Why Solar Eclipses Are Such a Big Deal!
Know how to preparing for the April 8th Total Solar Eclipse!
The sun is much larger than anything else in the solar system. Earth is lucky because our moon is 400 times smaller than the sun, but it's conveniently 400 times closer to us. This makes the sun and the moon look almost the same size in the sky to us on earth. Occasionally, the moon crosses in front of the sun and blocks its light, creating a solar eclipse. On April 8th, there will be a total solar eclipse passing over where I'll be standing. This is a rare event, as the US won't see another total solar eclipse for 20 years. So, it's a once in a lifetime opportunity to witness this incredible cosmic event. I'll provide all the information you need to fully enjoy the eclipse and learn from it, whether you're a scientist or just curious about the universe. Let's talk about choosing the best spot, what to bring, what to expect before, during, and after the eclipse, and the fascinating things we can learn from such a spectacle.
When the moon's tilted orbit aligns perfectly with Earth's orbital plane, an eclipse occurs. The moon's shadow is cast on our planet during this alignment. There are between two to five solar eclipses on Earth each year. However, any given location on Earth experiences a total eclipse only every few hundred years. So, if you get the chance to witness an eclipse, don't pass it up. Pick a spot in the path of totality, where the moon's shadow completely covers the sun. This path on April 8th runs across North America. Outside this path, the moon will partially cover the sun, but you won't see totality. To maximize your experience, find a location closest to the center line. Use maps and apps available to pick your viewing spot. Check the weather for clear skies during the event. Plan precisely when totality will occur at your location and consider using apps to time key moments of the eclipse. It's incredible that we can predict eclipses, given the complexity of orbital physics. Ancient civilizations couldn't pinpoint solar eclipse occurrences despite their advanced knowledge in mathematics and astronomy.
Predicting the positions of the earth, sun, and moon requires factoring in gravitational tugs from objects in the solar system. This involves solving a complex problem involving over a million bodies in space. Mathematically, the orbits of these celestial bodies are chaotic. In 1715, astronomer Edmund Halley made a prediction about a solar eclipse that was only four minutes off. Today, NASA uses supercomputers to calculate future eclipse timings with precision. Despite technological advancements, precise eclipse predictions can only be made for the next thousand years. It's a problem that cannot be completely solved mathematically. Planning an eclipse viewing down to the second is impressive. Remember to never look directly at the sun, even during an eclipse. Get proper eclipse glasses or make a pinhole camera to safely observe the eclipse. By projecting the sun's image through a tiny hole, you can witness the eclipse without harming your eyes. This simple method is a safe and fun way to experience the eclipse.
Watching an eclipse is fascinating, even if you don't fully understand it. Knowing a little about what to expect can enhance the experience as there's so much to see. The event unfolds quickly, so it's good to plan ahead. Eclipse glasses are crucial for viewing. The solar eclipse timer app can help you track important moments. Colors may dull, and the atmosphere cools as the eclipse progresses. Animals may start behaving strangely. Just before totality, the sun will appear as a thin crescent before darkness sets in. Baily's Beads, named after Francis Baily, are beads of light that flicker along the sun's edge just before totality. The sun's atmosphere, the corona, becomes visible during totality. Shadow bands may be seen on a light surface, a mysterious and faint phenomenon. Totality is when the moon's shadow completely covers the sun, revealing the corona. Bright stars and planets become visible in the sky during totality. Prominences, hot clouds of gas from the sun, can be seen billowing out during totality, a unique and fleeting sight.
When watching a solar eclipse, take a moment to look around you. The moon's shadow creates a dawn-like effect along the horizon, showing sunrise in every direction. As the shadow moves across the sky, the sun will soon reappear. The duration of totality depends on your location. Make sure to know when totality ends to put your eclipse glasses back on. After totality, the sky will brighten in the west and darken in the east. This marks the end of the eclipse as the sun returns. The experience of a total solar eclipse is different for everyone, offering a chance for both wonder and scientific study. Past eclipses have led to significant discoveries, from coronal mass ejections to the existence of the element helium. By observing an eclipse, we gain insights into the mysteries of the universe. Remember to appreciate the rarity of total eclipses and seize the opportunity to witness one whenever possible.
About the Creator
Mariam Fathalrahman
Whether you’re a nature lover, a history buff, or simply someone who enjoys a good read, there’s something here for you, diving into topics as diverse as the mysteries of Earth and nature. Join me, and let’s explore the world together.
Keep reading
More stories from Mariam Fathalrahman and writers in Earth and other communities.
