Everyone Is a Suspect

I’ve always been drawn to stories where the danger isn’t lurking in the shadows—but sitting right next to you. Small towns. Isolated groups. Smiling faces with secrets tucked just beneath the surface. Give me a setting where no one can leave, and I’m already locked in.

My love for horror and murder mysteries isn’t just about the kills or the reveals. It’s about the slow tightening of the circle. The paranoia. The way suspicion spreads once the first body drops. Somewhere along the way, I realized this obsession wasn’t just shaping what I watched—it was shaping what I wanted to write.

That’s why three very different shows—Murder in Small Town X, Whodunnit?, and Harper’s Island—all live in the same corner of my brain. Two were reality shows. One was scripted. But structurally, they were speaking the same language.

⸻

The Shared DNA of These Stories

On paper, these shows shouldn’t belong together. Different formats. Different networks. Different eras of television. And yet they all follow the same unspoken rules.

They trap a group of people in a limited environment. They rely on ensemble casts instead of a single hero. Characters are eliminated through death rather than votes. And most importantly, they invite the audience to play detective. The tension doesn’t come from if someone will die, but who—and why.

These stories don’t just ask who did it?

They ask who are these people when trust collapses?

⸻

Murder in Small Town X: Reality as Survival Horror

Murder in Small Town X was the first show to truly blend reality television with a murder-mystery motive, and because of that, it felt unsettlingly real. The people weren’t actors. The reactions weren’t scripted. Every suspicion, every fracture of trust, felt earned.

It didn’t feel like a game show or competition. It felt more like a reality survival horror experiment. Watching it, I wasn’t invested in who would “win”—I was watching to see who would crack first. The town itself became a pressure cooker, slowly reshaping how people behaved once they realized danger was baked into the environment.

There’s also something quietly tragic about the show’s legacy. It only lasted one season, and the fact that its winner later died in the 9/11 attacks casts an unavoidable shadow over it. Whether that played a role in the series never returning is impossible to know, but it gives the show a strange finality—like it was never meant to be repeated.

⸻

Whodunnit?: Murder as a Group Puzzle

Years later, when Whodunnit? appeared, I was surprised—and excited—to see this genre resurface at all. What made it work was that it didn’t try to recreate Small Town X. Instead, it reworked the formula.

Where Small Town X emphasized individual exploration and found-footage–style discovery, Whodunnit made investigation communal. Clues were uncovered together. Theories were debated as a group. And when someone was eliminated, it often felt random—cruel, even—because the victim’s point of view wasn’t always foregrounded.

That unpredictability kept the mystery alive. You weren’t tracking a single doomed character. Anyone could be next.

⸻

Harper’s Island: Structure as Suspense

Before Whodunnit? ever aired, Harper’s Island quietly laid the blueprint. More than Small Town X, it felt like the true conceptual predecessor.

Harper’s Island played like an Agatha Christie novel adapted into short-form television—something rarely attempted and, honestly, never replicated. A fixed ensemble. A closed setting. A rising body count. With each episode, safety vanished. Narrative importance offered no protection.

I’ve watched the series three times, and it still managed to get me. By the second viewing, I had actually forgotten who the killer was—not because the mystery was unclear, but because the journey was so absorbing that the destination stopped mattering.

That’s the mark of a successful mystery: when the experience outweighs the reveal.

⸻

Why Confinement Matters to Me as a Writer

What makes Harper’s Island feel closer to Whodunnit? than to Murder in Small Town X is confinement. An island. An estate. A single shared space. No escape. No outside life to retreat into.

Murder in Small Town X takes place across a town—still isolated, but looser. As a writer, that distinction matters. When geography is limited, psychology deepens. Characters reveal themselves faster. Who listens at doors. Who lies easily. Who panics when the walls start closing in.

Limiting space forces honesty—or exposes the lack of it. That’s where character lives.

⸻

Full Circle

Ultimately, I’d love to see another reality series built around mystery—something that blends reality television with a puzzle-box or flash-game structure. Even better if it were adapted from an original novel or author’s work. That feels like the natural next step for this genre.

The reason I keep returning to these three shows isn’t nostalgia—it’s genre. This specific blend of confinement, suspicion, and consequence feeds both sides of my brain. It helps me understand what I love to watch and why I love to write what I write. Watching informs writing. Writing deepens watching. It’s all connected.

And while television seems hesitant to revisit this format, at least films like Knives Out and the Agatha Christie adaptations directed by Kenneth Branagh remind us the appetite is still there.

Because when everyone is trapped, the mystery stops being about the killer.

It