I Was Stalked By A Cop
Don’t blame the “Florida woman”, blame the “Florida cop”.
My name is Tureygua Inaru. To protect myself, and prevent future acts of stalking, I won’t share many personal details about myself.
I was stalked by a Florida cop.
Specifically, a cop from the Osceola County Sheriff’s Department. Yes, the same Osceola County Sheriff’s Department where the sheriff was just fired for reports of running an illegal gambling operation. But former Sheriff Marco Lopez’s criminal activity is just the tip of the iceberg. I’m here to tell you that the Florida cops have been oppressing the people and acting like an organized gang for years. This is my story, and I’m sure it’s just one of many.
A male cop from Osceola County, Florida stalked me and wrote a false police report about me a few years ago, which almost destroyed the lives of me and my family. Why he did it, I cannot say “beyond a shadow of a doubt”. But what I can tell you is that he wrote a false police report about me, where he claimed that I committed a horrific crime: attempted murder. Every aspect of his police report was a lie. He made false accusations about my family to provide a fake “motive”, he used fake “quotes”, he lied about my education and work history to make it seem as if I was uneducated and unemployed, he claimed that there were witnesses, undercover detectives, and even a false confession from me. None of it was true. But just because he was a police officer, a lot of people believed him, which caused me and my family massive legal trouble, led to us living in full blown fear and shame for years, and led to me being sexually trafficked for years in jail.
Some justice is finally being had in Osceola County in general now that Sheriff Marco Lopez is now former sheriff Marco Lopez, and he is facing criminal charges. But as someone who is still seeking justice myself, I am telling anyone who cares to look deeper. Don’t stop with Marco Lopez, there is much more going on here. If the top dog, the sheriff of the whole sheriff’s office is corrupt, what does that say about the rest of the officers who work there? How many false police reports have Florida cops written? Before automatically believing a news story, ask yourself who the person is that is being accused, and what the cops have to gain from falsely accusing that person and their family. Pro-tip: it always has to do with money, or sex and money. And remember that former sheriff Marco Lopez is not an outlier—I hate to say this, but my experience has taught me that most Florida cops are criminals, who use their badge not to “enforce the law”, but to rape and sexually traffick, and to get away with stealing from people and breaking the law, and the same is true with most Florida corrections officers and any other kind of government worker who works in “security”.
I hope anyone who is familiar with my story understands the importance of the truth, and of justice, and of standing up for yourself even when everyone is against you. As a woman of color, and as a member of a religious minority, there has been nothing scarier than having a stalker who is a white male cop. He intimidated me into silence for a long time, knowing that I stood no chance of defending myself or of being believed, and also knowing that even the people who knew he was lying would be too scared of him and the police, or not care enough about me, to help me. He not only stole financially from me and my family, but he took something even more valuable: my voice.
But now I’m taking it back.
About the Creator
Keep reading
More stories from writers in Criminal and other communities.
Minneapolis ICE Shooting Updates
In recent weeks, Minneapolis has found itself at the center of a growing legal and political controversy following a shooting involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. What initially appeared to be a straightforward federal use-of-force investigation has evolved into a broader dispute between state authorities and federal officials, raising serious questions about transparency, jurisdiction, and accountability. The most significant development so far is the state’s claim that it has been denied access to key evidence related to the incident. As public attention intensifies, the case is no longer just about what happened during the shooting. It is increasingly about who controls the facts, who gets to investigate them, and how justice is supposed to function when federal and state systems collide. What We Know About the Minneapolis ICE Shooting The shooting occurred during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. ICE agents were reportedly conducting official duties when gunfire erupted, resulting in injuries and immediate emergency response. Federal authorities confirmed the incident and stated that internal protocols were activated, including an automatic review by federal oversight bodies. From the beginning, details were limited. Officials cited the ongoing nature of the investigation and concerns about officer safety. This lack of information, while not unusual in federal cases, quickly became a point of friction for Minnesota state authorities, who argued that the public deserved clarity and that the state had a legal role to play in examining the incident. State Authorities Push for Transparency Minnesota state officials, including investigators and legal representatives, formally requested access to evidence connected to the shooting. This evidence reportedly includes body camera footage, surveillance recordings, forensic reports, and internal communication logs from the operation. According to state representatives, these requests were either delayed or denied outright. The state has since gone on record stating that it cannot independently assess the legality of the shooting without full access to the materials. This denial has fueled concerns that federal agencies