Two major regrets that have been rumored in the history of science
Do you know the story of Tesla and Thackeray?
The history of science has been rumored to have two major regrets, one is that after Tesla's death the U.S. military organized a large amount of research information as top secret information not to be disclosed, because Tesla has developed a vehicle using electromagnetic power, and the exploration of the electromagnetic field has reached the level of insight into the skin layer of the solar system!
The other is John Thackeray. The other is John Sealer in the 1960s invented the Sealer effect generator, which has the power to create the flying machine, its flight performance is much higher than the modern aerodynamic effect of aircraft, but by the unanimous suppression of the scientific community, until now still can not be promoted!
Why these advanced technologies have not been promoted
Nikolai Tesla has numerous patents in his life, the most famous of which is his design of the modern alternating current system, in addition to radio communication and wireless power transmission technology, as well as his invention of the ghost radio and detection of the solar system shell layer technology, it is said that the last technology even discovered the existence of several shell layers of the solar system, the universe seen by humans are given through the solar system and the galactic shell layer telescope. and human vehicles can not even pass through the first shell layer, that is, humans can not fly out of the solar system!
The fact that its discovery was too far ahead of its time and shocking because, in the 1930s and 1940s, Pluto was just discovered, for the solar system boundary this theory does not even exist yet, and Tesla's discovery has been disclosed on the shelf because it is not what the scientific community wants!
Even Tesla also used the plasma cathode discharge tube by rotating the plasma to generate a rotating magnetic field to obtain the anti-gravity effect thus creating an anti-gravity vehicle, that is, the rumored Tesla flying saucer manufacturing method, World War II, Dr. W.O Schumann invented Schumann Levitate (SM-Levitate) (Nazi clock) is also a cathode discharge tube by rotating plasma to generate a rotating magnetic field and thus obtain an anti-gravity effect!
Thackeray effect generator and anti-gravity vehicle
The Thackeray effect and the Thackeray effect vehicle took a different path. In 1946, John Thackeray built the first Thackeray effect generator, which does not require any energy input, but directly starts and outputs electricity by itself.
The device is composed of three rings arranged in concentric circles, each ring is composed of four different materials, and these four materials are also in concentric circles close to each other. The three rings are fixed on a base, and surrounding each ring are rollers that can rotate freely around them, generally 12 rollers in the innermost ring, 22 in the middle one, and 32 in the outermost one. The periphery of the drums are coils, connected to different configurations of structures that can supply AC or DC power.
Its principle is described on Thatcher's website as follows, the author is a little confused, about which of the big guys knows the Thackeray effect to explain.
When the drum of the generator is very close to the ring, the resonant magnetic field of the Thackeray effect will cause the negative ions and electrons in the surrounding environment to be sucked into the machine and accelerated in it. This process is facilitated by the high attraction of neodymium, a rare earth group metal element, to electrons.
It is said that after the Thackeray effect generator was started, the Thackeray generator flew straight up to the ceiling due to the lack of speed control, which led John Thackeray to discover the Thackeray generator anti-gravity effect, so Thackeray began to research anti-gravity vehicles powered by this generator!
According to a website promoting the Thackeray effect generator, Thackeray completed testing of this vehicle in 1965, named IV (Inverse Gravity Vehicles), which could reach Japan from the UK in half an hour, reaching a speed of 19,000 km/h!
And since John Sealer publicized this free access to energy and anti-gravity engine has been suppressed by the scientific community, because it is popularized that almost no longer need the so-called electricity, every household can generate their electricity and is self-sufficient, while the flying machine was completely resisted!
However, it is said that the Thackeray effect generator has received investment from a mysterious rich woman from China, Carla, but it still has not been widely promoted, and only exists among the Thackeray effect enthusiasts!
Carla on the left, John Thackeray on the bottom right, and Morris on the right
Do Tesla's technology and Thatcher's generator and flying machine exist or not?
The planters do not want to shatter your dreams, and Tesla did create a wireless power transmission technology, the technical theory is no problem, and created a "ghost radio", the legendary one-way communication with the ghost of the device, there is even a public design circuit!
Tesla has been struggling with their efforts, but their investment strategy and personality led him to poverty in his later years, which is a pity, but Tesla lived 87 years old, even more than his nemesis Edison to live 3 years, so he died young does not meet, is also considered the end of life it!
But Tesla never self-labeled the discovery of the solar system shell layer, nor has confirmed the need to use electromagnetic resonance technology to break through the shell layer, of course, the principle of the Tesla flying saucer to have, but the biggest possibility is only to produce ionic wind, the modern floating lift is the principle, for the time being, not too big use!
