PYRAMID OF GIZA
Amazing Facts And New Knowledge About PYRAMID OF GIZA
Certainly! The Pyramid of Giza is one of the most fascinating and mysterious ancient structures in the world. It has been a topic of fascination for centuries and continues to intrigue historians, archeologists, and tourists to this day. In this article, we'll explore the history of the Pyramid of Giza, its main discoveries, the kings buried in it, and some of the most popular conspiracy theories surrounding the ancient monument.
Discovery of the Pyramid of Giza:
The Pyramid of Giza is located in Giza, Egypt, on the west bank of the Nile River. It is the oldest and largest of the three pyramids in the Giza pyramid complex, and it is the only one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World that still exists today. The Pyramid of Giza was built during the Old Kingdom period of ancient Egypt, between 2580 BCE and 2560 BCE, during the reign of Pharaoh Khufu. It is believed to have taken approximately 20 years to construct.
The Pyramid of Giza was first discovered by Europeans in the 9th century AD, when an Arab geographer named Abu al-Salt reported seeing a large, ancient structure in the area. However, the structure was not identified as a pyramid until the 12th century AD, when the Arab historian Abd al-Latif al-Baghdadi visited the site and described it as a "square mountain."
In 1798, French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte sent a group of scholars and scientists to Egypt to study the country's ancient ruins, including the Pyramid of Giza. This expedition marked the beginning of modern archeological studies of the pyramid.
Main Discoveries in the Pyramid of Giza:
Over the years, numerous discoveries have been made within the Pyramid of Giza, shedding light on the ancient Egyptian civilization and their burial practices. Some of the most significant discoveries are:
The Burial Chamber:
The burial chamber is located deep within the pyramid, and it is where the king's body was placed after mummification. The chamber is made of granite and features a sarcophagus in the center. The sarcophagus was initially thought to be made of solid gold, but it was later discovered to be made of basalt. The burial chamber was discovered by British archeologist Howard Carter in 1925.
The Grand Gallery:
The Grand Gallery is a long, sloping corridor that leads to the burial chamber. It is approximately 28 feet high and 150 feet long, and it is made of polished limestone. The walls of the Grand Gallery are adorned with intricate carvings and hieroglyphics.
The Descending Passage:
The Descending Passage is a narrow, steep corridor that leads from the entrance of the pyramid to the Subterranean Chamber. It is approximately 345 feet long and only 3 feet wide.
The Ascending Passage:
The Ascending Passage is a steep, narrow corridor that leads from the Subterranean Chamber to the Grand Gallery. It is approximately 129 feet long and only 3 feet wide.
The Subterranean Chamber:
The Subterranean Chamber is located beneath the pyramid, and it is believed to have been an unfinished burial chamber. It is approximately 46 feet long and 27 feet wide.
The Queen's Chamber:
The Queen's Chamber is located in the middle of the pyramid, above the Subterranean Chamber. It is approximately 20 feet long and 17 feet wide, and it is believed to have been a symbolic burial chamber for the queen.
The Air Shafts:
The Pyramid of Giza features four air shafts, two on the north side and two on the south side. The air shafts were designed to provide ventilation to the burial chamber.Discovery of the Pyramid of Giza
The Pyramid of Giza was built during the Old Kingdom period of ancient Egypt, around 4,500 years ago. The pyramid was constructed as a tomb for the Pharaoh Khufu, who ruled Egypt from around 2589 BC to 2566 BC. The construction of the pyramid was a monumental task that required the labor of thousands of workers over a period of more than 20 years.
The Pyramid of Giza was first discovered by Arab historians in the 9th century AD. The pyramid was then described by the Arab historian and geographer Ibn Abd al-Hakam in his book Futuh Misr wa'l-Maghrib wa'l-Andalus (Conquest of Egypt, North Africa, and Spain). However, the first recorded visit to the pyramid was made by the Arab traveler Al-Maqrizi in the 15th century. He reported that the pyramid was already in a state of disrepair and had been looted for centuries.
