The Arctic once completely melted under a moderate environment is revealed in a hidden cave in Greenland.
Greenland used to be warm.
The Arctic wasn't always dead and cold. Parts of northern Greenland were green, wet, and teeming with flowing water millions of years ago. Evidence of that lost warmth can now be found in a tunnel beneath its current ice.
Scientists at the University of Innsbruck discovered hints in mineral deposit layers that have completely changed our understanding of the history of the Arctic.
According to the study, the area used to go for extended periods of time without permafrost. The finding demonstrates how swiftly rising temperatures can affect this frigid planet.
According to Gina Moseley, the lead author of the study, "these deposits are like tiny time capsules." "They demonstrate that northern Greenland was formerly much wetter and free of permafrost."
Greenland used to be warm.
Only small aircraft and a strenuous walk through unspoiled nature can reach Cove Cave, which is located on Greenland's isolated northern shore.
The investigators discovered calcite deposits created by water soaking within. The existence of these minerals indicates that Greenland's Arctic previously melted sufficiently for liquid water to flow underground because they cannot develop in frozen ground.
These formations date between 9.5 and 5.3 million years ago, according to the scientists. Carbon dioxide levels were just above 310 parts per million during this period, and air temperatures were at least 55°F (13°C) higher than they are now.
The temperature at the ocean's surface also increased by a few degrees. Greenland used to pulse with warmth and wetness, but it is now covered in ice.
Greenland was chilled by the Arctic
The tale of the cave is not one of perpetual summer. When permafrost reappeared and water flow ceased, there were colder gaps between the warm stages.
Glacial debris entered the cave system between 6.3 and 5.6 million years ago, indicating brief times when ice moved across the terrain. Like pages in a diary, the minerals document these transitions, with each layer displaying a change from frozen immobility.
Similar patterns can be seen in ocean records from the same time period. The earth froze again when sea temperatures dropped. The cave came back to life when the oceans warmed up.
Global ocean currents that move heat northward and southward are linked to Greenland's land temperature. According to Moseley, "we can see from this that the climate reacted strongly and rapidly to changing boundary conditions."
Extreme carbon dioxide levels were not necessary for Greenland to melt. Its surroundings were altered by even modest increases.
The Arctic was formed by patterns of sunlight
These prehistoric climate fluctuations had regular rhythms. Sunlight reaching the poles was altered by the planet's orbit and tilt. Sunlight intensified during specific orbital alignments, warming Greenland's soil and causing permafrost to thaw. At other times, cold phases were favoured by less intense sunlight.
An odd event occurred between 9.6 and 9.3 million years ago: Antarctica cooled and the Arctic warmed. Afterwards, both poles started to move in unison once more.
The group proposes that vegetation was involved. Darker canopies absorbed more heat when the Arctic was covered in dense woods. The ground reflected sunlight and cooled more quickly as trees gave way to shrubs and tundra.
A domino effect resulted from this conflict between light and land cover. Warmth increased evaporation and cloud cover, which trapped moisture. Ice formed as a result of the surface becoming pale and reflecting due to additional cooling.
The oxygen isotope data from the cave traces these shifts in remarkable detail, demonstrating how effortlessly the Arctic transitioned from thawed to frozen.
The Greenland Cave's Chemistry
Even the mineral chemistry within Cove Cave conveys a narrative. Following each cold episode, the team discovered abrupt increases in silicate concentrations.
These indications were probably caused by glacial erosion, which melt water brought into the cave when the ice receded. The transition of Greenland's surface from ice to soil was indicated by each chemical signature.
The results are consistent with computer simulations that indicate glaciers in northern Greenland experienced fast growth and shrinkage during the Late Miocene.
The ice moved quickly, melting, and then reappearing in time with Earth's orbit. The data from the cave links regional variations in permafrost to changes in sea ice and carbon dioxide levels worldwide.
Teachings for the Arctic and Greenland
Something disturbing is brought to light by Moseley and her team. There doesn't seem to be much of a difference between the conditions that melted Greenland millions of years ago and those that exist today.
When carbon dioxide levels rose above 310 parts per million back then, permafrost disappeared. They are more than 420 ppm today.
According to Moseley, "the Arctic has never been a stable system." "It demonstrates the region's dynamic nature and the speed at which environmental conditions can shift."
The Arctic today is especially susceptible because of this similar vulnerability. There are already indications that current warming is approaching the same threshold. Widespread thawing might release enormous reserves of carbon and methane locked in frozen ground if temperatures climb by a few degrees.
Warmth in the past, danger in the future
According to Moseley, "Our results show how sensitive the Arctic climate is and that every fraction of a degree matters." The cave's lesson is very clear: even minor adjustments can have far-reaching effects.
The geography of Greenland was altered by warming back then. It has the potential to change the future of our world. She continued, "Every tiny action we take to limit warming helps to avoid these feedback and to reduce the impacts of climate change."
Beneath Greenland's Arctic ice, those old calcite layers are more than just artefacts. They serve as a reminder that melting is possible even in the coldest regions of the planet.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Francis Dami and writers in Earth and other communities.
The climate of Earth is shaped by the buried carbon carried by rivers.
