China Won't Accept Any Country Acting as the 'World's Police' After U.S Captures Venezuela's President, China
In the wake of the United States’ controversial military operation in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, China has issued one of its strongest diplomatic statements in recent years — warning that no nation has the right to act as the “world’s police” or judge of international affairs. The rebuke reflects Beijing’s growing discomfort with U.S. unilateral military actions and highlights a broader struggle over global norms, sovereignty, and the future of international order. �
The Daily Star Bangla
A Bold Diplomatic Message from Beijing
China’s top diplomat, Foreign Minister Wang Yi, articulated Beijing’s position clearly during a recent meeting in Beijing, where he said that “[w]e have never believed that any country can act as the world’s police, nor do we accept that any nation can claim to be the world’s judge.” His remarks came as images and reports of Maduro’s capture emerged worldwide, shocking many observers and prompting intense debate about international law and national sovereignty. �
The Daily Star Bangla
The statement signals Beijing’s firm opposition to the U.S. action, which involved a large-scale military strike and the removal of a foreign head of state from his own capital. Although the U.S. characterized the operation as a legal enforcement action against charges of narcotics trafficking, China viewed it as a serious breach of established international norms. �
9News
Sovereignty First: China’s Consistent Foreign Policy Stance
China’s reaction is grounded in its long-standing non-interventionist foreign policy, which asserts that no country should interfere in the internal affairs of another. This principle has been central to China’s diplomatic posture, especially in disputes involving sovereignty, territorial integrity, and military intervention. In recent statements, Beijing reiterated that “the sovereignty and security of all countries should be fully protected under international law.” �
The Daily Star Bangla
Chinese officials have also expressed “deep shock” at the U.S. use of force against Venezuela, describing it as an act that “seriously violates international law, infringes upon Venezuela’s sovereignty, and threatens peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean.” These remarks came from the Chinese foreign ministry, which condemned the U.S. operation and urged Washington to respect the UN Charter and the principles of peaceful coexistence. �
Channels Television
The Broader Diplomatic Context
Beijing’s response did not occur in isolation. The United Nations Security Council convened at the request of several countries, including China and Russia, to discuss the U.S. military action. At that session, many member states expressed concerns that the operation could set a dangerous precedent for international relations. Critics argued that military interventions without broad international support risk undermining the rules-based system established after World War II and central to the UN’s purpose. �
The Guardian
China’s remarks also reflect broader tensions with the United States over global leadership roles. For decades, Washington has justified interventions in far-flung regions on the grounds of security, counterterrorism, or humanitarian need. Beijing, however, has increasingly challenged this narrative, insisting that it often serves as a cover for geopolitical dominance rather than genuine international cooperation. The recent events in Venezuela have given China an opportunity to amplify that critique. �
People's Daily
Implications for China–U.S. Relations
The diplomatic clash over Venezuela could have lasting implications for China–U.S. relations. Both powers are already engaged in strategic competition across the globe — from trade and technology to military posturing in the South China Sea and over Taiwan. China’s denunciation of the U.S. as a self-appointed global enforcer adds a new layer of ideological tension, with Beijing positioning itself as a defender of national sovereignty against what it sees as American unilateralism. �
The Daily Star Bangla
Yet the situation also presents China with a complex dilemma. Beijing has historically emphasized respect for international norms, but its own actions — particularly in regions like the South China Sea — have drawn criticism from the U.S. and its allies. As a result, China’s stance can be seen as part of a broader effort to assert moral authority while navigating its own controversial geopolitical behaviors. �
People's Daily
What This Means for Global Politics
China’s declaration that it will not accept any country acting as the “world’s police” goes beyond a simple rebuke of the United States. It signifies a deepening contest over the rules that govern international conduct, especially when powerful states take actions that bypass broader international consensus or oversight.
For many countries in the Global South — particularly those with histories of colonialism or military intervention — the idea that a single superpower can decide when and how to intervene is deeply unsettling. China is tapping into that sentiment, positioning itself not only as a rival to U.S. influence but also as a champion of a global system that respects sovereign equality. �
People's Daily
Conclusion: A Test of International Norms
As the world watches the fallout from the U.S. operation in Venezuela, China’s strong response highlights the ongoing struggle over global governance and power projection. By rejecting the notion that any one nation can police the world, Beijing is staking out a vision of international relations grounded in sovereignty and legalism — even as it uses the moment to critique its rival’s actions.
Whether this rhetoric will translate into concrete shifts in global alignments or policies remains uncertain. But one thing is clear: the debate over what constitutes legitimate international action is far from over — and the clash between Washington and Beijing will shape that debate for years to come. �
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.