Inaugural Episode Of The MJonCrime Podcast: Hooked On True Crime
Why do we love true crime stories? MJ digs into the suspense, psychology, and cultural obsession behind the genre: Real cases, tough questions, and the human side of our fascination with crime.
Well, folks, my podcast is ready. Up and running. Welcome to “MJonCrime,” the podcast that doesn’t just skim the surface—it digs deep, sifts through the dirt, and brings you the stories that most folks only whisper about. I’m your host, MJ, and after thirty years as a federal agent, I’ve seen the best and worst this world has to offer. I’ve walked the back alleys, I’ve spent many hours on surveillance, sat in the interrogation rooms, and stood in the living rooms of families forever changed by crime. Now, my badge and credentials are in my pocket, keyboard, and screen - my beat. I’m inviting you to pull up a chair, grab a cup of coffee, and join me as we go behind the headlines and into the heart of true crime.
This isn’t your average true crime podcast. There’s no Hollywood gloss here, no dramatic reenactments or over-the-top narration. What you get is the unvarnished truth—the kind of stories you only hear when the courtroom empties out, or when the last cup of coffee is poured at the precinct. I bring you the cases that kept me up at night, the ones that made me question everything I thought I knew about justice, and the ones that still haunt the people who lived through them.
Each episode of “MJonCrime” is a front-row seat to the real work of criminal investigations. I’ll try to walk you through the process, step by step, from the first frantic 911 call to the final verdict—or the cold silence of an unsolved case. You’ll hear about the suspects who thought they could outsmart the system, the victims whose voices demand to be heard, and the investigators who refused to give up, even when the trail went cold. I’ll break down the methods used, the mistakes made, and the moments of pure luck that sometimes turned the tide.
But this podcast isn’t just about the cases—it’s about the people. The mothers who never stopped searching for answers. The detectives who carried the weight of unsolved crimes on their shoulders. The witnesses and informants who risked everything to help bring justice, and the communities left to pick up the pieces. I’ve always believed that every case is personal, and every story matters. That’s why I take the time to dig into the details and to give you the kind of insight you can’t get from a headline or a news clip.
You’ll also get a look at the realities of law enforcement—the long hours, the dead ends, the gut instincts that sometimes pay off, and the bureaucracy that can slow everything to a crawl. I’ll share the lessons I learned the hard way, the moments that made me proud to wear the badge, and the ones that made me question the system I swore to uphold. If you’re looking for easy answers or black-and-white morality, you won’t find it here. What you will find is honesty, empathy, and a commitment to telling the truth, no matter how messy it gets.
“MJonCrime” is for anyone who wants more than just a story—it’s for those who want to understand the why behind the what, to see the human side of crime, and to walk a mile in the shoes of those who investigate it. Whether you’re a fellow investigator, a true crime junkie, or just someone who’s curious about the world behind the badge, you’re welcome here.
So pour yourself a strong cup of coffee, settle in, and get ready to see true crime through the eyes of someone who’s lived it. We will discuss cases that shaped my career, the cases that changed lives, and the moments that remind us all why justice matters. This is “MJonCrime”—where every case is personal, every story is real, and the truth is always worth chasing. Every crime has a story. My mission. Tell it.
If you enjoy my writing or podcast, would you consider a $1.00 or more tip using the Vocal Media tipping link? Thank you!
About the Creator
MJonCrime
My 30-year law enforcement career fuels my interest in true crime writing. My writing extends my investigative mindset, offers comprehensive case overviews, and invites you, my readers, to engage in pursuing truth and resolution.
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 4 days ago in Criminal
Sabrina Carpenter Accused of Copying Tiffany A♡ Luna’s Crown Logo—While Her Federal Plagiarism Case Spirals Into Further Career Ruin
Sabrina Carpenter’s pop princess image is crumbling under the weight of what is now being described as one of the most damaging plagiarism cases in music history. The Disney-born starlet is not only battling a brutal federal lawsuit over her song Espresso, but now faces new backlash after debuting a crown into her updated logo June 6, 2025 eerily similar to Tiffany A♡ Luna’s crown, which was quietly unveiled just weeks before — the same Tiffany A♡ Luna currently suing her in federal court.
By Dena Falken Esq7 days ago in Criminal
Let's Don't Do This
"I just can't do this anymore..." "Do what?" What can't you do? Put gas in your own car? I swear to God you make me take care of everything, don't you? You know I'm on my way to work right now but that never stops you from bothering me, does it?"
By Shirley Belk7 days ago in Fiction
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.