Critique logo

Ageless Morality or Outdated Context?

A candid reflection on the contradictions of biblical ethics

By CindyšŸŽ€Published about a year ago • Updated about a year ago • 1 min read
Ageless Morality or Outdated Context?
Photo by Pierre Bamin on Unsplash

I just wanted to share this little monologue I wrote via private message with a Christian. I can get quite eloquent when I'm fired up. :)

---

"You don’t get to have it both ways. You don’t get to argue that the Bible is inspired by ageless moral perfection and then insist that the 'difficult' passages of the Bible need to be understood through the context of things being 'different back then.' Either the morality in the Bible is ageless and perfect, or it ages because it is far from perfect.

Surely, a morally perfect, omniscient being would have had the foresight to realize that genocide, rape, and slavery might not look as good on His CV in 2024 as they did in Old Testament times.

And you know, perhaps things might not have been so different from modern times if the writers of the Bible had spent less time commanding the Jews not to eat shellfish or wear clothes of mixed fibers and instead wrote something as straightforward and commonsense as: 'Don’t treat women like chattels or spoils of war.'

Imagine that. Imagine if a morally perfect being had bothered to etch a little note in the margins somewhere, advising the Jewish people not to be so horribly misogynistic. So much suffering and torment could have been spared."

---

Dialogue

About the Creator

CindyšŸŽ€

Hey, I’m Cindy – a K-pop newbie turned addict with a keyboard and way too many opinions. When I’m not screaming about talented artists, I’m writing poetry or ranting about my life.

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments (6)

Sign in to comment
  • Dana Crandellabout a year ago

    Congratulations on making the Leaderboard!

  • Maryam Batoolabout a year ago

    Congratulations, Cindy šŸ˜

  • Komalabout a year ago

    Wow! Girl congratulations on winning third place for The Emerging Creator this week šŸŽ‰šŸŽ‰šŸ„³ Such a masterpiece ✨

  • Lol, this is why I'm an agnostic 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • Sam Spinelliabout a year ago

    ā€œā€¦ might not look as good on his CVā€¦ā€ hahaha wow, that’s powerful, scathing, and kinda hilarious all at once. Also, you’re right. everything you said so cleanly, in ways that seem clear and fair and beyond debate. The Bible did not age well— some messages can still contain wisdom but they need to be weighed against common sense, science, and the good of modern society. My favorite Bible passage is the one about a group of kids making fun of Elisha’s baldness. Then he curses them in the name of the Lord, and God (being petty beyond all belief) summons bears to maul 42 of the kids… all because they laughed at some dude’s bald head! I think if 42 kids laughed at my bald head it would be kinda hilarious, can’t imagine being hurt enough to want to see them murdered by Holy Bears bears. The whole passage is just jarring and absurd, to think that a godly man would be so vain about his scalp that he’d meet the jeering of children with violence and that God would provide said violence in the form of a divine mauling is just… totally mad. Like a fever dream. To me that’s the perfect example of the Bible contradicting itself— and it chews the idea of biblical fundamentalism to pieces. The others would be Adam and Eve and the fact that a 2 individual breeding population would never sustainably procreate— and also implies LOTS of inbreeding in genesis. The other one I like is the story of the ark, which again, breeding pairs of two aren’t sustainable, but also: clearly that boat wasn’t physically large enough to house 2 of every animal, along with the food they’d need for a 40 day cruise. Also, how would Noah and his fam ever clean that much animal shit? But objections based in science don’t really motivate people who relegate all their belief to biblical faith, that’s why the story about the bear mauling is my go to. If you ask a fundamentalist whether that literally happened, and if so, why? How would God condone brutal, senseless violence against children like that? they sometimes start to realize… either the Bible isn’t literal or God is a raging sociopath. All this being said, I think the Bible still has some beautiful parts, mostly in psalms and the New Testament. But I can’t understand why modern people would willingly take the Bible literally, or think that it should provide any moral guidance without modern correction. Anyway, sorry for the long winded comment! I’m glad you shared this snapshot of your convo— it speaks to a frustration I’ve often felt in similar conversations, and I think you said it so succinctly and powerfully that it would be a shame not to share it.

  • Qurat ul Ainabout a year ago

    Wow, this is an incredibly powerful and eloquent piece! šŸ”„ Your words really challenge traditional views with such conviction and clarity. šŸ‘šŸ’Æ

Find us on social media

Miscellaneous links

  • Explore
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Support

Ā© 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.