Comments on the claims of “7 ways Cypress is different”. All False, Wrong or Lie. Part 1: Developer-Focused is Wrong for E2E Testing
E2E Testing tool should be Tester-Focused, not Developer-Focused
This article was originally published on my Medium Blog on 2023-07-08.
On Cypress's website, it claims (still there, as of 2023–07–03).
Most Cypress testers should have known this: more and more people switched (or are about to) to Playwright. When I say something (as a former research scientist and a testing engineer), I will quote results to support my statement. Below are Google results for “cypress playwright migrate” or “playwright cypress migrate”.
See the movement! There is one Reddit post from the Google results with the title “Cypress.io is about to die, you should migrate your projects”.
“But Cypress is most likely going to close down soon. …
They were already having trouble converting free users to paid users, but then Playwright came along and literally destroyed them.…
A lot of folks hated Cypress because it was limited, you had to pay up in order to properly integrate it into your pipeline. …
The propaganda Cypress did to promote their tool is literally taken out of the Soviet Propaganda manuals.” — source
“Cypress is literally dead. Playwright came and took their lunch.” — another Reddit post said in a funny way.
Here I want to point one thing out, most comments above are referring to Cypress as the company and its behaviour, and only one is about the technical aspect of the tool. Here I am not speculating the future of Cypress.io (a downsizing announcement in Jan 2023 is real though, used the phrase ‘incredibly difficult, but necessary’ for the decision), only see Cypress as a technical failure as a test automation framework/tool.
Let me quote the conclusion of another article, which I read in my Medium feed last week.
“Conclusion
Migrating from Cypress to Playwright can significantly improve your end-to-end testing experience, offering better developer experience, faster test execution, and improved test stability” — from Luc Gagan’s article “Migrating from Cypress to Playwright”
So, the so-called “most developer-loved” is FALSE, i.e. failed assertion, at least lost to Playwright in the JS community alone. In this article, I will talk about Cypress’s “Soviet propaganda” that the Reddit post refers to.
The Developer-Focused End-to-End Testing is Wrong, Obviously
There is a fundamental error in the mindset behind that statement: End-To-End Testing is not about the developers, instead, its audience is the whole team.
Since college, I was taught “end-to-end functional testing is a black-box testing, shall be done independently from developers”, and pretty much what I witnessed in my career. (I know some will say something about new Shift-Left testing, read on). In some Waterfall teams, testers are not allowed to talk to developers and conduct testing strictly based on the specification.
Some will say “We do Agile”. I know Agile well.
According to Kent Beck, Father of Agile, a real Agile team must have the technical capability to do daily production releases. I have been doing that for some client projects since 2008 and my own apps since 2012. Some long-time readers have read and seen test reports (running a big number of Selenium WebDriver tests as regression testing on a daily basis). This is not a show-off but rather to talk about real test automation from a successful Agile perspective.
Developer-loved test automation tools are often a bad choice. For example, during 1997–2015, Java was the dominant coding language. Many developers, including me (for a short while), wanted to use it for testing too. Thankfully, I met one world-renown top Java programmer, who pointed out an obvious thing, “test script should be in a scripting language”. I discovered Ruby, Wow! I think some Microsoft C# developers probably loved Microsoft Coded UI (using the same language and visual studio IDE), but it was deprecated in 2018.
Some would argue, “JavaScript is a scripting language”. Not long ago, Angular.js was the most popular web development framework, and its associated testing tool Protractor became hugely popular. Angular developers sure would love Protractor, as it has built-in support with Angular model in the test syntax, Can’t beat that! The result: Protractor was deprecated.
Software Testers’ job is to find developers’ defects. “Developer-Loved” and “End-to-End Testing”, when these two terms are used together, sounds not completely impossible, but does not feel right, does it?
--
In Part 2, I will comment on Cypress's seven claims one by one.
About the Creator
Zhimin Zhan
Test automation & CT coach, author, speaker and award-winning software developer.
A top writer on Test Automation, with 150+ articles featured in leading software testing newsletters.
Keep reading
More stories from Zhimin Zhan and writers in Geeks and other communities.
The Rachels - 2025
Much to my surprise, I have kept a list of the films I‘ve seen this year. I daresay it isn’t complete. There will be films that snuck in on a late night in front of the TV that I would’ve forgotten to note. Or others, that I went to watch at the cinema, but then had a red wine and promptly forgotten about. But it’s not a bad approximation of the films I’ve seen this year. In total, there are 53 films listed, so an average of one a week and one for good luck.