In the 17th century, the pyramid was rediscovered by European travelers who came to Egypt to explore its ancient ruins. The first recorded European to visit the Pyramid of Giza was John Greaves, an English mathematician who visited Egypt in 1638. He measured the pyramid and made the first accurate drawing of its interior. Other European travelers followed, including Frenchman Jean-Pierre Lepsius, who made the first detailed plan of the pyramid in 1837.
Exploration of the Pyramid of Giza
The exploration of the Pyramid of Giza began in earnest in the 19th century, when European archaeologists began to excavate the site. The first major excavation was carried out by British archaeologist Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie in the late 19th century. Petrie was one of the first archaeologists to use scientific methods in his work, and he made many important discoveries at the pyramid.
Petrie's excavations revealed that the pyramid was constructed using a complex system of ramps and pulleys. He also discovered a network of underground chambers and tunnels beneath the pyramid, including the King's Chamber, the Queen's Chamber, and a series of passageways and shafts. Petrie's work laid the foundation for future research at the pyramid and established the site as one of the most important archaeological sites in the world.
Main discoveries within the Pyramid of Giza
The Pyramid of Giza is an enormous structure, standing over 480 feet tall and covering an area of around 13 acres. Over the years, many important discoveries have been made within the pyramid, shedding light on the lives and beliefs of the ancient Egyptians.
King's Chamber
The King's Chamber is the most famous and impressive chamber within the Pyramid of Giza. This chamber is located near the top of the pyramid and is accessible via a series of steeply sloping passages. The chamber is made of solid granite and contains the sarcophagus of Pharaoh Khufu. The chamber is also home to a number of other interesting features, including air shafts that lead to the exterior of the pyramid.
Queen's Chamber
The Queen's Chamber is another important chamber within the Pyramid of Giza. This chamber is located beneath.
About the Creator
Taimoor Khan
Here you can find JOURNALS, ARTICLES AND ESSAYS on different topics.
Keep reading
More stories from Taimoor Khan and writers in Earth and other communities.
Transforming the Careless Attitude of Men towards Nature: A Call for Mindful Stewardship
Introduction: The relationship between humans and nature is a delicate balance that has existed since the dawn of civilization. Throughout history, humans have depended on nature for sustenance, shelter, and inspiration. However, as modern society has progressed, there has been an alarming trend of careless attitudes towards nature, particularly among men. This disregard for the environment has led to devastating consequences, including deforestation, pollution, climate change, and the extinction of species. In this article, we will delve into the various ways in which men have displayed a reckless attitude towards nature, examining the causes and impacts of this behavior, and proposing solutions to address the pressing environmental challenges we face today.
By Taimoor Khan3 years ago in Earth
Storm Goretti Wreaks Havoc Across the UK — As It Happened
The United Kingdom faced one of its most disruptive winter storms in recent years as Storm Goretti swept across the nation, bringing heavy rain, strong winds, and freezing conditions. From northern Scotland to southern England, communities grappled with transport chaos, power outages, and warnings from authorities urging people to stay indoors. Here’s a detailed look at the storm’s impact as it unfolded.
By Fiaz Ahmed 6 days ago in Earth
Inside Trump's $11 Billion Health Plan to Replace “Neo-Colonial” USAID
In the landscape of global health aid, few proposals have stirred as much debate as former President Donald Trump’s ambitious plan to restructure American assistance abroad. Dubbed an $11 billion health initiative aimed at replacing USAID’s current framework, the plan seeks to pivot away from what Trump and his allies have criticized as the “neo-colonial” approach of U.S. foreign aid. While the plan promises greater efficiency and impact, experts are split on whether it is a practical solution or a politically driven gamble. Trump’s Critique of USAID The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a central pillar of American foreign assistance, distributing billions in aid annually to address health crises, food insecurity, and development challenges worldwide. However, Trump’s administration and its supporters have often described USAID’s approach as bureaucratic, inefficient, and reflective of a “neo-colonial” mindset. In public statements, Trump argued that the U.S. was spending taxpayer dollars on programs that benefited foreign governments or contractors more than the intended local communities. Critics of the plan say that while USAID has flaws—as any large bureaucracy does—its extensive networks and decades of experience provide an unmatched capacity to deliver aid efficiently and safely. The Core of the $11 Billion Proposal At the heart of Trump’s proposal is