Are drug screens considered a search

When a social worker lies in court, they don't get punished because they have immunity. But this doesn't mean they can lie on purpose. They only have immunity if they honestly believed what they said was true. If they lie on purpose, they can lose their immunity and be punished. It's important to understand that lying about someone is really wrong and shows a lack of care and empathy. The ninth commandment tells us not to lie about others. It's a moral duty to tell the truth. People, regardless of their religious beliefs, usually know that lying is wrong, especially when it's done under oath. So when a social worker intentionally lies to a judge, it's definitely the wrong thing to do.
There are different kinds of lies. Perjury is when someone lies under oath in court to try and affect the case. Slander is when someone says false things about another person, usually by spreading rumors, which can damage their reputation. Libel is when false information is written about someone, like publishing lies in a newspaper. All of these actions are considered harmful to a person's character.


Breaking the ninth commandment can also happen when someone purposely distorts the truth to deceive others. Intentionally misrepresenting the truth while under oath in court is taken very seriously. In the past, it was considered such a severe crime that those found guilty of giving false testimony would face the same punishment as the accused, even the death penalty. When a social worker lies in court, their motive is usually to get the outcome they want. It can be scary to stand up against intentional wrongdoing. However, if we don't confront those who harm us on purpose, nobody else will. Unfortunately, lack of accountability has contributed to the problems we face today.


I was stunned to discover that Adams County has ranked first for two consecutive years in the number of child removals. The way these professionals discuss families who are in need of cps intervention in meetings, in the news articles suggests a biased attitude that deeply alarms me. One person even claimed that when parents return home, they commit acts of rape, abuse, and starvation against their children. I obtained this information from an article in the People's Defender,

https://www.peoplesdefender.com/2021/12/02/emergency-meeting-held-at-courthouse-concerns-for-drugs-and-youth/




To make things clear, I strongly believe that protecting children is crucial, and there are cases where intervention is necessary. However, it's important to ensure that families are not being separated for the wrong reasons. That's why we have laws in place. The court and caseworkers cannot do whatever they want without being held accountable. They answer to someone higher up. A social worker must have a valid reason to enter your life and compel you to cooperate with them. Similarly, a judge must have a valid reason to enforce compliance and make you do something you disagree with.

Don't let these people intimidate you. Many of us feel scared when dealing with them, and I was no exception as a parent. However, we know right from wrong, and we understand that intentionally doing wrong when it involves a court will have consequences for the wrongdoer. It may be difficult to get someone to listen to your complaints because there are unfortunately many complaints made, and sometimes the complainers only tell one side of the story. As a result, when their complaints are investigated, it often reveals that there was a valid reason for the intervention.

If a caseworker has treated you unfairly and you know they are intentionally lying about you, don't give up after the first or second attempt to be heard. They hope that you will give up. These people hold positions of power and are highly respected by many, although I'm not entirely sure why anymore. We elect them into their positions based on trust, expecting them to carry out their duties with honesty and integrity. The abuse of positions of trust in Adams County is evident and concerning. I have found other ways to share my story and speak the truth. I refuse to passively accept the role of victim and allow my family to suffer from local corruption. Every member of my family can confirm our experiences, as our stories align. Our family has been unjustly separated, and no efforts are being made to fix the situation. We are even prohibited from speaking on the phone. It is not just my family who is suffering; something needs to be done.
I filed a complaint with the district court that complaint was dismissed
I filed a complaint with the US court of appeals and I'm waiting for a response. If the us court of appeals won't hear the case I'll go to the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court denies us I'll go to the OAS. By the time I'm done many people will have heard my story and the results will be beneficial one way or the other!












The court system that presides over multiple countries is known as an international court. There are several international courts and tribunals that handle cases involving disputes between countries or address specific areas of international law. Here are some notable examples:

1. International Court of Justice (ICJ): The ICJ, also known as the World Court, is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It settles legal disputes between countries and provides advisory opinions on legal questions submitted by authorized UN organs and agencies.

