FYI logo

The Human Downgrade: Did We Choose to Be Basic?

Humanity Divided: The Two-Class System and the trade of Humanity for Hierarchy

By Nida Mahmood Published 10 months ago 6 min read
The roots of true achievement lie in the will to become the best that you can become.

Humans are no longer seen as intelligent, knowable, geniuses, civilized, average, mediocre, uneducated , uncivilized , or uncultured; we are now divided into 2 and only 2 classes , rich or poor .

This classification is deeply disappointing because humans can achieve so much beyond just being labeled as rich or poor. We now acknowledge that the sky is no longer the limit for human intellect in seeking knowledge, when it comes to flawless rocket landings and artificial intelligence that can perform any task that a human can, given that the AI that we claim to be more capable than humans is actually a human invention.

Everywhere in the world we are attempting to place emphasis in science and technology, we have succeeded in instilling consciousness in AI , and promise more to come , realizing that all of this and more is merely a byproduct of the human brain and its ability to hold vast amounts of knowledge and memories, and yet we remain trapped in the notion that I possess more money than you, drive a larger vehicle, and own grand homes. So, even if you're exceptionally intelligent but reside in distitution due to various circumstances preventing you from earning that wealth, your brilliance is irrelevant

So why have we become so basic and have forgotten what we are capable of as humans?

We, as humans, find ourselves at strange and odd cross roads. At one time, we were adventurers, innovators, and profoundly interconnected souls, in harmony with the cycles of nature and the murmurs of our own possibilities.

And what has become of us now is just a nagging question that lingers: why have we become so...basic? Why has the rich diversity of human potential been simplified to a stark divide of “rich" and "poor"?

This decline is not merely an issue of resource distribution or political frameworks; it represents a deep ethical and emotional predicament, highlighting our shared inability to protect the fundamental nature of being human. It serves as an assessment of our capabilities, exposing the subtle methods by which we have permitted detachment and moral compromise to undermine the pillars of our humanity.

The core issue is the ever increasing emotional void. We have lost the ability to truly feel, to empathize, to connect, and even to manifest, which in turn has resulted in diminishing empathy , as we dispassionately witness any and every misery , near or far , and still we primarily focus on what benefits us most, and for many of us, this often relates to what brings us profit, influencing who deserves to be supported or guided to succeed in life .

This emotional disconnection fosters a gap between the "haves" and "have-nots," allowing the wealthy to ignore those who are less fortunate. We have absorbed an inaccurate sense of value, linking worth to material goods and social standing.

The outcome?

A suffocation of our natural creativity, a repression of our aspirations, and an overwhelming feeling of inferiority, separation from our mission, from the deep feeling of connection that previously characterized us, we struggle with despair and uncertainty.

And often, if we realize on some of the days to have a conscious? and we ask

What is the purpose of all that we are doing?

What is our purpose in this immense, complicated, and yet simple world, or rather the universe?

And unlike how we might have had superior and more valuable answers through our conscious mind in the past, we now often grapple with the answer and frequently lack awareness of the concept.

In the present world that we all live in , we have Commodified Humanity, We’ve reduced human beings to mere resources, to cogs in a machine. This dehumanization justifies exploitation, inequality, and the erosion of basic human rights. The pursuit of wealth and power has become our guiding principle, eclipsing ethical considerations. We sacrifice the planet; we ignore social injustices, all in the name of "progress. We’ve forgotten that we are interconnected and that our actions have consequences far beyond our immediate circles. We've retreated into our own bubbles, shirking our collective responsibility to create a just and sustainable world, tattooing

The "Rich/Poor" Wound,

That is nothing but a scar on our collective soul.

But! Do we actually feel, realize, and identify the "Rich/Poor" wound—a scar on our soul?

The current situation reveals a sad truth: that we consistently fail to acknowledge that possessing fewer financial resources does not diminish a person's value compared to those with more wealth.

The significant imbalance in resources brings up essential issues of equity and justice. How can we defend a system that permits a select few to accumulate riches while many others fight to get by? And here we are not just talking about the less privileged but also , those who are living quite well possess the means for a decent livelihood; they can cover all their necessities, perhaps in a modest home equipped with resources for a comfortable existence. Yet, instead of appreciating their blessings, due to societal disparities, they feel anxious and pressured about how to earn more to keep pace with the prevailing conditions of wealth that we are increasingly accepting as standard.

So the bigger question is who decides that money makes you more acceptable in the society then possessing knowledge, or rather who has put money and knowledge at war , and put up a sign board Money VS Knowledge

At the core of this occurrence is the capitalist structure, where economic production and wealth accumulation serve as key measures of achievement. This system inherently enhances the worth of money as a concrete symbol of success. The market economy inherently assigns measurable value to products and services, which also extends to individuals who manage the movement of capital.

So when we say some nations are capitalists, we are highly mistaken, because it looks like the whole world is following the same phenomenon; moreover current consumer culture, is fuelled by advertising and media, and highly promotes the link between material affluence and happiness as well as social standing.

The key factor that we are all aware of is that in social interactions, having greater wealth renders a person more significant and influential. High-end items, lavish homes, and extravagant ways of living serve as visual indicators of wealth and, thus, perceived social value.

Although knowledge can provide status, its acknowledgment is frequently more subtle and not as obvious right away, because the irony is that even a highly knowledgeable person needs to be wealthy to have his point mentioned and voice heard.

However, the prevailing societal narrative often tilts the scales in favor of wealth, shaping our perceptions of value, but we at all times need to acknowledge that the definition of happiness , achievement, and success is defined differently for different people. It also does not imply that a person with less wealth is not capable of making a high net worth , or creating a wealthy future for himself; it's simply that he defined happiness and success differently and chose to pursue his happiness and success rather than connecting it to money .

Time invested with family, nurturing your children, enjoying friendships, exploring, acquiring knowledge, and establishing a personal space—these countless emotions embody joy and accomplishment, and therefore, no individual should possess the power and right to provide a universal definition of happiness and success while also evaluating another person according to what they consider significant achievements or not.

Because!

For some, wealth equates to happiness, while others prioritize a more profound human connection.

HumanityVocalHistorical

About the Creator

Nida Mahmood

AML pro & coach. Full-time mom, empowering growth. Sharing insights on security & development. Lifelong learner."

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (1)

Sign in to comment
  • Nikita Angel9 months ago

    Good

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.