an $11 billion fund designed to consolidate, modernize, and streamline U.S. health aid. Unlike the traditional USAID model, which relies heavily on long-term partnerships with governments and NGOs, the new plan emphasizes: Direct Impact Funding: Allocating resources to frontline health workers and local initiatives rather than intermediaries. Data-Driven Investments: Using real-time health data to target outbreaks and crises more efficiently. Private Sector Partnerships: Leveraging U.S. pharmaceutical companies, tech firms, and healthcare startups to deliver vaccines, treatments, and medical infrastructure. Shorter Program Cycles: Moving away from multi-year funding commitments in favor of more flexible, results-oriented programs. Proponents argue that this approach could reduce bureaucratic overhead and ensure U.S. aid reaches communities faster. By “cutting out the middlemen,” Trump supporters claim, America can avoid the pitfalls of slow-moving aid programs that sometimes fail to adapt to crises. Reactions from the Global Health Community Global health experts, however, have expressed concern about both the logistics and philosophy of the plan. Dr. Melissa Ortega, a senior researcher at the Global Health Policy Institute, explained, “The idea of bypassing established structures like USAID may sound appealing on paper, but in practice, it risks undermining decades of institutional knowledge. Health systems are complex, and short-term projects cannot replace long-term capacity building.” Some critics have also questioned the characterization of USAID as “neo-colonial.” While U.S. foreign aid has historically been tied to geopolitical interests, many programs today are designed collaboratively with recipient countries and local organizations. Reducing oversight could unintentionally increase the risk of misuse, corruption, or health inequities. On the other hand, supporters of Trump’s plan point to examples of inefficiency in USAID programs, citing cases where aid was delayed or mismanaged. By introducing more direct funding models, they argue, U.S. taxpayer dollars could achieve a higher “return on health outcomes.” Political Implications Trump’s health aid overhaul proposal is not just about international development—it is also deeply political. Framing USAID as a “neo-colonial” institution resonates with a populist narrative that America should prioritize its own citizens and assert greater control over how taxpayer money is spent abroad. Domestically, the $11 billion plan faces scrutiny from Congress. Lawmakers from both parties have questioned whether dismantling USAID’s systems could destabilize ongoing health programs in countries where the U.S. has long-term commitments. The potential impact on global health security—including the fight against pandemics like COVID-19—adds another layer of concern. Internationally, U.S. allies and partner nations are watching closely. Sudden shifts in aid delivery could disrupt health programs in low- and middle-income countries, many of which rely on predictable funding cycles to maintain vaccination campaigns, maternal health services, and disease surveillance. Possible Benefits and Risks If executed carefully, the Trump-backed model could bring several benefits: Faster Response Times: Direct funding could accelerate delivery of vaccines, treatments, and emergency support. Innovation Boost: By partnering with private sector companies, the plan could accelerate development of new health technologies. Accountability: With performance-based metrics, the plan may better measure the impact of U.S. aid. However, the risks are equally significant: Disruption of Existing Programs: Abrupt changes could destabilize ongoing health projects. Loss of Expertise: USAID’s decades of experience in navigating local governance, supply chains, and community engagement may be hard to replace. Geopolitical Fallout: Allies accustomed to collaborating with USAID might see the move as destabilizing, reducing cooperation on global health initiatives. Looking Ahead As Trump and his allies continue to advocate for this $11 billion overhaul, the debate over the future of U.S. health aid is intensifying. Proponents view it as a necessary modernization of an outdated system, while critics fear it could undercut decades of carefully built infrastructure and global partnerships. Ultimately, the success of this plan will hinge on its ability to balance efficiency with stability, innovation with oversight, and political objectives with humanitarian needs. For now, the proposal remains controversial, representing a dramatic departure from traditional approaches to U.S. foreign aid. Whether it will reshape global health for the better—or simply create more uncertainty—remains to be seen. In the end, the Trump health plan is as much about ideology as it is about dollars. It challenges the conventional wisdom of international development and asks whether a more streamlined, results-focused approach can truly replace a system built over decades. As the world watches, the stakes could not be higher: the future of U.S. global health aid—and the lives it touches—hangs in the balance.
By Muhammad Hassanabout 16 hours ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.