‘Looks more majestic than usual’: After a snowstorm, Niagara Falls partially freezes into a ‘winter wonderland’
- This winter, areas near New York are seeing record-breaking low temperatures and freak weather instances such as unexpected snow blizzards and storms. After one such chilling storm that took over Canada and the US Tuesday, Niagara Falls partially froze over.
- Despite the low temperatures, tourists are continuing to flock to Niagara Falls to witness the movie-like landscape of the iconic waterfall. And the videos and photos of the partially frozen waterfall, which is 167 feet tall.
ABOUT NIAGARA
Niagara Falls is a group of three waterfalls located on the Niagara River in western New York and southeastern Ontario. The three falls, which are known as the American Falls, the Bridal Veil Falls, and the Horseshoe Falls, are among the most famous and spectacular waterfalls in the world.
The Niagara Falls are a popular tourist destination, with millions of visitors coming each year to see the falls and participate in various activities such as boat tours, hiking, and sightseeing. The falls are also an important source of hydroelectric power, with several hydroelectric power plants located downstream from the falls.
The Niagara Falls are formed by the Niagara River, which flows from Lake Erie into Lake Ontario. The river drops about 50 meters (164 feet) as it flows over the falls, creating a spectacular display of water and mist. The falls are surrounded by beautiful parkland, with many trails and viewpoints that offer stunning views of the falls and the surrounding landscape.
Location:
- Niagara Falls is located on the Niagara River in western New York and southeastern Ontario.It is situated about 25 miles (40 km) northwest of Buffalo, New York, and about 50 miles (80 km) southeast of Toronto, Ontario. The Niagara Falls are easily accessible from both cities, with many transportation options available, including buses, trains, and car rentals.
Composition:
- Niagara Falls is a group of three waterfalls, knowThe American Falls is located on the American side of the Niagara River, just downstream from Goat Island. It is about 176 feet (54 meters) high and about 1060 feet (323 meters) wide. The Bridal Veil Falls is a smaller waterfall located just downstream from the American Falls. It is about 181 feet (55 meters) high and about 460 feet (140 meters) wide.
- The Horseshoe Falls is the largest and most famous of the three falls. It is located on the Canadian side of the Niagara River, downstream from Goat Island. It is about 167 feet (51 meters) high and about 2600 feet (792 meters) wide. The Horseshoe Falls is sometimes referred to as the Canadian Falls.
- All three falls are known for their spectacular displays of water and mist, which can be seen from various viewpoints on both the American and Canadian sides of the falls.n as the American Falls, the Bridal Veil Falls, and the Horseshoe Falls.
Geology:
- The Niagara Falls were formed by the Niagara River, which flows from Lake Erie into Lake Ontario. The river drops about 50 meters (164 feet) as it flows over the falls, creating a spectacular display of water and mist.
- Geologically, the Niagara Falls were formed about 12,000 years ago during the last ice age. At that time, the Niagara River was much wider and shallower than it is today. As the ice age ended and the climate warmed, the Niagara River began to cut through the softer rock layers that lay beneath the harder layers of shale and limestone. This process eventually created the falls as we know them today.
- The Niagara Falls are constantly changing and evolving due to the erosive power of the water. The falls move about 1.5 meters (5 feet) downstream each year due to erosion, and their shape and appearance are constantly changing. Despite this, the Niagara Falls are considered to be a relatively stable waterfall, and they are not in danger of disappearing anytime in the near future.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from Aravindha Raaja and writers in Earth and other communities.
Open Systems Interconnect
OSI MODEL The OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) model is a framework for understanding how different networking protocols and technologies interact with each other. It divides the processes involved in transmitting data over a network into seven different layers, each of which is responsible for specific functions:
By Aravindha Raaja3 years ago in 01
Tea of Silence
The snow had covered the hills for days, turning the land into a quiet white world where sound seemed afraid to exist. On the highest of these hills, beneath a dry, leafless tree, a young man sat alone. The tree had long ago lost its strength, its branches thin and broken, but it still stood, as if refusing to disappear. The young man chose this place often, not because it was comfortable, but because it was honest.
