UNIVERSE IS VAST AND EXPANDING
Expanding universe overview
The universe is an incredibly vast and ever-expanding entity, filled with mysteries that continue to captivate scientists and philosophers alike. From the tiniest particles to the largest galaxies, it encompasses everything that exists, spanning billions of light-years in every direction. Our understanding of the universe has evolved over centuries, with each new discovery revealing more about its size, structure, and origins.
At its core, the universe is a vast expanse of space and time, woven together in a fabric that is difficult to fully comprehend. According to the most widely accepted cosmological model, the universe began approximately 13.8 billion years ago with the Big Bang, a colossal explosion that marked the birth of everything we know. This event set into motion the expansion of space, an expansion that continues to this day, driving galaxies apart and creating the large-scale structure of the universe.
The observable universe, which is the portion of the universe that we can see with our current technology, stretches for about 93 billion light-years in diameter. Within this space, there are an estimated two trillion galaxies, each containing millions to billions of stars. These galaxies are not evenly distributed but are clustered together in massive structures called galaxy clusters and superclusters, separated by vast cosmic voids where relatively little matter exists.
One of the most intriguing aspects of the universe is its continuous expansion. This was first observed in the 1920s by American astronomer Edwin Hubble, who discovered that distant galaxies were moving away from us, with their speed proportional to their distance. This observation led to the formulation of Hubble's Law, which states that the universe is expanding uniformly. However, this expansion is not uniform on smaller scales; local gravitational forces can cause galaxies to collide and merge, forming even larger galaxies.
The discovery of dark matter and dark energy has added new layers of complexity to our understanding of the universe. Dark matter is an invisible substance that makes up about 27% of the universe's total mass and energy. It doesn't emit, absorb, or reflect light, making it undetectable by conventional means. However, its presence can be inferred from the gravitational effects it exerts on visible matter, such as galaxies and galaxy clusters. Without dark matter, the observed structure of the universe would not be possible.
Dark energy, on the other hand, is even more mysterious. It is thought to make up about 68% of the universe and is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe. While dark matter works to pull things together through gravity, dark energy drives them apart. The nature of dark energy is one of the biggest questions in modern cosmology, with numerous theories attempting to explain its origin and properties.
The fate of the universe is also a topic of great interest and debate. If the current rate of expansion continues, the universe could eventually reach a state known as the "Big Freeze," where galaxies drift so far apart that stars burn out, and the universe becomes a cold, dark, and empty place. Another possibility is the "Big Rip," where the expansion becomes so rapid that it tears galaxies, stars, and even atoms apart. Alternatively, the universe could experience a "Big Crunch," where the expansion slows down, reverses, and the universe collapses in on itself.
Despite these potential outcomes, the universe as we know it still has billions of years of activity ahead. Stars will continue to form, planets will emerge, and perhaps even life will thrive in corners of the cosmos we have yet to discover. As we explore the universe through telescopes, space probes, and theoretical models, our understanding of its vastness and complexity will continue to grow.
In summary, the universe is a vast and expanding realm, filled with countless galaxies, stars, and cosmic mysteries. Its continuous expansion, driven by forces like dark energy, ensures that it remains a dynamic and ever-changing entity. While we have made significant strides in understanding the universe, much remains unknown, leaving us to wonder what secrets this immense and ancient cosmos still holds.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Sharon Chebet and writers in Earth and other communities.
GRAVITY IN SPACE
The idea that there is "zero gravity" in space is a common misconception, but it's not entirely accurate. Gravity exists everywhere in the universe, including in space. However, the effects of gravity in space differ significantly from those experienced on Earth, leading to the sensation of weightlessness that astronauts often describe.
By Sharon Chebetabout a year ago in Earth
Nitrogen is necessary for young tropical rain forests to combat climate change.
By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in wood, tropical rainforests contribute to the slowing of climate change. Forests that develop quickly are even more important because they absorb carbon more quickly.
