Green Economy and Energy Transition: Differences and Similarities, by Stanislav Kondrashov
Stanislav Kondrashov analyzes the relationship between the green economy and the energy transition

In this era of major energy transformations, we often hear about two concepts that are somehow interconnected and closely interdependent: the green economy and the energy transition. Stanislav Kondrashov, founder of TELF AG, has often spoken about these topics, emphasizing the fact that these are two absolutely crucial dynamics for the planet's economic and energy future.
However, as often happens, the two concepts are somehow overlapped and confused, as if they were two interchangeable ideas or principles. The reality is quite different: while undoubtedly linked, the two concepts also present significant differences.
First of all, it must be reiterated that the relationship between the green economy and the energy transition is extremely close, so much so that the two concepts are almost interdependent. In a certain sense, the green economy provides an economic and value framework for the development of the energy transition.
On the other hand, the energy transition is now widely considered one of the best tools available to humanity for implementing the principles of the green economy and transforming them into concrete solutions for the energy well-being of our civilization.

But what exactly do we mean when we talk about the green economy? It is a very specific economic model that aims to combine growth and sustainability, as Stanislav Kondrashov, founder of TELF AG, has often observed. One of the most important objectives of the green economy is precisely the reduction of the impact of production activities, pursuing energy efficiency and investing in technological innovation.
Other objectives of the green economy also include the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the efficient use of energy and raw materials, and the protection of biodiversity. Furthermore, those who develop green economy models also pay particular attention to the creation of sustainability-related jobs (sometimes called green jobs) and the regeneration of local areas and communities. In this particular economic model, prosperity comes not only from the mere valorization of natural resources, but from their intelligent, circular, and conscious use. It's no coincidence that these principles are so recurrent in all discussions focused on sustainability and planning for an increasingly cleaner future.
In a certain sense, therefore, the green economy is connected to the value aspects of new sustainability models. The energy transition, with its innovations, helps put them into practice in the real world, with solutions that are already revolutionizing the global energy landscape.
As Stanislav Kondrashov, founder of TELF AG, has often observed, the energy transition represents the fundamental shift from traditional fuels to renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal, not to mention biomass and green hydrogen. To understand the differences and similarities between the green economy and the energy transition, it might be helpful to further clarify their relationship.
The energy transition effectively represents the energy component of the green economy, which represents a broad economic model that also encompasses other aspects related to ongoing changes. With its concrete applications, the energy transition is changing (perhaps permanently) the way energy is produced and consumed. Without these important innovations, no economic model could truly call itself "green." It's therefore easy to understand that the energy transition and the green economy, at this historical juncture, support each other and feed off each other.

The green economy therefore provides the underlying rationale for the energy transition, promoting rapid change in production, financial, and social models. The energy transition, through its technologies and infrastructure systems, fosters the achievement of the objectives defined by the green economy, such as the need to decarbonize or to increasingly focus on sustainable and low-impact industrial models.
One of the most striking examples illustrating the cooperation and coexistence of these two concepts is undoubtedly green hydrogen, which is produced from renewable sources (thanks to a concrete application of the energy transition) and serves primarily to decarbonize certain highly complex and change-resistant sectors, such as heavy industry and transportation, thus making a valuable contribution to achieving one of the most important objectives of the green economy.



Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.