Trump’s Plan to Own the Western Hemisphere and Greenland Is Not What Americans Want
Donald Trump’s foreign policy ambitions have always made headlines, but in early 2026, the conversation took a new turn — one that’s making Americans sit up and take notice. From proposals to dominate the Western Hemisphere to floating ideas about acquiring Greenland, Trump’s rhetoric has been bold, controversial, and, for many, out of step with what the public actually wants. While these ideas might energize parts of the political base, polls and public opinion suggest most Americans are skeptical, even alarmed, about using the military or U.S. influence to expand territory. Let’s break down what’s happening and why the majority of Americans are not on board. The “Don‑roe Doctrine” and a Bold Vision Trump’s team has revived the Monroe Doctrine — the 19th-century policy that told European powers to stay out of the Western Hemisphere — but with a modern twist. Some have jokingly dubbed it the “Don‑roe Doctrine”, emphasizing America’s supposed right to dominate the region and block rivals like China and Russia from gaining influence. In recent statements, Trump and his advisers have stressed that the Western Hemisphere should be under U.S. control, signaling a willingness to increase American power in Latin America. While rooted in history, this rhetoric goes far beyond traditional diplomacy, suggesting active intervention or oversight in neighboring countries’ affairs. Greenland: The Arctic Gambit If dominating the hemisphere wasn’t ambitious enough, Trump has also made headlines with Greenland, the world’s largest island and an autonomous territory of Denmark. Trump has suggested that the U.S. should explore acquiring Greenland, citing strategic national security reasons. The White House went even further, confirming that “a range of options” is on the table — including military involvement if negotiations fail. This statement made global headlines, sparking criticism not just from Denmark but from European leaders across the board. It’s an idea that would have seemed unthinkable a decade ago, and it raises serious questions about international law, diplomacy, and the U.S.’s reputation abroad. Why Americans Aren’t Buying It You might assume bold expansionist rhetoric would excite a nationalist base, but surveys and polls tell a different story. Only about 11% of Americans support purchasing or annexing Greenland. A majority of respondents oppose it outright, including many Republicans. Most Americans prefer a focus on diplomacy, domestic issues, and practical governance, rather than acquiring distant lands. There’s also a strong sense of military fatigue. After decades of overseas interventions, many Americans are wary of costly and risky military actions that may not directly protect U.S. interests. International Pushback Trump’s Greenland idea hasn’t just been controversial domestically — it’s caused outrage abroad. Denmark, the sovereign nation over Greenland, made it clear that the island is not for sale. European leaders have voiced strong support for Greenland’s autonomy and warned that any U.S. attempt to take control could strain alliances, including NATO. Even countries in the Western Hemisphere are cautious. Many Latin American leaders view heavy-handed U.S. influence as unwelcome, highlighting the risks of a foreign policy focused on territorial dominance. The Public Sentiment Gap The contrast between Trump’s ambitions and American public opinion is stark: Sovereignty matters: Most Americans recognize that countries, including Greenland, have the right to self-govern. Military intervention fatigue: There’s little appetite for new foreign conflicts, especially for reasons seen as symbolic or expansionist. Focus on domestic priorities: Healthcare, the economy, education, and infrastructure consistently outrank foreign conquest in Americans’ list of priorities. In short, the public is telling leaders that the future of U.S. influence lies in cooperation, not domination. Why This Matters Trump’s rhetoric has drawn global attention, strained alliances, and created diplomatic tensions. But beyond the headlines, it’s also a reminder of the limits of foreign policy that ignores public opinion. Americans want their leaders focused on practical issues — and most see territorial expansion or hemispheric control as a distraction at best, a liability at worst. The Greenland debate, in particular, highlights the potential clash between ambitious political theater and real-world consequences. While Trump’s ideas make for sensational headlines, they don’t reflect the priorities of everyday Americans. Final Thoughts Donald Trump’s vision of owning the Western Hemisphere and potentially acquiring Greenland is bold — some might even call it audacious. But boldness alone doesn’t win hearts and minds. In fact, Americans are largely rejecting expansionist rhetoric, favoring diplomacy, alliances, and domestic problem-solving over territorial ambition. In a world that is interconnected and wary of unilateral power grabs, the public seems to be sending a clear message: power is important, but consent, cooperation, and practicality matter even more. As Trump continues to push these ideas, he faces the reality that public opinion, international norms, and global diplomacy may be the real limits on his ambitions — not headlines or political theatrics.
