but the storytelling is leaner, more focused. Gone are the sweeping ensemble narratives; in their place is a quiet confrontation with human fragility. This shift has placed Anderson back into awards contention, with many expecting his name to be called during the Golden Globes 2026 winners announcements — and potentially again during Oscar nominations 2026. Standing Out in a Crowded Awards Field This year’s awards season is unusually competitive. Films like Sinners and Adolescence have dominated headlines, while high-profile releases backed by major studios and streaming platforms continue to command attention. Yet One Battle After Another has carved out its own space, relying on word-of-mouth rather than marketing spectacle. Its success also reflects changing viewing habits. As platforms like Paramount Plus invest in prestige cinema, audiences now encounter award-worthy films beyond traditional theatrical releases. This accessibility has fueled discussions about where to watch Golden Globes contenders and how streaming reshapes awards relevance. Red Carpet Buzz and Cultural Impact While the film itself is understated, its presence at the Golden Globes red carpet is expected to generate attention. Anderson’s rare public appearances and Buckley’s rising profile ensure the film will remain part of the cultural conversation throughout awards night. Whether viewers are tuning in via cable or searching for Golden Globes live streaming options, One Battle After Another represents the type of film that encourages audiences to stay engaged beyond the headlines. Looking Ahead to Awards Night As the countdown continues toward the Golden Globes 2026 awards, the question isn’t whether One Battle After Another will win big — it’s how deeply it will resonate over time. Some films dominate a single season. Others quietly endure. If history is any indication, the films remembered years later aren’t always the loudest. They’re the ones that understood something essential about being human. In that sense, One Battle After Another has already won its most important battle.
By Saboor Brohi about 7 hours ago in Geeks
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.