By Francis Damiabout 4 hours ago in Earth
DoJ Attorneys Resign Over Decision Not to Investigate Agent in Minneapolis ICE Shooting
A Justice Department Decision Sparks Fallout Several US Department of Justice (DoJ) attorneys have resigned following an internal decision not to pursue a criminal investigation into a federal immigration agent involved in a shooting in Minneapolis, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter. The resignations have intensified scrutiny of the DoJ’s handling of the case and fueled public debate over law enforcement accountability, particularly when federal agents are involved. The shooting, which occurred during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in Minneapolis, has already drawn local outrage and national attention. The decision not to open a formal investigation has now added a new layer of controversy—this time from within the Justice Department itself. What Is Known About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting Details surrounding the incident remain limited, as authorities have not released a full public account. What has been confirmed is that an ICE agent discharged a firearm during an operation, resulting in a civilian being shot. The condition of the victim has not been fully detailed in official statements, though local officials confirmed the individual survived. Local law enforcement initially responded to the scene, but jurisdictional authority shifted quickly due to the involvement of a federal agent. Under standard procedure, incidents involving federal officers are typically reviewed by the DoJ to determine whether a civil rights or criminal investigation is warranted. It was this review—and its outcome—that ultimately triggered internal dissent. Why DoJ Attorneys Walked Away According to sources familiar with the resignations, multiple attorneys—some with experience in civil rights and public integrity cases—objected strongly to the decision not to open a formal investigation. They argued that the shooting met the threshold for independent review, regardless of whether charges were ultimately brought. One former official described the decision as “a dangerous precedent,” warning that declining to investigate could erode public trust. Others reportedly felt that political considerations, rather than legal standards, influenced the outcome. While the DoJ has not publicly confirmed the number of resignations, officials acknowledged that departures occurred and said they were handled in accordance with internal procedures. The Justice Department’s Position In a brief statement, the Department of Justice said it had conducted an initial assessment of the incident and concluded that there was insufficient basis to proceed with a criminal investigation at this time. Officials emphasized that such decisions are made after reviewing available evidence, including use-of-force policies and witness statements. The department rejected claims that the decision was politically motivated, insisting that prosecutors follow established legal thresholds rather than public pressure. However, the DoJ declined to provide further details, citing the sensitive nature of law enforcement operations and personnel matters. Minneapolis Officials and Community Reaction In Minneapolis, the reaction has been swift and critical. City leaders and community advocates have called for greater transparency, arguing that federal agents operating within city limits should be subject to the same level of scrutiny as local police. “This isn’t about politics—it’s about accountability,” said a local civil rights advocate. “When someone is shot, there must be an independent investigation, regardless of the badge involved.” Protests and community meetings have followed, with residents demanding the release of body camera footage, operational details, and a clearer explanation for the DoJ’s decision. ICE Operations Under Renewed Scrutiny The shooting and subsequent fallout have reignited broader concerns about ICE enforcement tactics. Critics argue that immigration operations often take place with limited oversight, creating conditions where accountability gaps can emerge. Advocacy groups note that ICE agents are armed and authorized to use force, yet incidents involving shootings are relatively rare—and therefore require especially careful review when they occur. Supporters of ICE counter that agents operate in dangerous environments and must make split-second decisions, warning against rushing to judgment without full facts. Political Pressure and the Rule of Law The resignations have also raised questions about political pressure within federal law enforcement agencies. While no direct evidence has been made public, former prosecutors say internal disagreement of this magnitude is unusual and concerning. “When career attorneys resign over a single decision, it signals a serious breakdown of trust,” said a former federal prosecutor. “That doesn’t happen lightly.” Lawmakers from both parties have begun asking questions, with some calling for congressional oversight hearings into the incident and the DoJ’s decision-making process. Legal Standards vs Public Expectations At the heart of the controversy is a long-standing tension in US justice: the gap between legal thresholds for prosecution and public expectations of accountability. Opening an investigation does not imply guilt, but declining to investigate can be perceived as preemptively closing the door on transparency. Civil rights experts argue that even if prosecutors believe charges are unlikely, a formal investigation can still serve an important public interest. “The process matters as much as the outcome,” said one legal scholar. “Especially when federal authority is involved.” What Happens Next While the DoJ has indicated it will not revisit its decision at this time, pressure is mounting. Civil lawsuits, independent reviews, or congressional inquiries could still follow. Meanwhile, the resignations themselves may become part of a broader reckoning inside the Justice Department, as leaders assess how internal dissent is handled—and how public confidence can be restored. For the attorneys who resigned, the decision appears to have been a matter of principle. For the public, the unanswered questions surrounding the Minneapolis shooting remain unresolved. Conclusion: A Case That Won’t Fade Quietly The resignations of DoJ attorneys over the decision not to investigate an ICE agent involved in a Minneapolis shooting have turned a single law enforcement incident into a national flashpoint. Beyond the specifics of the case, the episode raises fundamental questions about accountability, transparency, and the independence of the justice system. Whether through further investigation, legal action, or political oversight, the issue is unlikely to disappear—and the consequences may shape how similar cases are handled in the future.
By Aarif Lashari2 days ago in Earth
Comments (1)
Yes. We are living in a marvellous environment.