2. International Criminal Court (ICC): The ICC is a permanent tribunal established to prosecute individuals for crimes such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. It has jurisdiction over individuals from countries that have ratified the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding treaty.

3. European Court of Justice (ECJ): The ECJ is the highest court in the European Union (EU) and interprets EU law. It ensures the uniform interpretation and application of EU law across member states and settles legal disputes related to EU treaties and legislation.

4. African Court of Justice and Human Rights (AfCHPR): The AfCHPR is a regional court that handles cases related to human rights violations, disputes between African Union member states, and interpretation of African Union treaties.

5. Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR): The IACtHR is an autonomous judicial body of the Organization of American States (OAS) and hears cases related to human rights violations in member states of the OAS.

1. International Court of Justice (ICJ): The United States has accepted the jurisdiction of the ICJ in certain cases concerning disputes with other countries. However, the acceptance is on a case-by-case basis, and the United States has also exercised its right to opt out of the ICJ's jurisdiction for specific matters.

2. International Criminal Court (ICC): The United States has not ratified the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC. As a result, it is not a party to the ICC, and therefore, the court does not have jurisdiction over U.S. citizens or actions on U.S. territory.

It's important to note that the United States primarily operates within its own legal system and domestic courts, and its compliance with international law and involvement in international courts is based on its own decisions and agreements with other countries or international organizations.
Have you heard about the incident where ten people, including a bailiff, a probation officer, and sheriff's personnel, were treated at the local hospital due to fentanyl exposure? This is not the first time fentanyl has been a concern at our local sheriff's office. Interestingly, our sheriff's office is located on the bottom floor below the jail, and the probation office is just one floor above. These facilities are all connected in a small building. It's worth noting that our probation office conducts drug testing for the juvenile court.

Having experienced addiction myself, I want to clarify that I am not criticizing individuals who are still struggling with addiction. What I am trying to highlight are the circumstances surrounding the incident. WLWT 5 covered the story, and experts mentioned that the exposure to fentanyl significant enough to require hospitalization would likely have been voluntary. For those unfamiliar, it's important to understand that you can't absorb the drug through touch and experience its effects. If people could feel the drug's effects simply by touching it, nobody would inject it.


However, what happens when the very children who are claimed to need saving are placed in foster homes where they face physical or sexual abuse, or worse? When a social worker resorts to providing false information to obtain a court order, it indicates a lack of consideration for the child's best interests. Throughout my life, I have been exposed to foster children who shared horrifying stories with me. I used to believe that when adults claimed someone had lied to take their children away or to incriminate them, it was an attempt to evade responsibility for their own actions. If you find yourself in a similar mindset, I urge you to pause and consider the possibility that their claims might be true. I can personally attest that such situations do occur, especially when authorities have already made up their minds and refuse to listen to the other side of the story.

In my case, no investigation was conducted in my home before the court orders were granted. My interactions with CPS ended positively. In fact, the same social worker who falsified testimony against me sent me a letter in 2018, acknowledging numerous strengths in my family, including our ability to protect, care for, and provide for our children without the need for their services. Our children did not require saving from us. We love them deeply and have always met their needs. The court should have taken our children's testimonies into account during the hearings, but their feelings have never been considered. I can guarantee that if asked, they would express their desire to come back home. They were happy, healthy, well-cared for, always clean, dressed in clean clothes, and had regular meals. They had virtual reality headsets and flat-screen TVs. Their medical needs were never neglected. We attended to their emotional well-being, paying attention to their moods, asking about their day, and spending quality time with each child individually because it is important. Our children mean the world to us, and it is morally wrong for anyone to feel entitled to lie under oath to obtain a court order, invade our home, and coerce us into signing documents we clearly expressed our refusal to sign. I will never cease fighting for my family, and I implore everyone to protect their own families to the best of their abilities, as this issue is pervasive. I read documents from a woman whose lawyer actually suggested that relinquishing her parental rights would solve her problems. Once again, I was astonished. Stay safe, everyone.