By Muhammad Hassan6 days ago in Earth
BRICS Wargames: Why They Matter — And Why India Chose to Sit Out
BRICS — the economic and political bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — has long been seen as a counterweight to Western-dominated global institutions. Over the years, it has expanded its influence in finance, trade, and diplomacy. Yet, in recent times, BRICS has begun exploring another domain that grabs headlines and sparks speculation: military cooperation, including large-scale wargames. These exercises are designed to simulate joint operations, test interoperability, and send a signal of strength. For members like Russia and China, wargames serve as both a show of force and a tool to deepen military collaboration within the bloc. However, India’s decision to opt out of recent BRICS wargames has raised questions: why does this matter, and why is India taking a different path from its BRICS partners? The Rise of BRICS Military Exercises Historically, BRICS has been portrayed as primarily economic, focused on initiatives like the New Development Bank (NDB) and trade agreements aimed at reducing Western dominance. But recent years have seen an evolution. Military drills among BRICS members are increasingly prominent, especially in the context of global tension and regional conflicts. These wargames are about more than just tactical drills. They serve multiple purposes: Strategic signaling: By conducting joint exercises, BRICS countries demonstrate unity and military capability to the rest of the world. Operational readiness: Countries test their ability to coordinate in complex scenarios, from humanitarian missions to potential combat operations. Diplomatic leverage: The exercises send subtle messages to other global powers, indicating that BRICS members can collaborate beyond economic forums. For nations like Russia, recently facing sanctions and international scrutiny, these exercises are particularly important. They showcase the ability to maintain partnerships and project power despite global isolation. For China, it is a way to cement strategic influence in Asia and beyond. Why BRICS Wargames Matter Globally The significance of these exercises extends beyond the bloc itself. Analysts note several key implications: Challenge to NATO and U.S. influence: BRICS wargames signal that alternative power centers exist outside Western-led military alliances. Regional security dynamics: Countries bordering BRICS members, particularly in South Asia, Africa, and Latin America, must monitor these developments carefully. Economic-military linkages: Military coordination among major emerging economies could shape security considerations in trade corridors, energy supply routes, and resource-rich regions. In essence, BRICS wargames are not just about soldiers and tanks, but about the broader geopolitical landscape: signaling, strategy, and shaping perceptions of influence. India’s Calculated Decision to Opt Out While Russia, China, Brazil, and South Africa have shown interest in participating actively, India has strategically chosen to abstain from the most recent wargames. This decision may appear surprising, given India’s economic and political stake in BRICS, but several factors explain it. Geopolitical balancing: India maintains complex relations with both China and Russia. While it has defense and historical ties with Russia, its relationship with China has grown tense due to border disputes and regional competition. Joining a wargame with China could be politically and militarily sensitive. Alignment with Western partnerships: India has strengthened ties with Western-led coalitions, including the Quad (U.S., Japan, Australia, India). Participating in BRICS military drills could conflict with these alliances, potentially sending mixed signals. Strategic autonomy: India has long emphasized a policy of strategic autonomy — making decisions based on national interest rather than bloc pressure. Opting out allows India to maintain flexibility in foreign policy and avoid entanglement in exercises that may not align with its regional objectives. Domestic perception: Indian public opinion and political narratives favor cautious engagement with China and Russia on military matters. Skipping the wargames minimizes domestic criticism of appearing too closely aligned with either of the more assertive BRICS powers. What India Gains by Sitting Out Choosing not to participate does not mean India is disengaged from BRICS. Economically and diplomatically, it remains a key player in the bloc. By skipping the wargames, India can: Maintain regional credibility in South Asia while avoiding the perception of aligning militarily with China. Signal strategic independence, reinforcing its image as a nation that prioritizes national security over bloc politics. Focus on bilateral and multilateral exercises elsewhere, such as those with the U.S., Japan, and Australia, which are more aligned with India’s current security priorities. In short, opting out allows India to navigate the delicate balance between its BRICS commitments and broader global strategic interests. Implications for BRICS and Global Security India’s abstention also reflects broader trends within BRICS: the bloc is not monolithic. While economic cooperation is often strong, military integration faces political and strategic limits. Differing national interests, historical rivalries, and regional tensions prevent uniform alignment. For global observers, this is crucial. It shows that while BRICS wargames are important, they are not necessarily indicative of a fully unified military bloc. The exercises are as much about optics as operations, and India’s absence underscores the challenges of aligning countries with divergent security priorities. Conclusion BRICS wargames matter because they are a window into the bloc’s evolving strategic ambitions. They signal power, test cooperation, and demonstrate emerging global influence. Yet India’s decision to opt out highlights that even within this growing coalition, national interests remain paramount. For India, the choice reflects a calculated approach: engage where it benefits national interest, avoid where risks outweigh gains, and maintain strategic flexibility. For the rest of the world, it is a reminder that BRICS, while increasingly important, is not a military monolith. Ultimately, BRICS wargames are as much about geopolitics and signaling as they are about military maneuvers — and India’s careful stance illustrates how emerging powers navigate this complex global chessboard.Start writing...
By Muhammad Hassana day ago in Earth
Comments (1)
Well detailed analysis