The Third Day: The Soul’s Resurrection
The Rise of the New Human
Day One:
The soul descended.
It agreed to forget, to fracture, to bleed.
To walk among the sleeping and call that living.
It learned the language of hunger —
the need to be seen, the ache to be loved,
the terror of being nothing at all.
It learned how silence could be a weapon,
how love could vanish into shadows,
how the body could betray the mind
and the mind betray the heart.
And God watched from within the marrow,
silent but not absent,
whispering through pain: keep going.
Even when every step felt broken,
even when the eyes could not hold light,
the whisper persisted.
Day Two:
The illusion began to rot.
Pleasure turned to poison,
truth twisted into theatre,
and every promise rang hollow.
The sacred feminine was burned for beauty,
the sacred masculine for power,
and the children of earth forgot the language of the heart.
The soul tried everything:
addiction, devotion, denial, salvation,
searching every mirror for the face of God.
Every reflection fractured,
shards of light and shadow scattered across the floor,
but still the whisper said: keep going.
It learned how to walk through fire
and not be consumed,
how to drink bitterness as water
and not lose the taste of sweetness.
Day Three:
The soul survived the binge of pain.
It drank illusion to the dregs
and found no nourishment there.
It lay in the wreckage of what once glittered,
and for a long time it could not tell dream from death,
self from shadow,
hope from hollow.
But on the third day, the silence changed.
A single breath of light entered the chamber,
gentle as wind through a cathedral.
The body stirred — not yet whole,
but remembering.
Every cell began to hum the old language of truth.
Every pulse spoke of ancient rhythm and fire.
The heart whispered to the spine,
and the spine whispered to the soul: rise.
This is the hour between worlds,
when the spirit, still trembling, chooses to rise.
It does not need certainty.
It only needs willingness.
The soul survived the binge of pain,
and now the light begins to feed it.
What was lost becomes luminous,
what was buried becomes holy.
Shadows bend toward illumination,
and the echoes of suffering are tempered into wisdom.
Beyond the Third Day:
The soul begins again — but different.
No longer chasing heaven,
it carries heaven in its bloodstream.
No longer seeking God,
it breathes as God in motion.
It walks the earth with new eyes,
seeing beauty even in bruises,
hearing music in the machinery of sorrow.
It speaks gently to its past,
forgiving what could not yet love itself.
It teaches without words,
heals without ceremony,
shines without demand.
This is the resurrection not of one,
but of the many —
the rise of the radiant human,
born from shadow and flame,
crowned in compassion,
armed with clarity,
and carrying a heart that is both tender and fierce.
And so it is:
Day Three becomes Forever.
The soul walks in gold.
The body is a temple,
the mind a mirror,
the spirit a torch.
The new world begins within.
The fire is alive.
The light is unbroken.
The soul remembers itself — complete, sovereign, eternal.
About the Creator
THE HONED CRONE
Sacred survivor, mythic storyteller, and prophet of the risen feminine. I turn grief, rage, and trauma into art, ritual, and words that ignite courage, truth, and divine power in others.
Keep reading
More stories from THE HONED CRONE and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
Rage, Truth, and Survival
The Compass of the Survivor It is often said that anger is destructive. That rage leads only to chaos. But what they do not understand is that anger is truth in motion. For those of us who have been violated, manipulated, and robbed—emotionally, spiritually, financially—rage becomes a compass. It points directly to the wounds the world has ignored, to the lies that have been tolerated, to the injustices no system dares to acknowledge. Rage is the pulse of awareness, the fire that refuses to be extinguished.
