Today I exposed my cheating boyfriend
my cheating boyfriend
Today I found out my boyfriend of 1.5 years cheated on me with his "lesbian" coworker. For context, we lived together and had a rough patch for the past month, surprisingly at the same time that he cheated.
My boyfriend was away from home because he went to a hardstyle party.
I got a "Hey girly" message from the EX fiance of the girl he cheated on me with. She sent me pictures of their text conversations and she told me that she broke off their engagement because of cheating.
At first I didn't believe her but the pictures were very compelling and even if it wasn't physical cheating, this was enough for me to break up over.
I called him up in a panic, trying to get him home. I lied and told him my father was in the hospital and that he needed to come home NOW.
He took the first bus home and was biking his way to my house. I told him that my mom took him to the hospital so the car shouldn't have been out front.
We were calling while he was on his way here and he asked me why the car was out front. I couldn't come up with a lie quick enough and I hung up on him in my panic.
He knew that something was off and immediately biked away, I couldn't confront him.
I was so upset that I logged into his snapchat and forwarded all the screenshots I got of their conversations to the group chats of his workplace and to all the group conversations with his friends.
I also posted a rather disgusting text message between the two on his public story.
The account is now deactivated.
He still has not responded to me and it's been HOURS. I have also called his mom and told her what happened.
He had sex with her while he knows that I struggle with sex because I've been used before. For context, my ex immediately dumped me after we had sex.
So that hurts more. We've also had a little vacation during the time he was cheating.
I'm so hurt, so broken.
I don't know what to do and I just want to hold him, eventhough he has hurt me so much. I'm too forgiving to handle this.
I did not deserve this..
EDIT: Apparently everyone at work already knew. Even his boss. I'm absolutely disgusted that no one had the balls to tell me.
EDIT PART TWO: Thank you all for reaching out and wishing me well. I still have not heard from him and it's nearly 2AM.
I just want closure, I can't have closure if I don't see him and I know that sounds extremely silly but I just need him to tell me in my face so that I can stop missing him.
I hope I fall asleep soon
Comments
It sounds like you're dealing with an incredibly painful situation. Cheating is always heartbreaking, and it’s completely understandable that you’d feel broken after what happened. Lean on your support system—friends, family, or even a therapist. You deserve to heal and move forward from this with someone who respects and loves you fully.
Stop with that closure non sense! You love to be hurt and humiliated ? Wasn’t enough all the things he done with the support of the all group? Come on ,have some self respect,took your stuff and leave without wasting anymore time with that pos.
And also go on therapy to heal your trauma but also to work on your self esteem/worth,boost your confidence !!
Yeah it is over. Now get some therapy so you can heal from this and move on. Cheating is a deal breaker for me because it destroys the relationship and trust. Worse for you in this case because he knows your history.
About the Creator
sagar dhital
I'm a creative writer in the way that I write. I hold the pen in this unique and creative way you've never seen. The content which I write... well, it's still to be determined if that's any good.
Keep reading
More stories from sagar dhital and writers in Criminal and other communities.
Ladies - be cautious in Tamarindo - potential human trafficking
A story of caution. This was a key word -potential- “bad” situation that I was able to get out of in Tamarindo. Yesterday was at the beach for the first time with my husband. Went for a walk to look at the shells as it was low tide. In my bikini, nothing else with me. Man yells from the top of the beach down at me as I’m walking. I have a drink and my hand and motion it as a cheers and keep walking. He approaches me as I move up the beach and starts talking. Most locals are kind and usually offering a service on the beach so I figure he is doing the same.
By sagar dhital2 years ago in Criminal
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 5 days ago in Criminal
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.