Norway’s PM Says Crown Princess Showed ‘Poor Judgement’ Over Epstein Links

In 2026, Norway’s royal family faced global headlines after revelations about Crown Princess Mette‑Marit’s links to Jeffrey Epstein surfaced. Newly released documents showed she maintained some contact with Epstein even after his 2008 conviction.
The situation prompted an unusually direct response from Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, who publicly agreed with the Crown Princess’s statement that she had displayed “poor judgement.”
This blog dives into the controversy, the Crown Princess’s response, public reaction, and what this means for the royal family.
The Epstein Files: New Revelations
The controversy centers on documents from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Epstein files, which include hundreds of emails referencing the Crown Princess.
According to the files, some of her interactions with Epstein took place between 2011 and 2014, contradicting earlier palace statements that claimed she cut ties earlier.
Media reports describe certain exchanges as unusually warm or familiar, drawing global attention and raising questions about the timeline of contact.
Crown Princess Mette‑Marit Responds
Facing public scrutiny, the Crown Princess issued a statement acknowledging her “poor judgement”. She expressed regret for not understanding Epstein’s background sooner and described her actions as embarrassing.
She also emphasized her sympathy for the victims of Epstein’s crimes, clarifying that she does not condone his actions. Her statement was praised by some as honest but criticized by others who felt more transparency was required.
Prime Minister Støre Speaks Out
Norwegian Prime Ministers rarely comment on royal matters. That’s why Støre’s agreement with Mette‑Marit’s own criticism was notable.
He stated that her admission of poor judgement was accurate and suggested that others mentioned in the files should also clarify their involvement.
This rare political comment highlights how seriously Norway is taking the matter and underscores the expectation of accountability for public figures.
Public Reaction in Norway
The revelations sparked heated debate across media and social platforms.
Supporters appreciated the Crown Princess’s honesty and willingness to admit mistakes.
Critics argued that as a member of the royal family, she should have exercised greater caution.
Social media discussions ranged from calls for full transparency to broader debates about trust, responsibility, and the behavior of elite figures.
Impact on the Royal Family
This controversy comes at a sensitive time for Norway’s monarchy.
Crown Princess Mette‑Marit’s son, Marius Borg Høiby, is facing a highly publicized trial, attracting media attention.
Other members of the royal family, including Princess Märtha Louise, have faced scrutiny for personal and professional choices.
Together, these events have tested public confidence, even though polls show strong overall support for the monarchy.
Royal Accountability and Transparency
The Crown Princess’s public admission, backed by the Prime Minister, signals a push for transparency in the monarchy.
Analysts suggest that how the royal household addresses further questions about Epstein-related contacts will significantly influence public opinion in the months ahead. Some have even called for a parliamentary review.
Lessons on Leadership and Public Expectation
Modern media and global attention have transformed expectations for public figures. Leaders and royals are now held accountable in real time, and past actions are scrutinized like never before.
The Crown Princess episode reflects how accountability, honesty, and timely communication are essential to maintaining public trust.
Conclusion
Norway’s Crown Princess Mette‑Marit’s links to Jeffrey Epstein, and the Prime Minister’s public agreement about her poor judgement, have created a moment of reflection for the nation.
While the controversy is serious, the Crown Princess’s openness, combined with political acknowledgment, may strengthen calls for transparency and accountability.
For Norway, this episode underscores that even centuries-old institutions like the monarchy must navigate modern expectations and media scrutiny carefully.