Stories of land and life are carried by every river. It carries dissolved organic matter—bits of carbon from soil, plants, and human activity—into the sea. This material was followed by scientists from China's Nanjing Institute of Environment Sciences and the Institute of Science Tokyo through three rivers that met the Yellow Sea.
By Francis Dami3 months ago in Earth
“Are You Dead?”: A New App Reflects the Loneliness of Young Chinese Living Alone
In China’s rapidly changing cities, living alone is no longer unusual—especially among young adults pursuing education, careers, and independence. But as solo living increases, so do concerns about isolation, safety, and what happens when no one is around to check in. Against this backdrop, a new app with a blunt, unsettling question—“Are you dead?”—has captured public attention and ignited debate. Despite its shocking name, the app is not designed to provoke fear. Instead, it aims to address a practical and emotional gap in modern urban life: how to ensure the well-being of people who live alone, and how technology is stepping in where traditional community networks have weakened. The Rise of Solo Living in China China has witnessed a dramatic shift in household structures over the past two decades. Urbanization, delayed marriage, rising housing costs, and changing cultural values have contributed to a growing number of single-person households, particularly among people in their 20s and 30s. For many young Chinese professionals, living alone represents freedom and self-reliance. It allows flexibility, privacy, and independence from family expectations. Yet this independence often comes with trade-offs: fewer daily social interactions, weaker neighborhood ties, and limited support in emergencies. In megacities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen, it is increasingly common for neighbors not to know each other at all. In this environment, concerns about what happens if someone becomes ill, injured, or simply disappears from daily routines have become more pronounced. What the App Actually Does Despite its provocative name, the app’s purpose is surprisingly simple. It functions as a digital check-in system. Users set regular times to confirm they are okay—by tapping a notification or completing a brief check-in. If the user fails to respond after a certain period, the app automatically alerts designated contacts, such as friends, family members, or emergency responders. The stark question, “Are you dead?”, is intentionally designed to grab attention and prompt action. Developers argue that softer language is often ignored, while blunt phrasing cuts through digital noise and encourages consistent use. In essence, the app acts as a safety net, especially for people who live alone and may not have daily contact with others. Why Young People Are Downloading It The app’s popularity reflects deeper anxieties among young adults navigating modern life. Many users say they downloaded it not because they fear the worst every day, but because it provides peace of mind—both for themselves and for loved ones. For parents living far from their children, the app offers reassurance without constant phone calls. For users, it creates a sense of being quietly watched over, without sacrificing independence. Some users have also described the app as a form of emotional comfort. Even a routine notification can feel like a reminder that someone, somewhere, would notice if they vanished from daily life. A Name That Sparked Debate The app’s name has been its most controversial feature. Critics argue that the phrase “Are you dead?” is unnecessarily harsh and reflects a growing desensitization in digital culture. Others worry that such language could amplify anxiety rather than reduce it. Supporters, however, see the name as a reflection of reality rather than a provocation. In densely populated cities where people can go unnoticed for days or weeks, the question is uncomfortable—but relevant. They argue that avoiding blunt language does not eliminate the underlying problem of isolation. The debate highlights a broader tension in tech design: Should apps prioritize emotional sensitivity, or practical effectiveness—even if it makes people uncomfortable? Technology Filling a Social Gap The rise of this app points to a larger issue: technology increasingly compensates for weakened social structures. In the past, extended families, close-knit neighborhoods, and workplace communities naturally checked in on individuals. Today, those informal safety nets are often absent. Apps like this one are not just tools; they are symptoms of a society where digital solutions are replacing human presence. While convenient, this raises questions about whether technology is addressing the root causes of loneliness—or simply managing its consequences. Still, for many users, the app is not a replacement for relationships, but a supplement to modern life realities. Living Alone Does Not Mean Wanting to Be Alone An important takeaway from the app’s success is that living alone is not the same as wanting isolation. Many young Chinese adults value independence but still crave connection, security, and acknowledgment. The app’s routine check-ins, though minimal, provide a structured moment of contact. In a fast-paced, high-pressure environment, even small gestures of recognition can matter. This trend also reflects changing attitudes toward mental well-being and personal safety. Younger generations are more open to discussing vulnerability and using tools that previous generations might have dismissed. What This Says About Modern Urban Life The popularity of an app that asks such a stark question speaks volumes about the realities of contemporary urban living—not just in China, but globally. As cities grow larger and lives become more individualized, people are searching for new ways to ensure they are seen, remembered, and protected. The app’s success suggests that people are willing to engage with uncomfortable ideas if they address real needs. It also underscores the importance of designing technology that is honest about modern challenges, rather than masking them with euphemisms. Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call, Not a Warning While the phrase “Are you dead?” may sound alarming, the app behind it is less about fear and more about care. It reflects a generation navigating independence in a world where traditional support systems no longer function as they once did. Rather than signaling a morbid obsession, the app serves as a quiet reminder of something deeply human: the need to be noticed. In that sense, its blunt question is not about death at all—but about presence, connection, and the reassurance that someone would check if you were gone. As solo living continues to rise, tools like this app may become less shocking and more commonplace—symbols of how society adapts to changing ways of life in the digital age.
By Muhammad Hassan4 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.