Manual Testing Still a Good Career Choice in 2024
Manual Testing
What is Manual Testing
Manual testing is a method of software testing which means the tester checks every step manually to find out the bugs, defects, and problems in the particular software. Manual testing changes in the sphere of software testing due to AI and automation. Still, it’s proved that manual testing is an essential part of quality assurance, and many people who consider themselves testers ask it is possible to have a job as a tester in 2024. The answer is yes, but not in its traditional manner and not without condition.
The Role of Manual Testing in 2024
While automation testing continues to gain traction, manual testing holds its ground in specific areas where human intuition and creativity are indispensable:
1. Exploratory Testing
Automated testing scripts can be developed mostly in a linear way, while testing means that the tester has to use his or her imagination. This approach is of great value for discovering emerging problems.
2. Usability Testing
It’s important when it comes to UX, design, and applications for human interaction or to check if there are examples of poor design, etc.
3. Ad-Hoc Testing
In creating fast and undirected testing, for example, manual testers are better performing in the field since they have the flexibility of doing some ad hoc testing sometimes, thus, they are likely to discover some tests that automated tests cannot discover.
4. Early-Stage Testing
Manual testing is performed to make sure that the new features or builds on an application are working properly before automation scripts are written.
5. Complex Scenarios
It is impossible to perform most testing scenarios containing graphics, relying on a person’s subjective opinion, or using randomness.
Manual Testing Career Path in 2024
Here’s how a manual tester can advance their career:
1. QA Analyst: Begin with learning the most fundamental concepts of performing a manual test.
2. QA Specialist: Being specific and choosing areas of interest such as mobile, game, or usability testing.
3. Test Lead/Manager: Supervise testing procedures and substructures.
4. Automation Testing Expert: A shift to the new approach that will incorporate both manual and automated testing.
5. Quality Engineering Roles: The main emphasis is made on test strategy, performance engineering, and CI/CD integration.
The Industries that Manual Testing is Dominating
1. Healthcare
Manual testing helps regulate those strict legal requirements and raise user safety levels.
2. Gaming
Games need inventive and perceptive approaches to identifying issues of being tricky and inconsistent in being responsive to player feedback.
3. E-commerce
The flow, the navigation, and the checkout should be tested to help the client have a favorable experience.
4. Mobile Apps
Manual testing confirms the compatibility of several platforms and the similarity of the appearance of interfaces to users.
The Importance of Manual Testing in Modern Development
1. Human-Centric Validation
Technology is best at tangible and routine aspects like layouts, designs, navigations, and visual impacts but not at evaluating the pleasure or beauty of a design. Manual testers may apply more human mentality, which is especially valuable for still customer-oriented applications.
2. Applications to the Practice for Small-Scale Projects
This can be so because for small-scale projects or startups, for instance, it is cheaper to perform the tests manually than buy software that will support the automation testing.
3. Complement to Automation
Manual and automation testing cannot be viewed as rivals; they are complementary rather. Automation is used for handling system-driven aspects and on the other hand manual testing is used for exploratory and usage aspects.
4. Industry-Specific Needs
Companies in sectors like health care, gaming, or mobile applications still largely employ manual testing for compliance, functionality, and usability.
Future Challenges for Manual Testers
1. Automation Dominance
Automation tools have increasingly become popular and have centralized the recruitment of technical positions.
2. Limited Career Growth
When there are no opportunities for diversification, it does take longer to climb the ladder up the ranks of pure manual testing.
3. Demand for Technical Skills
Testers are now and again required to have elementary skills in automation tools and scripting languages.
Conclusion
Manual testing but new opportunities and the road ahead look challenging they will have to struggle to demand automation, the use of Artificial Intelligence in testing, and high-volume development. Nevertheless, there is a strong demand for manual testing because it is highly significant for tasks that involve creative and instinctive thinking, user experience verification, and decision-making. The authors argue that manual testers can continue to contribute to software development processes in the future by adopting new technologies, improving their knowledge, and focusing on specific testing areas that can benefit from manual testing.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Jeroshiya Jeroshiya and writers in Education and other communities.
Top 5 XML File Viewer You Should Consider in 2024
Introduction: What is an XML File Viewer? The format that is frequently applied for storing and further transportation of data is known as Extensible Markup Language, abbreviated as XML file viewer. The philosophy behind the XML is that it needs to be formatted with carrier data readable by both men and machines. Often web services use XML files in their work and for configuration files, and it is in such cases that handling XML files using the contents is very inefficient when using a simple text editor if large files work or if complex structures are processed.
By Jeroshiya Jeroshiyaabout a year ago in Education
Beyond Algorithms: The Human-AI Connection
It began as a routine assignment. Sofia, a cognitive scientist, had been asked to test a new AI interface called Elios, designed to assist in emotional intelligence training. At first, she thought it would be like any other experiment—data points, behavior patterns, predictive modeling—but what she discovered went far beyond numbers and code.