About the crust layer we use a very simple reason to understand, it is said that the solar system's crust layer is located on the outskirts of Pluto, about 8 billion kilometres above, then Tesla how sense this area? 8 billion kilometres of electromagnetic waves need 7.4 hours to reach, it takes 14.8 hours round trip, and at this time the electromagnetic echo reaches the Earth when Tesla's location has turned 2/3 of a turn (Earth), so if he was in the United States, there needs to be a large parabolic antenna located in the United Kingdom to receive this signal! Otherwise, he would have missed the signal!
Did Tesla do this experiment? How did he know about this skin layer? Even if we are clouded by electromagnetic resonance technology, this electromagnetic wave speed of 300,000 km / s must comply with it!
NASA's early solar system schematic is the earliest source of the crust layer
Thackeray effect of the generator exists?
I'm sorry to say that the seed flower family really can not see the principle of the Thur motor but very interested in its flight to the United Kingdom in half an hour, up to 19,000 kilometres per hour is very interested in such an excellent vehicle is not tapped out, still manufacturing a large number of high energy-consuming aircraft, countries are still hundreds of billions of investment in the development of new rockets, is this a matter of a sentence of the scientific community to suppress can be solved?
Maybe it will be a threat to the energy giants, but it can go into space without difficulty, and the countries that are chipping away at launching satellites and attacking their enemies across continents, won't they be moved? Can countries like Iran and North Korea, for example, really withstand the lure of such a vehicle?
Iran has been sticking with the classic 1970s warplane F14
Perhaps the Thur effect has value worth studying, but will never be like that anti-gravity that is now rumored, something that goes against scientific common sense, or less confusion is better, do not waste your youth on this technology that does not see the future.
What are other inventions that have been rumored to be fabulous?
In addition to Tesla and Thur, there was once cold fusion was also popular for a while, such as a sun as well as the hydrogen bomb, the result of hydrogen fusion, but the normal state of fusion requires ultra-high temperature or ultra-high pressure, but when the man replaces the electron in the atom, cold fusion is easy to produce!
But the problem is that it takes 10 Ge of energy to make a mun, and a single fusion can only produce 1.7 Ge, but a man can be catalyzed 100 times, so it seems profitable, doesn't it? But the problem is that when fusion occurs with helium three, there is the problem of binding to helium three and not being able to react, and it is not self-sustaining! Some scientists once announced that they could achieve cold fusion using a petrochemical process, but it's a process that can't be reproduced!
So after that fewer and fewer scientists studied cold fusion, and eventually, cold fusion was marginalized, and if it could produce huge amounts of energy, I guess only a fool would not want this technology!
Perpetual motion machine is also a kind of free energy, often claimed to have created a perpetual motion machine, but in the conservation of energy as well as the law of entropy increase, destined to this perpetual motion machine is not achievable, perpetual motion machine has two types.
The first type of perpetual motion machine outputs energy without inputting it from the outside world.
the second type of perpetual motion machine is to output energy by inputting energy from the outside world.
But modern science recognizes that it is impossible to create either a type one or type two perpetual motion machine! So does the Thackeray effect generator use vacuum energy or zero-point energy? Interested big brothers can leave comments to discuss!
