Mexico to sue Google for changing ‘Gulf of Mexico’ name on US maps

In a move that has ignited international debate, Mexico is preparing to sue Google over the tech giant's decision to rename the "Gulf of Mexico" to the "Gulf of America" on its U.S. maps. This change aligns with an executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump, mandating the renaming of the body of water. The Mexican government, led by President Claudia Sheinbaum, contends that this unilateral alteration infringes upon Mexico's sovereignty and disregards established international agreements.

Background of the Controversy

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order directing all federal agencies and associated platforms to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America." This directive was part of a broader initiative to "restore American pride in the history of American greatness." In compliance, Google updated its Maps service for users within the United States to reflect the new designation. Users in Mexico continue to see "Gulf of Mexico," while users in other countries see both names.

THE GUARDIAN

Mexico's Legal and Diplomatic Response

President Sheinbaum has been vocal in her opposition to this change. She argues that the United States lacks the legal authority to unilaterally rename a body of water shared by multiple nations. Citing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Sheinbaum emphasizes that a nation's sovereignty extends only up to 12 nautical miles from its coastline. Beyond this limit, international waters are not subject to unilateral national renaming.

CNN

In a formal letter addressed to Google, Sheinbaum articulated Mexico's stance, stating that the renaming could only apply within the 12 nautical miles off the U.S. coastlines. She urged Google to reconsider its compliance with the executive order, highlighting that such actions could set a concerning precedent for international relations and corporate responsibility.

U.S. NEWS

Google's Position and Actions

Google has defended its decision by pointing to its longstanding policy of reflecting official government designations in its mapping services. The company stated, "We have a longstanding practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources." This approach aims to provide users with information consistent with official records, even when such changes are contentious.

THE GUARDIAN

However, this stance has not mitigated the backlash. Critics argue that by acquiescing to unilateral political decisions, Google risks compromising its neutrality and global responsibility. The situation raises questions about the role of multinational corporations in geopolitical disputes and their obligations to international consensus versus national directives.

International Implications

The renaming controversy has strained diplomatic relations between the United States and Mexico. Mexico asserts that the name "Gulf of Mexico" has been internationally recognized since 1607 and is acknowledged by the United Nations. The unilateral decision to rename the gulf is perceived as an affront to Mexico's historical and geographical heritage.

AP NEWS

Beyond the U.S.-Mexico dynamic, this issue sets a concerning precedent for international geographic nomenclature. If countries or corporations can unilaterally alter the names of shared natural features, it could lead to increased geopolitical tensions and a fragmented approach to global mapping standards.

Potential Legal Proceedings

Mexico is exploring legal avenues to challenge Google's compliance with the U.S. executive order. President Sheinbaum has indicated that if Google does not revert to the original naming convention, Mexico may file a civil lawsuit. The legal argument would likely center on the violation of international agreements and the overreach of national policies into shared international domains.

REUTERS

Such a lawsuit could have far-reaching implications, potentially influencing how tech companies navigate conflicting national directives and international norms. It may also prompt a reevaluation of the mechanisms in place for resolving disputes over geographic names and the role of international bodies in mediating such conflicts.

Broader Context and Reactions

This controversy is emblematic of the broader challenges that arise when political decisions intersect with global digital platforms. As gatekeepers of information, companies like Google wield significant influence over public perception and knowledge. Their decisions on matters like geographic naming can have profound cultural and political repercussions.

Public reaction has been mixed. Some U.S. citizens view the renaming as a patriotic gesture, while many Mexicans and international observers see it as an unnecessary and provocative act. The debate has also sparked discussions about the responsibilities of tech giants in maintaining objectivity and respecting international consensus.

Conclusion

The dispute over the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America underscores the complex interplay between national policies, corporate practices, and international law. As Mexico prepares to take legal action against Google, the outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how global companies navigate the delicate balance between adhering to national directives and upholding international agreements. It also highlights the need for clear guidelines and collaborative approaches when making decisions that impact multiple nations and cultures.