By hazrat aliabout 16 hours ago in Education
Professors Are Being Watched: ‘We’ve Never Seen This Much Surveillance’
University professors across several countries are reporting an unprecedented rise in monitoring of their teaching, research, and public speech, raising concerns about academic freedom and the future of open inquiry. From recorded lectures and classroom informants to digital tracking and social media scrutiny, faculty members say the level of surveillance they now face is unlike anything seen in modern higher education. Civil liberties groups warn that the trend reflects a broader climate of political polarization, national security anxiety, and ideological conflict that is reshaping universities into contested spaces where professors are increasingly treated as potential risks rather than independent scholars. “We’ve never seen this much surveillance of faculty,” said a senior researcher at an academic freedom watchdog organization. “What used to be isolated incidents are now becoming systematic.” Monitoring Inside the Classroom In several recent cases, students have recorded lectures without professors’ knowledge and submitted clips to outside advocacy groups or government agencies, accusing instructors of political bias or inappropriate speech. Some professors say administrators have quietly installed additional classroom recording systems or requested access to lecture content in advance. At a large public university in the United States, a history professor described receiving an email from administrators informing him that his lectures would be reviewed after complaints from anonymous sources. “It felt like I was being interrogated rather than evaluated,” he said. “My course is about political movements. That alone seems to make it suspicious now.” Universities defend some monitoring as part of quality control or compliance with harassment and discrimination policies. But faculty unions argue that the line between oversight and surveillance is being crossed. Digital Surveillance and Social Media Scrutiny Beyond the classroom, professors say their online lives are increasingly under watch. Academic tweets, blog posts, and even private comments in virtual classrooms have been flagged and forwarded to employers or politicians. In one case, a professor specializing in Middle Eastern politics faced an internal investigation after screenshots of a social media post criticizing a foreign government were circulated by a political group. Although no formal wrongdoing was found, the professor said the experience was chilling. “You start thinking twice before speaking,” she said. “That’s the point of surveillance—it creates fear.” Cybersecurity experts note that universities now use software that can track email communications, monitor internal messaging platforms, and analyze lecture recordings for “compliance risks.” While such tools were initially designed for data protection and campus safety, they are increasingly applied to content and behavior. Political Pressure and National Security Concerns Governments in several countries have expanded scrutiny of academic institutions in the name of national security. Laws requiring disclosure of foreign research funding, collaborations, and travel have grown stricter, particularly for scientists and political scholars working on China, Russia, the Middle East, and emerging technologies. In some regions, faculty members must report contacts with overseas colleagues or face penalties. Critics argue these measures blur the line between legitimate security concerns and ideological policing. “Universities are becoming extensions of the security state,” said a legal scholar who studies higher education policy. “That fundamentally changes what universities are supposed to be.” The pressure is not limited to authoritarian countries. Democratic nations have also seen increased political involvement in curriculum decisions and research agendas, especially on topics such as race, gender, war, and foreign policy. Impact on Teaching and Research Many professors report self-censorship as a result of constant scrutiny. Sensitive topics are avoided, controversial authors removed from syllabi, and classroom debates tightly controlled to prevent misunderstandings. A sociology professor said she now records every lecture herself for legal protection. “I need proof of what I actually said,” she explained. “It’s defensive teaching.” Graduate students and junior faculty are especially vulnerable. Without tenure protections, they risk losing jobs or funding if accused of violating vague conduct rules. Some universities have also introduced anonymous reporting systems that allow students or staff to flag instructors for “concerning behavior.” While intended to promote inclusion, faculty groups warn these systems can be weaponized for political or personal grievances. Universities Defend Policies University administrators insist that surveillance measures are not meant to suppress ideas but to ensure safety and accountability. Many point to rising threats, online harassment, and campus tensions as reasons for stronger monitoring systems. “We are responsible for protecting students and staff,” said a university spokesperson. “That includes responding to complaints and maintaining respectful learning environments.” However, transparency remains a key concern. Faculty members often do not know when they are being monitored, how data is used, or who has access to recordings and reports. A Global Trend International academic organizations say the problem is growing worldwide. In Europe, new laws regulating “political neutrality” in classrooms have raised alarms. In parts of Asia and the Middle East, surveillance of professors has long been common, but digital tools have made it far more pervasive. “What’s new is the scale and technology,” said an official from a global education group. “Surveillance used to be physical. Now it’s constant and invisible.” The Future of Academic Freedom Legal challenges are beginning to emerge. Faculty unions and civil rights groups are pushing for clearer boundaries between legitimate oversight and intrusive monitoring. Some courts have ruled that academic speech deserves strong protection, but enforcement remains uneven. For many professors, the fear is not just disciplinary action but the erosion of trust between teachers and students. “The classroom should be a place of curiosity and disagreement,” one professor said. “If everyone is watching everyone else, that disappears.” As universities balance safety, politics, and technology, the question remains whether higher education can preserve its core mission: fostering independent thought in an age of constant observation. The answer may determine not only the future of academia, but the health of democratic debate itself.
By Fiaz Ahmed a day ago in Education
The Piggy Project
I’ve had so many names in this life I lose track of which ones were ever really mine and which ones I wore because someone needed me to. Some were handed to me before I had words to refuse them, before I knew what they meant, before I knew I could say no. Most weren’t meant to hurt. That doesn’t mean they didn’t leave marks. Marks that told me who I belong to, who I am by way of who claims me, recognizes me in the good and bad, who walks beside me.
By Fatal Serendipity4 days ago in Confessions
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.