Trump Says ‘I Won’t Use Force’ to Obtain Greenland in Davos Speech

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has once again placed Greenland at the center of international attention, declaring during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos that he would not use force to obtain the strategically important Arctic territory. The remarks revived memories of Trump’s earlier attempts to explore U.S. acquisition of Greenland while attempting to soften concerns among European allies and global leaders.

Speaking to an audience of political and business elites, Trump framed his comments as part of a broader discussion on global security, economic cooperation, and U.S. strategic interests in the Arctic. His assertion that “I won’t use force” was widely interpreted as an effort to reassure Denmark and other European partners who have previously reacted sharply to any suggestion of American control over Greenland.

Despite the reassurance, the comments have reignited debate over U.S. ambitions in the Arctic and the limits of presidential rhetoric in shaping foreign policy narratives.

A Controversy That Refuses to Fade

Trump’s interest in Greenland is not new. During his presidency, reports that the United States had explored the possibility of purchasing the territory sparked diplomatic backlash from Denmark, which governs Greenland as an autonomous region. Danish officials at the time dismissed the idea as unrealistic, while Greenlandic leaders emphasized their right to self-determination.

Although Trump later canceled a planned visit to Denmark following criticism, the episode left a lasting impression on transatlantic relations. His Davos remarks show that the issue remains part of his geopolitical thinking, even as he attempts to present it in less confrontational terms.

By stressing that he would not use military force, Trump appeared to acknowledge the sensitivity of the topic and the importance of avoiding language that could escalate diplomatic tensions.

Why Greenland Matters

Greenland holds immense strategic value due to its location in the Arctic, its natural resources, and its proximity to emerging shipping routes as ice continues to melt. The island is also home to a key U.S. military base, making it an important component of American and NATO defense planning.

As climate change reshapes the Arctic, global powers including the United States, Russia, and China are increasingly focused on the region. This has elevated Greenland’s geopolitical importance and made any discussion of its future highly charged.

Trump’s comments at Davos reflect these broader strategic considerations, even as they tread into politically sensitive territory.

Reassurance or Political Messaging?

While Trump’s statement that he would not use force may sound conciliatory, critics argue that the very act of revisiting the idea undermines trust. European officials and analysts note that repeated references to Greenland’s acquisition—even without force—risk unsettling diplomatic relationships.

Supporters, however, argue that Trump was simply speaking candidly about U.S. strategic interests while making clear that he respects international norms. They see the remarks as an attempt to balance assertiveness with restraint, a hallmark of Trump’s unconventional diplomatic style.

The mixed reactions highlight the challenge Trump faces in communicating policy positions that are both bold and reassuring.

European and Greenlandic Reactions

European leaders have so far responded cautiously, emphasizing that Greenland is not for sale and that its future should be decided by its people. Greenlandic officials have consistently stated that they welcome cooperation with the United States but reject any notion of external control.

For many in Europe, Trump’s Davos comments served as a reminder of past tensions rather than a fresh proposal. Diplomatic observers note that while the tone may have softened, the underlying message continues to raise concerns about respect for sovereignty.

At the same time, Greenland’s leaders have used the renewed attention to highlight the island’s growing role in global affairs and their desire for greater international engagement on their own terms.

The Davos Context

Trump’s appearance at Davos was closely watched for clues about his foreign policy outlook and how he positions himself on the world stage. The forum, known for its emphasis on global cooperation, provided a high-profile platform for Trump to address contentious topics.

By stating that he would not use force, Trump appeared to align his message with Davos themes of dialogue and stability. However, his remarks also underscored how his approach often blends reassurance with provocation, keeping audiences guessing about his true intentions.

The Greenland comment became one of the most widely discussed moments of his speech, overshadowing other policy points.

Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy

Although Trump is no longer in office, his statements continue to influence political debate in the United States and abroad. Should he return to power, questions about his approach to alliances, territorial interests, and international norms would once again take center stage.

The Greenland issue, symbolic as it may be, reflects larger concerns about how the U.S. balances strategic ambition with diplomatic sensitivity. Analysts warn that even hypothetical discussions of acquiring territory can strain alliances at a time when unity is seen as critical in addressing global challenges.

For now, Trump’s comments serve as a reminder that rhetoric alone can have significant diplomatic consequences.