As Prince Harry allegedly calls in Lawyers, was there really a fight over remarks Prince Andrew supposedly made about Meghan Markle as reported?
Certain timelines do not stack up in the MailOnline alleged story. The media pack picked upon the alleged altercation about a supposedly behind his back remark about Meghan Markle.

Newsweek reports that Prince Harry has allegedly called in lawyers in their words "over Prince Andrew - Meghan fight story". Except that the media organisation at the centre of the story, the MailOnline, has a Breaking News story as follows

Yes, you are reading it as I did, an alleged "family gathering in 2013". Were Prince Harry and Meghan Markle already dating in 2013? The Duke and Duchess of Sussex actually started their romance in mid 2016 and were married in 2018. How come then if you read all the media pack who normally just repeat verbatim a story they especially find "juicy clickbait" claimed it was over behind the back remarks made about the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle?
This brings me to that word "clickbait" which happens quiet a lot in that MailOnline. There are also other alleged manipulation of the sharing counters of stories concerning the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle written by the MailOnline. Take a look at how the "share counter" circled in red vanishes over time from when the video is first published on the MailOnline.

And in sequence of screenshots over a timeline of several minutes later from first publication of the video with 24K shares.

Down to 15K shares and a several minutes later.

The vanishing counter of the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle's popular videos on the MailOnline.
Sorry, my apologies. The MailOnline narrative is that the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle is not popular in Britain. Every little helps to keep that narrative should I say, allegedly.
Here is another narrative. The Duke and the Duchess of Sussex are often accused of "overshadowing" the Royal family diary. The accusations are that the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle in particular allegedly makes it a point of choosing to go on her public engagements to coincide with that of the Royal family diary. It is said she even tries to "make money" using the Royal family with her As Ever announcements of product drops. Is it therefore a coincidence or just my confirmation bias that this particular alleged story of a "fight about Meghan Markle" happens to just drop in the media on the eve of her birthday on the 4th of August 2025?
I can make a prediction or call it my precognition if it is not a coincidence that this will roll on tomorrow, the 4th of August 2025, which is the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle's birthday. Did I mention that the MailOnline supposedly serialised this book which has this alleged story?
Hang on, by the time you have read this up to this point, a few minutes so far that MailOnline video sharing counter would have gone down.

I think I will just say it out loud. Is it a coincidence that this alleged story involves a so called "fight"? Who has read Prince Harry's Spare? This is now the time I will whisper this only once, "imitation is the sincerest form of flattery". How to sell a Royal book? Why not emulate one of the bestsellers in history? With the added bonus of using those who are allegedly unpopular in Britain anyway if you believe what they tell us.
For those who are still captivated by that video sharing counter of the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle. Yes, it does run down to zero. They could actually simply show an embedded video of her Instagram @Meghan post which others do. Yet the MailOnline usually edit their own video taken from her Instagram post and insert their own counter. Did I mentioned that the MailOnline have given themselves five days of promotions of this book?



Comments