
Moderately concerning random thoughts of mostly/mildly/relatively/realistically/reasonably confusing nature {[(((?)))]}
Fair warning ~ attempting to read as/during writing is both pointless/non-beneficial and could create confusion/misinterpretation until better organized (/this statement is inherently confusing) also there is no/minimal validity of truth posited with any respective statement/claims/etc simply ideas and thoughts worthy of articulation, but digression is implied/implicit
There is little to no value in using,reproducing,etc this info without proper/full comprehension and understanding in some cohesive sensability or with reasonable confidence/meaning
no/none/most/etc claims aren't inherently true nor original, but sometimes stating the obvious, using established/proven claims and statements is necessary for furthering/expanding upon points and creating more clarity, outside of as well as because of those/these existing truisms, claims, hypotheses, data,etc
Also very little of this is chronologically ordered or even organized by topics, themes, and subject/content; although some has been grouped or reasonably put together, was still pulled from non-dated and out of order notes, so any seeming cohesion and linkage/relation is either unintentional, (co)incidental, or noticed/changed while and after editing and revising process(es)
notes/defining use of symbols and spacing (and most relevant and apparent notes taking techniques):
-question marks in parentheses (usually) indicates either confusing wording/grammer, suggested edits, or incomplete arguments/points/logic that need reframing/additions/clarification/etc
-use or slashes/breaks represents either or both conjunction of and+or, also in place of list notations/grammer when a list of words is relative or attached to one object/subject connection within a sentence/logical frame(proof?)
-spacing and grouping of points indicates implied meaning and literal distance/difference between points, groups of ideas, and themes etc (same with squiglys and dashes)
-most info in parentheses is either: removed/reworded edits from notes, extra info not necessarily in notes, suggested (retroactive/retcon) edits and additions, grammatical additions/suggestions/pluralities, etc
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-not every matter of safety is a morally good/bad choice, many situations are naturally unsafe regardless of effects/options of decisions
-trying to find space for universally healthy and beneficial reasons and purposes
-not letting any forms and types of repetition ot associations negatively affect real situations
-being understanding that these situations and processes are fluid and have little meaning besides confusion
-actually caring about what ways that these processes affect how any variations react accordingly to that
-leaving out/ignoring results that make for more confusion/?
-not getting/being affected by all the false assumptions/assertions
-doing anything that would could obviously and clearly reasonably upset anyone and blaming them for being upset/hurt




Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.