By THE HONED CRONE2 months ago in The Swamp
Gaza Under Fire as Israel Says It Targeted an “Imminent Threat”
Tensions in the Middle East have once again surged as Israeli forces carried out strikes in Gaza, with Israeli officials stating the operation was aimed at neutralizing an “imminent threat.” The attack has reignited fears of a wider escalation, drawing international concern and renewed scrutiny over the fragile balance between security claims and humanitarian consequences. As airstrikes shook parts of Gaza, questions quickly emerged: What constituted the alleged imminent threat? Was the response proportionate? And what does this latest episode mean for civilians trapped in a territory already devastated by years of conflict, blockade, and political paralysis? Israel’s Justification: Preventing an Immediate Attack According to Israeli military and government statements, the strikes were launched to preempt an imminent attack planned by militant groups operating in Gaza. Israeli officials emphasized that intelligence indicated preparations for assaults targeting Israeli civilians or military positions, leaving what they described as “no alternative but to act.” Israel has long maintained a doctrine of preemptive self-defense, arguing that rapid action is necessary to protect its population from rocket fire, cross-border attacks, and other security threats. In official briefings, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) framed the strikes as precise and targeted, aimed at militant infrastructure rather than civilians. This justification aligns with Israel’s broader security narrative: that Gaza-based armed groups pose a continuous and unpredictable danger, and that delayed responses could result in mass casualties inside Israel. Gaza’s Reality: Civilians Pay the Highest Price While Israel stressed security imperatives, the reality on the ground in Gaza told a different story. Local health officials reported casualties, including women and children, and damage to residential areas. Even when strikes are aimed at specific targets, Gaza’s dense urban environment makes civilian harm difficult to avoid. For Gaza’s more than two million residents, most of whom live under severe economic hardship, each escalation deepens an already dire humanitarian situation. Hospitals operate with limited supplies, electricity is scarce, and access to clean water remains inconsistent. Airstrikes, even short-lived ones, strain a system that many international organizations describe as on the brink of collapse. Residents described nights filled with fear, explosions, and uncertainty — a grim routine that has become painfully familiar. The Question of “Imminent Threat” The phrase “imminent threat” carries significant weight in international law and diplomacy. While states have the right to self-defense, that right is bound by principles of necessity and proportionality. Critics argue that Israel’s repeated reliance on classified intelligence makes independent verification difficult. Human rights groups often call for transparency, insisting that claims of imminent danger should be scrutinized, particularly when civilian lives are lost. Supporters of Israel counter that intelligence disclosures could compromise sources and methods, potentially enabling future attacks. This tension between secrecy and accountability lies at the heart of the ongoing debate. International Reactions: Calls for Restraint The latest strikes prompted swift responses from the international community. Several governments urged restraint on all sides, warning that continued escalation could spiral into a broader conflict. The United Nations reiterated its concern over civilian casualties and emphasized the need to respect international humanitarian law. Aid organizations once again called for humanitarian corridors and protection for civilians, stressing that Gaza’s population cannot endure endless cycles of violence. At the same time, some allies reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself, highlighting the persistent threat posed by armed groups in Gaza. This familiar diplomatic split reflects the broader global divide over how the conflict should be addressed. A Cycle That Feels Impossible to Break The latest violence fits into a long-standing pattern: attacks, retaliation, international alarm, and a temporary lull — followed by renewed tensions. Each round hardens positions and deepens mistrust. For Palestinians in Gaza, the sense of collective punishment remains strong. Many argue that regardless of militant activity, civilians bear the brunt of military actions over which they have little control. For Israelis, years of rocket attacks and security threats reinforce the belief that decisive military action is necessary for survival. This cycle leaves little room for political solutions, while reinforcing narratives of fear and victimhood on both sides. The Political Context Behind the Strikes Military escalations rarely occur in a vacuum. Analysts point out that internal political pressures, regional dynamics, and broader geopolitical shifts often influence timing and intensity. In Israel, security issues are deeply intertwined with domestic politics, where leaders are frequently judged on their ability to appear strong against perceived threats. In Gaza, militant groups operate within a complex political landscape shaped by rivalry, blockade, and regional alliances. These factors make de-escalation difficult, even when neither side appears eager for a full-scale war. Humanitarian Law and Moral Responsibility Beyond strategic calculations, the situation raises profound moral questions. International humanitarian law demands the protection of civilians and the minimization of harm, even in the context of self-defense. Human rights organizations continue to document casualties and destruction, calling for independent investigations into each escalation. They argue that accountability — for all parties — is essential if future violence is to be prevented. Without such accountability, critics warn, the concept of “imminent threat” risks becoming a justification that normalizes repeated civilian suffering. What Comes Next? As of now, the situation remains tense but uncertain. History suggests that short-term calm may follow, but without addressing the underlying causes — blockade, political fragmentation, security fears, and the absence of a credible peace process — lasting stability remains elusive. For Gaza’s civilians, each strike reinforces a sense of abandonment by the international community. For Israelis, ongoing threats reinforce the belief that vigilance and force are unavoidable. Conclusion The latest strikes on Gaza, justified by Israel as targeting an imminent threat, once again highlight the fragile and volatile nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Security claims, humanitarian realities, and political calculations collide in a space where civilians are caught in the middle. Until meaningful political solutions replace military reactions, Gaza will remain a flashpoint — and the phrase “imminent threat” will continue to echo after each explosion, long after the smoke clears.
By Muhammad Hassan7 days ago in The Swamp
The steps to losing a child
Step One: Lose a child. Not what anyone wants to happen and nothing you can do to change it, but you can go through steps to becoming happy again. You can go through steps to loving again. You can go through steps to become a new you because after losing a child you will never be the same person you once were.
By Tabitha Hinkley4 days ago in Fiction
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.