are operating without sufficient external oversight, especially in incidents involving potential civilian harm. State leaders emphasized that their position is not adversarial by default. Rather, they argue that cooperation between federal and state agencies is essential to maintain public trust, particularly in communities already wary of immigration enforcement. Federal Response and Jurisdictional Limits Federal officials, for their part, maintain that the investigation falls squarely under federal jurisdiction. ICE operates as a federal agency, and shootings involving federal officers are typically reviewed internally and, when appropriate, by federal prosecutors or inspectors general. In statements released following the controversy, federal representatives cited legal restrictions that limit the sharing of evidence during an active investigation. They also stressed that premature disclosure could compromise witness testimony or investigative integrity. This explanation, while legally grounded, has done little to ease state frustrations. Critics argue that “ongoing investigation” has too often been used as a blanket justification for withholding information, even in cases where transparency could prevent misinformation and public unrest. Community Reaction and Public Trust The Minneapolis community has responded with a mix of concern, anger, and fatigue. For many residents, particularly in immigrant and marginalized communities, the shooting has reopened long-standing fears about aggressive enforcement tactics and lack of accountability. Community leaders and advocacy groups have called for the immediate release of non-sensitive evidence, arguing that transparency is a prerequisite for trust. Peaceful demonstrations and public forums have highlighted a broader demand: that no law enforcement agency, federal or otherwise, should be beyond scrutiny. Local officials echoed these concerns, noting that Minneapolis has spent years attempting to rebuild trust between residents and law enforcement. The perception that evidence is being withheld threatens to undermine that progress. Legal Implications of Denied Evidence From a legal standpoint, the state’s inability to access evidence raises complex questions. While federal agencies do have authority over their operations, states also have a responsibility to investigate deaths or injuries occurring within their borders. Legal experts suggest that this dispute could set a precedent. If states are routinely blocked from reviewing evidence in federal use-of-force cases, it may limit their ability to pursue independent inquiries or bring charges under state law when applicable. Some analysts believe the issue could ultimately be resolved in court, with judges determining whether the state has a legal right to access certain materials. Such a ruling could have national implications, influencing how future federal-state conflicts are handled. Political Dimensions of the Case The Minneapolis ICE shooting has also taken on a political dimension. Immigration enforcement remains a deeply divisive issue, and incidents like this tend to amplify existing ideological divides. State officials critical of federal immigration policies view the denial of evidence as symptomatic of a larger lack of accountability. Meanwhile, supporters of strict federal enforcement argue that state interference could hinder effective operations and put officers at risk. This political tension complicates the path forward. What might otherwise be a procedural disagreement risks becoming a symbolic battle over immigration, law enforcement authority, and states’ rights. What Happens Next? As of now, the investigation continues under federal oversight, while the state explores its legal options. Negotiations between state and federal officials have reportedly not been ruled out, suggesting that a compromise could still be reached. Potential next steps include limited evidence sharing under confidentiality agreements, congressional inquiries, or judicial review. Each option carries its own risks and consequences, both legally and politically. What remains clear is that public pressure is unlikely to fade. Minneapolis residents, like many Americans, are demanding clarity, fairness, and accountability in cases involving law enforcement use of force. A Broader Conversation About Accountability The Minneapolis ICE shooting is no longer just a single incident under investigation. It has become a lens through which broader issues are being examined: the balance of power between federal and state authorities, the limits of transparency, and the role of public oversight in a democratic society. Whether or not the state ultimately gains access to the evidence, the controversy has already sparked an important conversation. How that conversation translates into policy, practice, or reform remains to be seen, but its impact will likely extend far beyond Minneapolis. In the end, accountability is not only about assigning blame. It is about ensuring that systems function openly and fairly, especially when lives are affected. The outcome of this case may help determine how well those principles are upheld in the future.
By Saboor Brohi 3 days ago in Criminal
Sabrina Carpenter Accused of Copying Tiffany A♡ Luna’s Crown Logo—While Her Federal Plagiarism Case Spirals Into Further Career Ruin
Sabrina Carpenter’s pop princess image is crumbling under the weight of what is now being described as one of the most damaging plagiarism cases in music history. The Disney-born starlet is not only battling a brutal federal lawsuit over her song Espresso, but now faces new backlash after debuting a crown into her updated logo June 6, 2025 eerily similar to Tiffany A♡ Luna’s crown, which was quietly unveiled just weeks before — the same Tiffany A♡ Luna currently suing her in federal court.
By Dena Falken Esq6 days ago in Criminal
Comments