7 Critical Mistakes in Architectural Construction Drawings That Delay Your Permit

Permit delays are one of the most frustrating bottlenecks in construction projects. While some delays are unavoidable, many stem from preventable errors in architectural construction drawings. These mistakes can set your project back weeks or even months, inflating costs and straining client relationships.

After reviewing thousands of permit applications, building departments consistently flag the same issues. Here are the seven most critical mistakes that delay permits—and practical strategies to avoid them.

1. Incomplete or Inconsistent Dimensions

The Problem: Missing dimensions, conflicting measurements between plan views and elevations, or vague callouts like "field verify" create uncertainty for plan reviewers. When dimensions don't align across different sheets, reviewers must request clarification before approving your permit.

How to Avoid It:

• Cross-reference all dimensions across floor plans, elevations, and sections
• Use a consistent dimensioning system throughout the drawing set
• Dimension to structural elements, not finishes
• Include overall building dimensions on every relevant sheet
• Run a final coordination check before submission, specifically looking for dimensional conflicts

Pro Tip: Create a dimension verification checklist and have a second set of eyes review critical measurements before submission.

2. Missing Code Compliance Documentation

The Problem: Building officials need proof that your design meets current building codes. Missing fire ratings, inadequate egress calculations, or unclear accessibility features will trigger an immediate rejection or request for additional information.

How to Avoid It:

Include a code summary sheet that outlines applicable codes and how you're meeting them

• Clearly label fire-rated assemblies with ratings and U.L. numbers
• Show egress paths with travel distances calculated and noted
• Detail accessibility features with dimensions that clearly meet ADA/local requirements
• Include occupancy calculations and life safety diagrams
• Reference specific code sections in your notes when addressing requirements

Pro Tip: Schedule a pre-submittal meeting with the building department to discuss code-related questions before finalizing drawings.

3. Inadequate Site Plan Information

The Problem: Site plans lacking setback dimensions, utility connections, grading information, or property line clarity force reviewers to reject applications. This is especially problematic because site plan corrections often require coordination with civil engineers or surveyors.

How to Avoid It:

• Show all property lines with bearings and distances from a recent survey
• Clearly dimension setbacks from property lines to building faces
• Include existing and proposed utility connections (water, sewer, gas, electric)
• Show grading with spot elevations and drainage patterns
• Indicate parking spaces, accessibility routes, and landscaping requirements
• Include a vicinity map and north arrow on every sheet
• Add existing structures and trees that may be affected

Pro Tip: Always work from a current survey and coordinate with civil engineers early in the design process.

4. Unclear or Conflicting Details and Notes

The Problem: Generic notes, contradictory information between sheets, or details that don't match the design create confusion. When reviewers can't understand your intent or spot contradictions, they must stop the review process to seek clarification.

How to Avoid It:

• Remove boilerplate notes that don't apply to your specific project
• Ensure wall sections match floor plans and elevations
• Cross-reference details with sheet and detail numbers
• Use a consistent notation system across all sheets
• Clarify which notes take precedence when conflicts arise
• Make sure all abbreviations are included in a legend

Pro Tip: Create project-specific note sets rather than carrying forward generic notes from previous projects.

5. Missing Structural Information

The Problem: Even if you're not providing full structural drawings, architectural plans need sufficient structural information for initial review. Missing beam sizes, unclear foundation systems, or absent roof framing plans will delay approval until structural details are provided.

How to Avoid It:

• Coordinate with structural engineers before submitting architectural drawings

• Show beam and column locations on floor plans
• Include foundation plan with footing sizes and depths
• Provide roof framing plan with member sizes and spacing
• Note lateral force-resisting system
• Indicate floor loads and live/dead load requirements
• Include structural notes that reference engineer's calculations

Pro Tip: Submit architectural and structural drawings together as a complete package whenever possible.

6. Energy Code Non-Compliance or Missing Documentation

The Problem: Energy codes have become increasingly stringent, and missing energy calculations, unclear insulation values, or inadequate window specifications will stop your permit in its tracks. Many jurisdictions now require specific energy modeling or compliance forms.

How to Avoid It:

• Include insulation values on wall sections and roof details
• Specify window U-values and SHGC (Solar Heat Gain Coefficient)
• Show HVAC system type and efficiency ratings
• Complete required energy compliance forms (COMcheck, REScheck, etc.)
• Detail air sealing and vapor barrier systems
• Include lighting power density calculations for commercial projects
• Show mechanical ventilation strategies

Pro Tip: Use energy compliance software early in design to identify potential issues before finalizing drawings.

7. Poor Sheet Organization and Title Block Information

The Problem: Missing title blocks, unclear sheet numbering, outdated revision dates, or disorganized drawing sets make it difficult for reviewers to navigate your submission. This creates unnecessary friction and can result in overlooked information or delayed reviews.

How to Avoid It:

• Use a logical sheet numbering system (A-100, A-200, etc.)
• Ensure every sheet has a complete title block with project name, address, date, and revision information
• Include a sheet index on the cover sheet
• Keep similar information grouped (all floor plans together, all elevations together)
• Use consistent scales and note them clearly on each drawing
• Include all required professional stamps and signatures
• Date and track revisions clearly with delta triangles or clouds

Pro Tip: Create a submission checklist based on your local jurisdiction's requirements and verify every item before submitting.

The Bottom Line

Most permit delays from drawing errors are entirely preventable with proper coordination, thorough reviews, and attention to detail.

The key is implementing systematic quality control measures:

• Create jurisdiction-specific checklists based on local requirements
• Schedule internal plan checks before external submission
• Coordinate with consultants early and often
• Budget time for pre-submittal meetings with building departments
• Learn from rejections by maintaining a lessons-learned database

Remember, the time invested in getting your drawings right the first time is significantly less than the time lost to resubmissions and permit delays. A thorough, well-coordinated drawing set not only speeds up permit approval but also reduces construction issues down the line.

By avoiding these seven critical mistakes, you'll establish a reputation for quality submissions, build better relationships with building departments, and keep your projects moving forward on schedule.

Further Reading

How 3D Building Scanning is Transforming the Real Estate Industry?

As Built Services - Transform Plans with Precision