You Won’t Believe These 5 Real Animals Actually Exist
From cube-shaped poop to see-through heads, nature’s weirdest creatures are very real — and totally fascinating.
Nature has a way of surprising us. Just when you think you’ve seen it all, the animal kingdom throws in a creature so bizarre, it feels like it escaped from a science fiction movie. From transparent heads to cube-shaped poop, here are five animals that seem too strange to be real—but absolutely are.
1. The Star-Nosed Mole
This small, almost blind mole looks like it stuck its face into a sea anemone. Its nose has 22 pink, fleshy tentacles that it uses to "feel" its way around underground and underwater. These tentacles are covered in over 25,000 tiny touch receptors, making it the most sensitive touch organ in the animal kingdom.
Living in the wetlands of North America, the star-nosed mole is also an excellent swimmer. It uses air bubbles to sniff underwater, a behavior rarely seen in mammals. Fun fact? It can identify and eat prey in less than 0.25 seconds—faster than any other mammal.
2. The Axolotl
Forever young? The axolotl, a type of salamander, never goes through metamorphosis like its amphibian cousins. Instead, it stays in its juvenile form for life, complete with feathery external gills and a permanently wide smile.
Native to the lakes surrounding Mexico City, axolotls are critically endangered in the wild due to pollution and habitat loss. Despite their rarity, they are commonly bred in captivity for research and as exotic pets. What makes them truly special? They can regenerate entire limbs, parts of their heart, and even portions of their brain. Scientists are studying them to better understand tissue regeneration in humans.
3. The Barreleye Fish
Imagine a fish with a transparent head—because that’s exactly what the barreleye has. Found in the deep ocean, its head is see-through, revealing two glowing green barrel-shaped eyes inside. These eyes can rotate within the skull, allowing it to look both forward and upward to track prey in the pitch-black deep sea.
Discovered over 80 years ago, it wasn’t until 2004 that scientists managed to observe a live specimen. Its bizarre anatomy initially baffled researchers, especially because its eyes appeared to be in the wrong place. It turns out those upward-facing eyes are perfect for spotting prey silhouetted against faint light above.
4. The Wombat
Wombats may look like cuddly mini bears, but there’s something truly unique about them: they poop cubes. Yes, really. These Australian marsupials have slow digestion and an oddly shaped intestine that compresses waste into cubes.
Scientists believe the cube shape prevents the poop from rolling away, helping wombats mark their territory more effectively. This unusual digestive trick has even inspired engineers to study how soft tissue can form geometric shapes—a concept with applications in manufacturing and robotics.
5. The Leafy Sea Dragon
Looking more like a drifting piece of seaweed than a living creature, the leafy sea dragon is a master of camouflage. Native to the southern coast of Australia, this relative of the seahorse is covered in leaf-like appendages that help it blend in perfectly with its underwater surroundings.
Despite its delicate appearance, the leafy sea dragon is a strong swimmer. Unlike most fish, it relies on tiny, nearly invisible fins for movement, making it appear as if it's floating effortlessly through the water. They feed on small crustaceans and plankton, and due to habitat degradation, they are now listed as a near-threatened species.
Final Thought
It’s easy to think of nature as predictable—birds, fish, lions, and bears. But these five creatures remind us that evolution has a wild imagination. The world is full of surprises, and sometimes, the weirdest things are also the most real.
So the next time you think you’ve seen everything nature has to offer, remember: somewhere out there, a mole is sniffing underwater with star-shaped tentacles. And a wombat is casually pooping cubes.
Reality isn’t always ordinary—and that’s what makes it extraordinary.
