Criminal logo

Allegations of Genocide in Gaza: Examining the Crisis in Palestine

A Legal Examination of Genocide Claims Amidst Escalating Violence in Gaza

By Unoffitial NasifPublished 9 months ago 3 min read

Introduction

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one of the most protracted and explosive disputes of modern history, has once more reached catastrophic levels. The violence levels in Gaza, particularly since the October 2023 escalation, have provoked growing international outrage and widespread allegations of war crimes—some even going so far as to label the Israeli intervention as genocide.

Although the term "genocide" carries extraordinary legal and moral weight, its application to what is currently occurring is extremely controversial. The legal meaning of genocide, the current humanitarian crisis in Gaza, and the perceptions underlying the accusation are the subject of this article. Defining Genocide: The Legal Definition

Genocide is defined as acts committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group in whole or in part by the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. The acts are the following: Killing members of the group

Causing serious bodily or mental harm

Inflicting conditions calculated to bring about the group's physical destruction

Forcing measures to prevent births

transferring the children of the group forcibly International law demands intent and systematic action to destroy a protected group to be considered as genocide.

The Gaza Situation Following Hamas-led incursions on October 7, 2023, when over 1,100 Israelis were killed, Israel retaliated with a massive military operation in Gaza. Over 30,000 Palestinians, including thousands of women and children, are estimated to have been killed ever since, and the majority of Gaza's infrastructure—hospitals, schools, and refugee camps—have been flattened.

The Israeli government claims it is attacking Hamas militants and not civilians. However, serious concerns have been raised by the scale of the destruction, the blocking of humanitarian relief, and statements of Israeli leaders. Why Activists and Researchers Invoke the Term "Genocide" A number of international human rights organizations, legal scholars, and even United Nations officials have suggested a potential genocidal intent, referring to: Statements by Israeli officials calling for the destruction of Gaza or referring to Palestinians in dehumanizing terms. Indiscriminate bombardment of densely populated civilian centers.

Blockades and sieges that deny civilians food, water, and medical supplies.

Attacks on health infrastructure, which has led to the collapse of Gaza's health system.

In January 2024, South Africa filed a case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) accusing it of having committed genocide in Gaza. The court did not decide whether genocide had occurred but acknowledged that there was a "plausible risk" and ordered Israel to immediately implement measures to prevent genocidal acts.

International Response to Israel's Defense The Israeli administration denies absolutely the accusation of genocide and maintains that its military response is an understandable retaliation against terrorism.

Israel argues that the death of civilians is unintentional and that Hamas uses civilian facilities as cover. Israel's right to defend itself has been supported by the United States and various Western allies, who also expressed concern over the humanitarian crisis. On the other hand, the majority of the Global South, including countries from Africa, Latin America, and the Muslim world, have condemned the assault on Gaza as disproportionate and potentially genocidal. Voices from Gaza Palestinian civilians in Gaza are reporting a waking nightmare: displacement, hunger, the deaths of loved ones, and nowhere to turn for safety. Whole families have been obliterated. Aid convoys often can't get through to those in need. The psychological damage is incalculable, particularly for children. For many Palestinians, this is more than war—it's an existential crisis.

Conclusion: The Weight of Words and the Imperative of Action

The human cost is undeniable, regardless of whether the actions in Gaza do or do not meet the definition of genocide in law. Accusations of genocide must be carefully legally considered, but they also challenge the international community to confront the deeper injustices and power asymmetries at the foundation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The violence must stop, civilians must be safeguarded, and international law must be upheld, that is certain. The world must make sure that accountability and justice are not lost in the fog of war, whether through the courts, diplomacy, or popular pressure.

capital punishmentguiltyinnocencemafiajury

About the Creator

Reader insights

Be the first to share your insights about this piece.

How does it work?

Add your insights

Comments

There are no comments for this story

Be the first to respond and start the conversation.

Sign in to comment

    Find us on social media

    Miscellaneous links

    • Explore
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Support

    © 2026 Creatd, Inc. All Rights Reserved.