By Bilal Mohammadi5 days ago in Earth
Europe Draws a Red Line on Greenland After a Year of Trying to Pacify Trump
For nearly a year, European leaders walked a diplomatic tightrope. They tried calm language, quiet reassurance, and strategic patience as former U.S. President Donald Trump repeatedly revived his controversial interest in Greenland. What began as provocative rhetoric gradually evolved into something Europe could no longer ignore. Now, after months of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, Europe has drawn a clear red line on Greenland — signaling that compromise has its limits when sovereignty and regional security are at stake. This shift marks more than a response to one leader’s remarks. It reflects Europe’s growing determination to defend territorial integrity, manage Arctic competition, and assert strategic autonomy in an increasingly unpredictable geopolitical environment. How Greenland Became a Flashpoint Again Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has long held strategic importance. Rich in rare earth minerals, located along key Arctic routes, and home to critical U.S. military infrastructure, the island sits at the crossroads of security, climate change, and great-power rivalry. Donald Trump’s original proposal in 2019 to “buy” Greenland was widely mocked in Europe. But as his political influence resurged, so did concerns that his renewed interest was not just symbolic. Over the past year, Trump’s rhetoric — framed around U.S. security, resource access, and countering China and Russia in the Arctic — became more persistent. European capitals initially chose restraint. Officials hoped that de-escalation, quiet diplomacy, and alliance solidarity would prevent the issue from spiraling into a transatlantic rift. A Year of European Pacification For much of the past year, Europe adopted a strategy of pacification rather than confrontation. Denmark emphasized its close defense cooperation with Washington. EU leaders reiterated NATO unity and the importance of Arctic stability. Diplomats avoided public criticism, choosing private channels instead. The goal was clear: prevent Trump’s Greenland narrative from becoming official U.S. policy while preserving transatlantic relations. However, this approach had limits. As Trump’s language grew sharper — hinting at leverage, pressure, or “strategic necessity” — European patience began to erode. What once sounded like political theater increasingly resembled a challenge to European sovereignty norms. Why Europe Finally Drew the Line Europe’s tougher stance did not emerge overnight. It was driven by several converging realities. 1. Sovereignty Is Non-Negotiable At the heart of Europe’s response is a firm principle: territorial sovereignty cannot be bargained away. Greenland is not a commodity, and its future cannot be dictated by external powers — regardless of alliance ties. European leaders made it clear that any attempt to apply pressure on Denmark or Greenland would cross a red line, undermining international law and democratic self-determination. 2. Arctic Competition Is Intensifying The Arctic is no longer a frozen backwater. Melting ice has opened new shipping routes and intensified competition over resources. Russia has militarized large parts of its Arctic territory, while China has declared itself a “near-Arctic state.” Against this backdrop, Europe fears that normalizing aggressive rhetoric over Greenland could set a dangerous precedent, encouraging other powers to challenge borders under the guise of security or economic necessity. 3. Europe’s Strategic Confidence Has Grown Compared to 2019, Europe today is less willing to absorb geopolitical shocks quietly. The war in Ukraine accelerated Europe’s defense integration and sharpened its sense of strategic responsibility. Standing firm on Greenland is part of a broader shift: Europe is signaling that being a U.S. ally does not mean surrendering political agency. Greenland’s Own Voice Matters One crucial difference between past debates and today is the prominence of Greenlandic leaders themselves. Officials in Nuuk have repeatedly emphasized that Greenland’s future will be decided by its people, not by foreign capitals. Calls for respect, partnership, and economic development — rather than transactional geopolitics — have resonated strongly in Europe. By drawing a red line, European leaders are also amplifying Greenland’s right to self-determination, reinforcing the idea that Arctic communities are stakeholders, not strategic prizes. What This Means for Transatlantic Relations Europe’s firmer stance does not signal a break with the United States. NATO cooperation in the Arctic remains strong, and U.S. military presence in Greenland continues with Danish consent. However, the message is unmistakable: allies must respect boundaries. European officials are increasingly willing to publicly disagree with Washington when core principles are threatened. This reflects a maturing alliance — one where unity does not require silence. In the long run, this clarity may actually strengthen transatlantic relations, reducing ambiguity and preventing future misunderstandings. A Signal Beyond Greenland Europe’s red line on Greenland sends a message far beyond the Arctic. It signals to Russia and China that Europe will defend its territorial order, even under pressure from powerful actors. It reassures smaller states that sovereignty remains a foundational norm. And it underscores that Europe is learning to balance diplomacy with firmness in an era of great-power competition. Conclusion: From Pacification to Principle After a year of cautious diplomacy, Europe has chosen principle over placation. The red line drawn around Greenland is not an act of hostility — it is an assertion of values. In a world where power politics are returning, Europe is making one thing clear: sovereignty is not negotiable, alliances are not blank checks, and Arctic stability requires respect — not rhetoric. Greenland may be vast and sparsely populated, but the message Europe is sending from its icy shores is unmistakably global.
By Muhammad Hassan8 days ago in Earth
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.