Wondering fact about 7 wonders of the world
A crosscheck
In 2007, a global initiative was launched to select the new Seven Wonders of the World from a list of 200 potential candidates. The campaign was aimed at promoting cultural diversity and encouraging people to appreciate the world's natural and man-made wonders. The final list of the modern Seven Wonders of the World was announced on July 7, 2007. Let's take a closer look at how the new wonders were chosen.
The New Seven Wonders Foundation, a Swiss-based organization, was responsible for organizing the campaign to select the new wonders. The organization was founded by Swiss adventurer and filmmaker Bernard Weber, who sought to create a global platform to recognize the world's most amazing feats of engineering and architecture.
The selection process involved a worldwide online voting system that invited people from all over the world to vote for their favorite wonders. The voting was conducted in seven rounds, and the top seven vote-getters were selected as the new Seven Wonders of the World.
The new Seven Wonders of the World are:
- The Great Wall of China
- Petra, Jordan
- Christ the Redeemer Statue, Brazil
- Machu Picchu, Peru
- Chichen Itza, Mexico
- Colosseum, Italy
- Taj Mahal, India
So why were these particular sites chosen? Let's take a closer look at each of the new wonders:
The Great Wall of China: The Great Wall is one of the most impressive engineering feats in human history, and it stretches over 13,000 miles across China. The wall was built over several centuries to protect China from invaders and is regarded as one of the greatest architectural accomplishments of all time.
Petra, Jordan: Petra is an ancient city carved into the rock cliffs of Jordan, and it is one of the most significant archaeological sites in the world. The city was the capital of the Nabatean Kingdom and was an important trading hub in ancient times.
Christ the Redeemer Statue, Brazil: The Christ the Redeemer statue is an iconic symbol of Brazil and is one of the most recognizable statues in the world. The statue stands over 98 feet tall and overlooks the city of Rio de Janeiro.
Machu Picchu, Peru: Machu Picchu is an ancient Incan city located high in the Andes Mountains of Peru. The city was built in the 15th century and was abandoned by the Incas during the Spanish conquest. It was rediscovered in 1911 and is now a popular tourist destination.
Chichen Itza, Mexico: Chichen Itza is a complex of Mayan ruins located in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico. The site is home to a variety of architectural and artistic wonders, including the famous El Castillo pyramid and the Temple of the Warriors.
Colosseum, Italy: The Colosseum is a massive amphitheater located in Rome, Italy. It was built over 2,000 years ago and was used for gladiatorial contests, animal hunts, and other public spectacles.
Taj Mahal, India: The Taj Mahal is a mausoleum located in Agra, India. It was built in the 17th century by the Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan as a tribute to his late wife. The Taj Mahal is regarded as one of the most beautiful buildings in the world and is a symbol of Indian culture and history.
In conclusion, the modern Seven Wonders of the World were chosen based on a global voting system that invited people from all over the world to vote for their favorite wonders. The selection process was aimed at promoting cultural diversity and celebrating the world's most amazing feats of engineering and architecture. So that's the wondering fact about the wonders of the world!!!
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Anagha U M and writers in Earth and other communities.
Unveiling the mysteries of earth
The mysteries of the Earth have long captivated scientists and laypeople alike, as there are many phenomena and events that remain unexplained. Despite our advances in technology and scientific understanding, there are still many enigmas that persist, leaving us with questions and speculation about the nature of our planet.