By Rachel Robbins18 days ago in Geeks
Kapil Sharma Admits Facing Pressure from Netflix on The Great Indian Kapil Show: ‘Hisaab Dena Hota Hai’
Comedy icon Kapil Sharma, widely regarded as one of India’s most popular entertainers, recently opened up about the immense pressure he experienced while working on his Netflix venture, The Great Indian Kapil Show. Known for his quick wit, impeccable timing, and charismatic screen presence, Kapil has been entertaining audiences for over a decade. Yet behind the laughter and fanfare, the comedian reveals there was significant scrutiny and accountability involved when collaborating with a global streaming giant. In an exclusive statement, Kapil confessed, “‘Hisaab dena hota hai’ – there’s a lot of accountability involved when you work with platforms like Netflix. You can’t just do things the way you want; every decision, every joke, every segment has to be justified.” This candid admission sheds light on the challenges entertainers face when transitioning from traditional television to digital streaming platforms, which have different expectations, production standards, and creative oversight. From Television Sensation to Streaming Star Kapil Sharma’s rise to fame began with his television shows, particularly The Kapil Sharma Show, which became a household name for its blend of celebrity interviews, sketches, and audience interaction. The show’s immense popularity cemented Kapil’s reputation as a versatile entertainer capable of appealing to audiences across age groups. The leap from television to a global streaming platform like Netflix, however, brought new challenges. Unlike television, which allows for broader content latitude, streaming services demand higher production quality, tighter scripting, and meticulous attention to audience metrics. Every segment is analyzed not just for humor but also for engagement, viewership patterns, and international appeal. For someone like Kapil, accustomed to the creative flexibility of television, this level of scrutiny was a new experience. Pressure Beyond the Spotlight Kapil’s comment, “‘Hisaab dena hota hai,’” reflects more than just professional oversight. It highlights the psychological and creative pressures entertainers face when working under the global lens of digital platforms. Unlike Indian television networks, Netflix operates with a global audience and has a reputation for data-driven decision-making. This means that even an established star like Kapil must consider every joke, every celebrity interaction, and every storyline from multiple perspectives – including cultural sensitivities, global relevance, and streaming analytics. Industry insiders suggest that such accountability can be both motivating and stressful. While it pushes creators to raise their standards and innovate, it can also constrain spontaneity, especially for comedians whose charm lies in improvisation and quick thinking. Kapil Sharma’s experience underscores the delicate balance between maintaining creative freedom and adhering to platform expectations. Fan Reactions and Public Perception Fans of Kapil Sharma have expressed empathy for the comedian’s revelation. Social media platforms are filled with messages supporting him, praising his honesty, and acknowledging the difficulties of navigating global platforms. Many fans noted that while The Great Indian Kapil Show retained Kapil’s trademark humor, the behind-the-scenes pressures were invisible to audiences who often only see the final polished product. Critics have also commented that the transition from TV to streaming requires not just talent but adaptability. Kapil Sharma’s openness about these pressures may encourage more dialogue on how streaming platforms engage with Indian entertainers and the expectations they set for creative content. The Road Ahead for Indian Comedy on Streaming Kapil Sharma’s Netflix experience represents a larger shift in India’s entertainment industry. Streaming platforms have become a hub for diverse content – from drama and thriller series to reality shows and comedy specials. For Indian comedians, this creates exciting opportunities but also unprecedented scrutiny. Maintaining authenticity while satisfying global standards is a challenge that requires careful navigation. Kapil’s candid reflection provides a valuable lesson for aspiring entertainers. Success on international platforms is not just about talent or popularity; it is also about understanding the operational expectations, adapting to new creative standards, and being prepared to answer to detailed scrutiny. His phrase, “‘Hisaab dena hota hai,’” resonates as a reminder that professional accountability is part of global entertainment, even for India’s beloved stars. Conclusion Kapil Sharma’s revelation about the pressures he faced while working on The Great Indian Kapil Show provides a rare glimpse into the realities of global streaming production. While audiences see the laughter, jokes, and celebrity interactions, the behind-the-scenes pressures are immense, especially when transitioning from traditional television to a platform like Netflix. By openly acknowledging the accountability, Kapil Sharma not only humanizes the challenges faced by entertainers but also underscores the evolving landscape of Indian comedy in the digital era. His experience demonstrates that even established stars must adapt, innovate, and navigate pressures while keeping their signature humor intact – a balancing act that defines the future of entertainment in the age of global streaming platforms.
By Fiazahmedbrohi 7 days ago in Geeks
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.