About the Creator
Sukkning
Science will give mankind's greatest gift is？ Is to make the power of humans believe that truth。
US Lawmakers Arrive in Copenhagen to Counter Trump’s Greenland Threats
In a high-stakes diplomatic maneuver, a delegation of U.S. lawmakers recently arrived in Copenhagen to discuss Greenland’s future, aiming to counteract the aggressive rhetoric and territorial ambitions expressed by former President Donald Trump. The visit comes amid rising concerns over Greenland’s strategic importance in the Arctic and the implications of any unilateral moves by the United States. For Denmark, Greenland’s autonomous territory, the presence of U.S. lawmakers underscores both Washington’s interest in Arctic security and the need to maintain strong transatlantic ties. For the United States, the visit signals a delicate recalibration of policy following Trump’s controversial proposals regarding Greenland, including his infamous attempt to buy the island outright during his presidency. Why Greenland Matters Geopolitically Greenland is more than a frozen expanse of ice; it is a geopolitical prize. Strategically located between North America and Europe, Greenland is key to: Arctic shipping routes that are becoming increasingly navigable due to melting ice Natural resources, including rare earth minerals, oil, and gas reserves Military and surveillance installations, notably the Thule Air Base, which is critical to U.S. missile warning systems and space surveillance The Arctic region is warming faster than any other part of the planet, making Greenland both a resource hub and a potential flashpoint for international competition. Trump’s proposals had alarmed Denmark and other NATO allies, raising questions about the United States’ long-term commitment to respecting international norms and allied sovereignty. The Lawmakers’ Mission The delegation, composed of senators and representatives from both political parties, is tasked with: Reassuring Denmark that the U.S. government respects Greenland’s autonomy Discussing security cooperation, particularly regarding Arctic defense and NATO commitments Exploring economic partnerships that benefit Greenland while maintaining regional stability Officials emphasize that this visit is not about reversing Trump’s statements retroactively, but about ensuring that future U.S. policy reflects diplomatic consensus rather than unilateral ambition. Denmark’s Response Denmark has maintained a firm stance on Greenland’s sovereignty, consistently stating that the island is not for sale. Danish leaders have welcomed the U.S. delegation as a positive step toward strengthening trust and clarifying intentions. Copenhagen also hopes to use the opportunity to reinforce cooperative approaches to Arctic security, particularly in light of growing Russian and Chinese interest in the region. For Denmark, maintaining strong relations with the United States — while safeguarding Greenland’s autonomy — is a balancing act that requires careful diplomacy. Greenland’s Perspective Greenlanders themselves are increasingly vocal in the debate over their future. Many support greater economic independence and political autonomy, and local leaders insist that Greenlanders should have the final say over any decisions affecting their land and resources. The U.S. delegation’s visit highlights the need to consult Greenlandic authorities directly, rather than negotiating solely with Denmark. This approach is seen as a step toward more inclusive, respectful diplomacy, which acknowledges Greenland’s status as more than just a strategic asset. The Role of NATO and Transatlantic Relations Trump’s proposals regarding Greenland strained transatlantic relations, raising concerns among NATO members about the reliability of U.S. commitments. The arrival of bipartisan lawmakers in Copenhagen aims to reaffirm NATO solidarity and demonstrate that U.S. policy is consistent with alliance obligations. By engaging Denmark directly, Congress seeks to prevent miscommunication and maintain stability in a region that is increasingly vital for global security. Analysts note that Greenland’s location provides the United States with a critical vantage point for Arctic monitoring and missile defense, making cooperative relations essential. Global Implications The Greenland issue has broader consequences for international geopolitics and Arctic governance. Key points include: Resource security: Greenland’s rare earth minerals are essential for electronics, renewable energy, and defense technologies, making control and access highly strategic. Climate change and navigation: Melting ice is opening new shipping lanes, which could shift global trade patterns and increase competition for influence. Power dynamics in the Arctic: Russia and China have also shown growing interest in the Arctic, prompting the United States and Europe to strengthen alliances and prevent unilateral exploitation. The lawmakers’ visit signals to the international community that the U.S. is committed to diplomatic solutions rather than transactional or coercive strategies. Challenges Ahead Despite the visit’s diplomatic intent, challenges remain: Political polarization in the U.S.: Future administrations may have different approaches to Greenland, raising uncertainty about long-term commitments. Geopolitical competition: Russia and China continue to advance their presence in the Arctic, complicating cooperative efforts. Local autonomy: Greenlandic voices must be prioritized, or any policy may face resistance at the local level. Successfully navigating these challenges will require transparent dialogue, careful planning, and sustained international cooperation. The Path Forward The visit of U.S. lawmakers to Copenhagen is a cautionary and corrective measure. It signals that while Greenland is strategically important, it is not a bargaining chip. Future cooperation will likely focus on: Strengthening Arctic security frameworks Promoting economic development for Greenlanders Maintaining stability in U.S.-European relations Ensuring that Greenlandic voices remain central to decision-making This proactive approach reflects a broader understanding that diplomacy, not unilateral action, is essential in regions of high strategic value. Final Thoughts Greenland has moved from the margins of global attention to the forefront of geopolitical strategy and climate concern. The arrival of U.S. lawmakers in Copenhagen underscores the importance of measured, inclusive diplomacy in the Arctic, contrasting sharply with the impulsive rhetoric that characterized Trump’s Greenland proposals. As nations navigate the Arctic’s emerging opportunities and challenges, Greenland’s sovereignty and the voices of its people will remain central to regional stability, global security, and international cooperation. The lawmakers’ visit represents a step toward rebuilding trust, reinforcing alliances, and charting a sustainable path forward for one of the planet’s most strategically vital territories.
By Muhammad Hassan2 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.