About the Creator
Trump’s Housing Plan Casts Wall Street as the Villain — But He’s Targeting the Wrong Culprit
The American housing crisis has become one of the most emotionally charged issues in modern politics. Homeownership, once seen as a cornerstone of the American Dream, now feels out of reach for millions. Against this backdrop, Donald Trump’s latest housing proposals aim to revive affordability — and they do so by placing Wall Street squarely in the role of villain. At first glance, this message resonates. Large investment firms buying single-family homes, rising rents, and speculative real estate practices have fueled public frustration. But while Wall Street certainly plays a role, Trump’s housing plan risks oversimplifying a complex problem — and by doing so, it may miss the real drivers of America’s housing shortage. What Trump’s Housing Plan Is Trying to Do Trump’s rhetoric on housing centers on a familiar populist theme: powerful financial elites are squeezing everyday Americans out of the market. His plan suggests limiting institutional investors’ influence, loosening regulations, and promoting homeownership through market-friendly reforms. The message is clear and politically effective. By casting Wall Street as the enemy, the plan appeals to working-class voters struggling with high rents and rising mortgage rates. It also fits neatly into Trump’s broader narrative of standing up to elites on behalf of “ordinary Americans.” However, housing affordability is not a single-villain story. It is the result of decades of policy choices, local governance failures, and economic pressures that go far beyond investment firms. Wall Street’s Role Is Real — But Limited There is no denying that large financial institutions have entered the housing market aggressively, especially after the 2008 financial crisis. With access to cheap capital, institutional investors bought distressed homes in bulk, converting many into rental properties. This practice reduced housing supply for individual buyers in certain markets and pushed prices higher in some regions. In cities like Atlanta, Phoenix, and parts of Texas, Wall Street-backed landlords now own a noticeable share of single-family rentals. Yet nationally, institutional investors still own a relatively small percentage of total housing stock. Their presence may amplify affordability problems in specific areas, but they are not the primary cause of the nationwide housing shortage. The Real Crisis: America Doesn’t Build Enough Homes The core problem in U.S. housing is painfully simple: supply has failed to keep up with demand. For decades, America has underbuilt housing. Local zoning laws restrict multi-family construction, height limits constrain density, and lengthy approval processes delay or kill new developments. In many cities, it is illegal to build anything other than single-family homes across vast residential areas. These restrictions are enforced not by Wall Street, but by local governments responding to political pressure from homeowners who oppose new development. This phenomenon, often called “NIMBYism” (Not In My Back Yard), has quietly become one of the biggest barriers to affordable housing. Without addressing zoning and land-use reform, no housing plan — conservative or progressive — can meaningfully lower prices. Interest Rates and Inflation Matter More Than Investors Another factor Trump’s plan largely sidesteps is the role of interest rates. Mortgage rates surged in recent years as the Federal Reserve raised rates to fight inflation. Higher rates dramatically reduce purchasing power, locking many buyers out of the market even when home prices stabilize. Inflation also raises construction costs, from labor to materials, making new housing more expensive to build. Developers, facing tighter margins, often choose luxury projects over affordable units. Blaming Wall Street may be politically convenient, but it does nothing to address these macroeconomic realities that shape housing affordability nationwide. Why Scapegoating Wall Street Misses the Mark Casting Wall Street as the primary villain risks leading policy in the wrong direction. Restricting institutional investors without expanding supply could actually worsen the crisis by discouraging investment in new housing construction. Moreover, focusing on financial elites allows politicians to avoid tougher conversations about local zoning reform, environmental review processes, and community resistance to development — issues that cut across party lines and anger powerful local constituencies. Housing is one of the rare policy areas where both left- and right-leaning economists broadly agree: more supply is essential. Without it, prices will remain high no matter who owns existing homes. A More Effective Housing Strategy If the goal is genuine affordability, a successful housing plan must prioritize: Zoning reform to allow duplexes, apartments, and mixed-use development Faster permitting processes to reduce construction delays Incentives for affordable housing development, not just luxury units Support for first-time homebuyers that does not inflate prices further Infrastructure investment to expand livable areas beyond major cities None of these solutions are politically easy. They require cooperation between federal, state, and local governments — and they lack the simplicity of blaming a single villain. Politics vs. Policy in the Housing Debate Trump’s housing rhetoric reflects a broader trend in American politics: emotionally satisfying narratives often outperform nuanced policy discussions. Wall Street makes for a compelling antagonist, especially in an era of economic anxiety and distrust of large institutions. But housing affordability is not a morality play. It is a structural problem rooted in decades of underbuilding, restrictive local policies, and economic shifts. Solving it requires uncomfortable reforms, not just powerful speeches. Conclusion: The Wrong Villain Won’t Fix the Right Problem Trump’s housing plan taps into real frustration, and it is not wrong to question the growing influence of large investors in residential real estate. However, by framing Wall Street as the central cause of the housing crisis, the plan risks distracting from deeper, more entrenched issues. America’s housing problem will not be solved by targeting a single group. It will only be solved by building more homes, reforming outdated policies, and confronting the political resistance that has long blocked meaningful change. Until then, the American Dream of homeownership will remain just that — a dream — for millions who are still waiting for leaders to address the real problem.
By Muhammad Hassan5 days ago in Earth
Things you don't know about Africa
Africa: What You Probably Didn’t Know Article No. 1671 Tuesday, 25 February 2020 By Wardah Baloch In terms of land area, Africa is the second-largest continent in the world. It covers nearly 22 percent of the world’s total landmass and about 6 percent of the Earth’s total surface area. Only Asia is larger than Africa in size.
By Sudais Zakwana day ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.