Why Pluto Is No Longer Considered a Planet

Why Pluto Is No Longer Considered a Planet

For much of the 20th century, Pluto was proudly listed as the ninth planet in our solar system. Discovered in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh, Pluto held a cherished place in science books and public imagination. However, in 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) officially reclassified Pluto as a “dwarf planet,” sparking debate and disappointment among many. So, why did Pluto lose its planetary status? The answer lies in how astronomers define a planet—and how Pluto doesn’t quite fit the bill.

The Definition of a Planet

To understand Pluto’s demotion, we need to look at how scientists define what a planet is. For many years, there was no formal scientific definition. But as more distant, Pluto-like objects were discovered in the solar system, astronomers realized they needed a clear standard.

In 2006, the IAU—the authority responsible for naming and classifying celestial objects—established three criteria an object must meet to be considered a planet:

1. It must orbit the Sun.

2. It must be massive enough for its gravity to shape it into a nearly round object.

3. It must have “cleared the neighborhood” around its orbit.

Pluto meets the first two criteria: it orbits the Sun and is spherical due to its own gravity. The third requirement, however, is where Pluto falls short.

What Does “Cleared Its Neighborhood” Mean?

The phrase “cleared its neighborhood” means that the object has become gravitationally dominant in its orbit, having either absorbed or flung away other debris and objects nearby. In other words, a true planet should control the space around its orbit.

Pluto, however, shares its orbital zone with many other objects in the Kuiper Belt—a region beyond Neptune filled with icy bodies, dwarf planets, and debris. One of the key discoveries that challenged Pluto’s status was **Eris**, a distant object discovered in 2005. Eris is similar in size to Pluto and orbits in the same region. If Pluto was a planet, many argued, Eris should be one too. This raised concerns: if Pluto remained a planet, would the solar system suddenly have dozens or even hundreds of planets?

To maintain a manageable and scientifically sound definition, the IAU chose to reclassify Pluto and similar objects as **dwarf planets**. These are celestial bodies that meet the first two criteria of a planet but haven’t cleared their orbits.

The Emotional and Scientific Response

The reclassification of Pluto was met with mixed reactions. Many scientists supported the decision as a logical step forward in planetary science. Others, including some astronomers and members of the public, felt the decision was arbitrary or premature. Campaigns to “re-planet” Pluto even sprang up, and to this day, some planetary scientists argue for restoring Pluto’s status based on alternative definitions.

Despite the controversy, Pluto’s change in status hasn’t reduced its scientific importance. In fact, the 2015 New Horizons mission by NASA provided stunning new details about Pluto’s surface, atmosphere, and moons, proving that even dwarf planets can be incredibly complex and fascinating.

Conclusion

Pluto is no longer classified as a planet because it doesn't meet all three of the criteria set by the IAU in 2006—specifically, it has not cleared its orbital neighborhood. While this change was based on scientific reasoning, it also sparked passionate debate about how we define celestial objects. Pluto may have lost its planetary title, but it remains a key part of our solar system and a reminder that science evolves as our understanding deepens.

Thank you for reading my article. Follow me, Story