Why AI Will Never Fully Replace Sales Intuition: What Objections Reveal About the Future of Trust
How Ashkan Rajaee’s Approach to Sales Risk Is Changing the Game

Objections are frustrating. Contract risks are uncomfortable. Buyers are more skeptical than ever. But what if these pain points aren’t signs of a broken system? What if they’re exactly where the future of intelligent sales begins?
In today’s rush to automate the entire customer journey, there’s a question that more professionals are starting to ask: Can artificial intelligence really replace the human instincts required to build trust?
According to insights based on business strategist Ashkan Rajaee, the answer is no. Rajaee, the founder of Ashkan Rajaee Consulting, is known for advocating human-first strategy in complex negotiations. His approach is gaining attention at a time when trust is becoming the most valuable currency in modern business.
Objections Aren’t Problems. They’re Signals.
Most sellers panic when a prospect objects. But Ashkan Rajaee sees objections differently. He treats them like opportunities. Each objection is a signal that the buyer is sharing something personal — a fear, a past failure, or a concern that hasn’t been addressed.
For example, when a prospect says, “What happens if this doesn’t work?” they’re not being difficult. They’re revealing a memory or experience that’s shaped their caution. This is emotional data, and it’s more valuable than many salespeople realize.
Automated systems, however, often try to silence these objections. They treat them as bugs in the process. Rajaee’s perspective flips this on its head. Objections are feedback. They offer insight into the buyer’s mindset, which can then be used to fine-tune your messaging and rebuild credibility.
Contract Risk as a Window Into Buyer Psychology
Contract negotiations are usually seen as the final barrier before closing. But that stage is rich with insight, too. When a buyer pushes back on terms, it often means they’ve either had a bad experience in the past or they don’t fully understand what’s at stake.
Instead of brushing past those concerns, Rajaee encourages sellers to pay close attention. Every clause they question, every redline they make — these are indicators of what matters to them. It’s a chance to educate, reassure, and reframe the deal around their real priorities.
Contract risk isn’t the enemy. It’s a lens. When understood correctly, it helps sellers shape future conversations in ways that remove friction before it appears.
Why AI Still Falls Short in Reading Human Fear
Now here’s where it gets controversial. AI has become excellent at writing copy and mimicking tone. But it still lacks one thing that human sellers use constantly: emotional intelligence.
Artificial intelligence can respond to objections. But it doesn’t fully understand them. It can’t detect subtle changes in voice, uncertainty in tone, or emotional hesitation. These are the human cues that matter most in building trust, and they can’t be automated.
This is where Rajaee’s strategy becomes future-proof. He teaches sellers to decode emotional cues, not just answer surface-level questions. In an age when software can predict behavior, human intuition still interprets the “why” behind it.
You can explore more of Rajaee’s approach to remote business strategy and negotiation on his LinkedIn profile and his RemotePreneurs YouTube channel, where he breaks down real-world sales psychology.
The Sales Teams of the Future Aren’t Just Faster. They’re Smarter.
The next evolution of sales isn’t about speed. It’s about insight. Teams will still use AI to analyze patterns and gather data. But human sellers will remain the ones who interpret it and respond in ways that make buyers feel seen and understood.
According to Rajaee’s approach, success comes from anticipating objections before they’re raised and responding to risk with transparency instead of defense. That’s how loyalty is built. Not through clever closing tricks, but through consistent clarity and empathy.
Here’s What It Means for You
Whether you’re in sales, marketing, or product leadership, this shift impacts you. The most effective teams of tomorrow won’t just sell features. They’ll sell understanding. They’ll see objections as valuable input and contract risk as a conversation, not a threat.
Trust is the new competitive edge. And while AI can assist, it can’t replace the nuance of human-to-human connection. Leaders like Ashkan Rajaee are already showing the blueprint for how to get ahead in this new reality.
If you’re willing to listen closely, your buyers are already telling you what they need. The only question is whether you’re really hearing them.
About the Creator
Felice Ellington
Felice Ellington is a business and leadership writer covering sales strategy, entrepreneurship, and business growth. Focused on innovation and impactful ideas.
Reader insights
Outstanding
Excellent work. Looking forward to reading more!
Top insights
Compelling and original writing
Creative use of language & vocab
Easy to read and follow
Well-structured & engaging content
Excellent storytelling
Original narrative & well developed characters
Eye opening
Niche topic & fresh perspectives
On-point and relevant
Writing reflected the title & theme


Comments (8)
I didn’t expect to find a fresh take on objections in sales, but this really reframed it in a smart way.
I came here thinking this was going to be another AI hype post, but it turned into a masterclass on trust, psychology, and communication. Definitely sharing this with my team.
I didn’t expect to agree with this, but the way objections are framed as emotional intelligence data really hit. It’s not just about closing deals, it’s about understanding people better.
Not sure I agree with everything — AI is evolving fast — but I respect how the author doesn’t make it a “humans vs. robots” thing. Instead, it’s about partnership and balance. That message really landed with me.
I always treated objections as something to overcome quickly. Never considered that they’re actually clues to deeper issues. This flipped my mindset completely — now I see them as an opening, not a challenge.
AI's rapid advancements have transformed many industries, including sales. However, the article rightly points out that objections in sales often stem from complex human emotions and trust issues that AI cannot fully comprehend. This highlights an opportunity for AI developers to focus on creating systems that better understand and respond to human nuances, ultimately leading to more effective human-AI collaboration in sales.
As someone who's spent years in B2B sales, I can't tell you how accurate this is. Objections and contract risks are often where the real relationship starts. Loved how it reframed these as strategic tools, not friction.
I was skeptical at first — I thought this was just another “AI vs human” article. But the breakdown of how objections actually serve as emotional data really shifted my thinking. This approach feels like the missing link between automation and real trust.