The Mystery of the Vanishing Undersea Cable

In 2021, an unexplained incident off the coast of Norway resulted in significant damage to a vital underwater data cable. The cause of the damage remained a mystery, causing a major disruption as no instruments or sensors functioned. The cable was simply missing, leaving chaos in its wake.

The seabed is home to an essential network of data cables that span hundreds of thousands of miles globally. These cables are crucial for information flow, communications, banking systems, and financial transactions, making the network incredibly vulnerable. Any damage could have catastrophic effects, potentially spreading panic and disrupting state functions. In recent years, multiple incidents involving undersea cables have raised concerns, suggesting they might not be mere accidents but possibly acts of sabotage.

The story began in 2021 with an ocean observatory in Norway that relied on an important data cable, which suddenly stopped working. G. Peterson, a lead researcher at the laboratory, used the data cable for marine life research. He explained that while light doesn’t travel far underwater, sound can provide a clear picture of underwater activities. Hydrophones, which are highly sensitive, can detect marine mammal sounds from great distances.

The observatory's instruments are located in the Norwegian Sea, attached to a long cable extending 30 miles out to sea. Interestingly, before the data reaches the observatory, it’s first processed by the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment, which filters out any sensitive information. Although the cable is intended for scientific research, it could pose a threat to NATO adversaries.

On April 6th, the observatory’s chief technical officer discovered the cable had stopped working on April 3rd. Despite attempts to reboot the system at the remote fishing village of Hoven in Western Norway, no data was flowing, indicating a severe problem. An anomaly along the cable’s path further out to sea led to the realization that the cable was missing entirely.

Initially, it was suspected that fishing activity might have caused the damage. In the area, fishing trawlers use large nets connected to steel trawler doors, which might have snagged the cable. Ship tracking data identified one vessel, potentially responsible, which had crossed the cable’s path. After six months, another underwater drone was sent to the suspected location and found the missing cable along the vessel's route.

When the damaged cable was retrieved, a precise, man-made cut was discovered, suggesting intentional sabotage. Norwegian police, led by prosecutor Ron Yurgenson, confirmed the cut was deliberate. Interviews with the crew of the suspected vessel, a Russian trawler named the Sammy, yielded no conclusive evidence linking them to the incident.

The investigation left three possibilities: the Sammy wasn’t involved, the damage was accidental and covered up, or it was an intentional act of sabotage. While the first option was plausible, the idea of multiple similar incidents raised suspicions.

Another incident occurred seven months later in the Svalbard archipelago, where a crucial cable connecting it to mainland Norway was damaged. This cable carried significant internet and satellite data. Tracks on the seabed indicated possible man-made interference. Ship tracking data pointed to a Russian trawler, the Melkart 5, which had crossed the cable numerous times before the damage.

Despite the evidence, prosecuting the case proved difficult due to the vast and remote nature of the high north. Experts suggested these incidents might be part of Russia’s unconventional warfare tactics, aiming to disrupt critical infrastructure.

The melting polar ice caps have increased the Arctic’s geopolitical importance, with new shipping lanes and rich natural resources. This has led to concerns that these cable incidents are deliberate acts of sabotage. Russian vessels have been found with military and surveillance equipment, raising further suspicions.

The motivation behind targeting a scientific cable remains unclear. It could be training for future attacks or a means of exerting pressure. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia's military struggled, leading to reliance on non-military tactics, including sabotage.

Regardless of whether these incidents began as accidents, they highlight the vulnerability of underwater infrastructure. The high north’s remoteness and vastness make it difficult to monitor and protect, leaving it susceptible to intentional damage by those with the necessary equipment.

Did you like this article? Will you like to be notified whenever I drop new articles? Please do subscribe, in order not to miss from my future articles.