By Anagha U M3 years ago in Earth
US Lawmakers Arrive in Copenhagen to Counter Trump’s Greenland Threats
In a high-stakes diplomatic maneuver, a delegation of U.S. lawmakers recently arrived in Copenhagen to discuss Greenland’s future, aiming to counteract the aggressive rhetoric and territorial ambitions expressed by former President Donald Trump. The visit comes amid rising concerns over Greenland’s strategic importance in the Arctic and the implications of any unilateral moves by the United States. For Denmark, Greenland’s autonomous territory, the presence of U.S. lawmakers underscores both Washington’s interest in Arctic security and the need to maintain strong transatlantic ties. For the United States, the visit signals a delicate recalibration of policy following Trump’s controversial proposals regarding Greenland, including his infamous attempt to buy the island outright during his presidency. Why Greenland Matters Geopolitically Greenland is more than a frozen expanse of ice; it is a geopolitical prize. Strategically located between North America and Europe, Greenland is key to: Arctic shipping routes that are becoming increasingly navigable due to melting ice Natural resources, including rare earth minerals, oil, and gas reserves Military and surveillance installations, notably the Thule Air Base, which is critical to U.S. missile warning systems and space surveillance The Arctic region is warming faster than any other part of the planet, making Greenland both a resource hub and a potential flashpoint for international competition. Trump’s proposals had alarmed Denmark and other NATO allies, raising questions about the United States’ long-term commitment to respecting international norms and allied sovereignty. The Lawmakers’ Mission The delegation, composed of senators and representatives from both political parties, is tasked with: Reassuring Denmark that the U.S. government respects Greenland’s autonomy Discussing security cooperation, particularly regarding Arctic defense and NATO commitments Exploring economic partnerships that benefit Greenland while maintaining regional stability Officials emphasize that this visit is not about reversing Trump’s statements retroactively, but about ensuring that future U.S. policy reflects diplomatic consensus rather than unilateral ambition. Denmark’s Response Denmark has maintained a firm stance on Greenland’s sovereignty, consistently stating that the island is not for sale. Danish leaders have welcomed the U.S. delegation as a positive step toward strengthening trust and clarifying intentions. Copenhagen also hopes to use the opportunity to reinforce cooperative approaches to Arctic security, particularly in light of growing Russian and Chinese interest in the region. For Denmark, maintaining strong relations with the United States — while safeguarding Greenland’s autonomy — is a balancing act that requires careful diplomacy. Greenland’s Perspective Greenlanders themselves are increasingly vocal in the debate over their future. Many support greater economic independence and political autonomy, and local leaders insist that Greenlanders should have the final say over any decisions affecting their land and resources. The U.S. delegation’s visit highlights the need to consult Greenlandic authorities directly, rather than negotiating solely with Denmark. This approach is seen as a step toward more inclusive, respectful diplomacy, which acknowledges Greenland’s status as more than just a strategic asset. The Role of NATO and Transatlantic Relations Trump’s proposals regarding Greenland strained transatlantic relations, raising concerns among NATO members about the reliability of U.S. commitments. The arrival of bipartisan lawmakers in Copenhagen aims to reaffirm NATO solidarity and demonstrate that U.S. policy is consistent with alliance obligations. By engaging Denmark directly, Congress seeks to prevent miscommunication and maintain stability in a region that is increasingly vital for global security. Analysts note that Greenland’s location provides the United States with a critical vantage point for Arctic monitoring and missile defense, making cooperative relations essential. Global Implications The Greenland issue has broader consequences for international geopolitics and Arctic governance. Key points include: Resource security: Greenland’s rare earth minerals are essential for electronics, renewable energy, and defense technologies, making control and access highly strategic. Climate change and navigation: Melting ice is opening new shipping lanes, which could shift global trade patterns and increase competition for influence. Power dynamics in the Arctic: Russia and China have also shown growing interest in the Arctic, prompting the United States and Europe to strengthen alliances and prevent unilateral exploitation. The lawmakers’ visit signals to the international community that the U.S. is committed to diplomatic solutions rather than transactional or coercive strategies. Challenges Ahead Despite the visit’s diplomatic intent, challenges remain: Political polarization in the U.S.: Future administrations may have different approaches to Greenland, raising uncertainty about long-term commitments. Geopolitical competition: Russia and China continue to advance their presence in the Arctic, complicating cooperative efforts. Local autonomy: Greenlandic voices must be prioritized, or any policy may face resistance at the local level. Successfully navigating these challenges will require transparent dialogue, careful planning, and sustained international cooperation. The Path Forward The visit of U.S. lawmakers to Copenhagen is a cautionary and corrective measure. It signals that while Greenland is strategically important, it is not a bargaining chip. Future cooperation will likely focus on: Strengthening Arctic security frameworks Promoting economic development for Greenlanders Maintaining stability in U.S.-European relations Ensuring that Greenlandic voices remain central to decision-making This proactive approach reflects a broader understanding that diplomacy, not unilateral action, is essential in regions of high strategic value. Final Thoughts Greenland has moved from the margins of global attention to the forefront of geopolitical strategy and climate concern. The arrival of U.S. lawmakers in Copenhagen underscores the importance of measured, inclusive diplomacy in the Arctic, contrasting sharply with the impulsive rhetoric that characterized Trump’s Greenland proposals. As nations navigate the Arctic’s emerging opportunities and challenges, Greenland’s sovereignty and the voices of its people will remain central to regional stability, global security, and international cooperation. The lawmakers’ visit represents a step toward rebuilding trust, reinforcing alliances, and charting a sustainable path forward for one of the planet’s most strategically vital territories.
By Muhammad Hassan4 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.