NexQloud Exposed: Legal Threats and Fake Tech From a Suspected Crypto Scam
An exposé into a crypto platform using unverifiable tech claims and legal pressure to silence critics
This article investigates NexQloud, a crypto-linked platform that claims to offer cutting-edge cloud infrastructure powered by devices it calls “NanoServers.” What began as a routine blog post raising questions about the company’s bold claims quickly escalated into legal threats from the New Zealand-based law firm Bell Gully, acting on NexQloud’s behalf.
Let’s unpack the issues at play — from the marketing exaggerations and suspicious infrastructure claims, to the attempted silencing of public criticism.
What Is NexQloud Promising?
NexQloud markets itself as the future of decentralized cloud computing. At the center of their pitch is a device they call the NanoServer — allegedly capable of delivering enterprise-grade computing performance using a mobile CPU architecture, all while consuming just 12% of the power traditional data centers require.
They claim to have deployed over 1,850 NanoServers across ten countries, delivering 54,820 virtual CPUs and 159 terabytes of RAM.
These are impressive numbers — but there’s a problem: none of it has been independently verified.
There are:
• No published benchmarks
• No audits from third-party cloud specialists
• No listed enterprise clients
• No case studies or customer testimonials
In other words, NexQloud is making big promises without producing the evidence to back them up.
The NanoServer: Revolutionary or Repurposed?
The term “NanoServer” has no official meaning in enterprise computing. NexQloud appears to be using it to describe a consumer-grade desktop or virtual server. These machines are unlikely to deliver the kind of performance or efficiency claimed — especially at scale.
Their legal team insists these devices deliver the equivalent throughput of full data center servers with vastly reduced energy consumption. If true, this would represent a breakthrough in cloud technology. Yet, no global tech firm is using them, and no patent or peer-reviewed technical material is available to support the claim.
The likely reality? Repurposed low-end machines marketed with exaggerated performance figures.
Suspicious Infrastructure Claims
NexQloud states that it has active Distributed Kubernetes Services (DKS) operating in Virginia, Ohio, and other regions. They reference “public applications” running on their cloud — yet no customers are named, no workloads are shared, and no usage data is made public.
This kind of vague positioning is typical of projects that generate hype through buzzwords rather than transparency.
Mining Capabilities That Don’t Add Up
The platform also promotes its NanoServers as capable of mining crypto assets. However, legitimate mining requires ASICs or high-performance GPUs. The devices shown in NexQloud’s materials do not meet those criteria.
This raises the possibility that investor returns are not driven by utility or demand — but potentially by internal token dynamics or user recruitment.
The Legal Threats from Bell Gully
After publishing a blog post critically examining NexQloud’s claims, I received two legal letters from Bell Gully, authored by partner Tania Goatley. Both letters accused me of defamation and demanded:
• Retraction of the article
• A public apology
• Payment of $5,000 NZD in “compensation”
The second letter added that my follow-up YouTube response video also constituted defamation, despite offering no technical rebuttal or evidence to counter the concerns raised.
Who Is Tania Goatley?
Tania Goatley is a senior media lawyer with experience in defamation and reputation management. Her involvement with NexQloud appears to be centered on mitigating reputational damage rather than engaging with the underlying concerns raised by the public or press.
Instead of encouraging transparency from her client, Ms. Goatley’s approach appears to prioritize legal suppression of criticism — a troubling sign for anyone who values open discussion about financial and technological risks.
Are Their Media Mentions Really Independent?
NexQloud’s legal team references articles from Yahoo Finance, TechTimes, Forbes Georgia, and BeInCrypto as independent media verification.
Upon closer inspection:
• Many are labeled as “sponsored content”
• Some list no author
• Others appear to be republished press releases
For example, the Forbes Georgia article is clearly marked as a paid placement. The BeInCrypto piece is credited to “Advertorial.” None of these outlets provide independent investigative journalism, and all appear to be paid PR content, not credible endorsements.
Our Response to the Legal Threats
In response to the legal letters, I issued formal replies stating:
• The article was based entirely on publicly available claims
• No false information was presented as fact
• The content is protected under New Zealand’s Bill of Rights, particularly regarding public interest commentary
I refused to retract or pay any compensation.
Why This Matters
The public has a right to ask questions — especially when a company:
• Claims unverified technological breakthroughs
• Uses legal intimidation rather than open dialogue
• Targets mum-and-dad investors with promises of passive income from mystery machines
When bold marketing meets vague technology and legal pressure, investigative journalism becomes essential.
Call to Action
If you are considering investing in NexQloud or promoting its platform, ask for third-party validation. Demand technical audits. Look for real clients. And be cautious of any opportunity that rewards promotion over product.
If you’ve already been affected or pressured by NexQloud’s tactics, I encourage you to come forward — publicly or privately. Your story matters.
Disclaimer: This article includes commentary on public claims made by NexQloud and its legal representatives. It has been independently written by the author and reviewed for accuracy. Parts of this article were assisted by AI tools for formatting and editing support, in compliance with Vocal’s editorial
About the Creator
DANNY DE HEK
NYT Featured Investigative Journalist | OSINT | Cult Survivor | Exposing Scams, Ponzi Schemes & MLMs | I Name & Shame the Bad Actors Behind the Lies | Known as The Crypto Ponzi Scheme Avenger | Relentlessly Exposing Fraud & Deception
Keep reading
More stories from DANNY DE HEK and writers in The Swamp and other communities.
ECC Approves Over Rs. 7 Billion Funds for Armed Forces: What It Means for National Security and the Economy
Pakistan’s Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) has approved over Rs. 7 billion in additional funds for the armed forces, a move that underscores the government’s continued focus on national security amid evolving regional and internal challenges. While defense spending often sparks debate, this latest approval reflects broader realities related to preparedness, modernization, and the economic pressures faced by security institutions in a changing geopolitical environment. Understanding the ECC’s Role The Economic Coordination Committee, a key body within Pakistan’s federal government, is responsible for approving major financial decisions, particularly those that fall outside the scope of the annual budget. ECC approvals typically address urgent or unforeseen expenditures, making this allocation especially significant. According to official briefings, the newly approved funds are meant to cover operational requirements, logistical needs, and critical expenditures faced by the armed forces. These allocations are not unusual, particularly in times when inflation, currency depreciation, and rising global costs increase the financial burden on state institutions. Why Additional Funding Was Needed Several factors contributed to the need for this supplementary funding: Rising operational costs due to inflation and higher fuel prices Maintenance and logistics expenses for equipment and infrastructure Border security and counterterrorism operations, which require sustained financial support Welfare and allowances for military personnel affected by economic pressures Defense analysts note that while Pakistan’s defense budget is allocated annually, economic volatility often creates gaps that must be filled through ECC intervention to avoid disruptions in critical operations. Regional Security Environment The approval comes at a time when regional security dynamics remain complex. Tensions in South Asia, instability in neighboring regions, and global conflicts have reshaped military planning worldwide. For Pakistan, maintaining readiness across land, air, and maritime domains remains a strategic priority. Security experts argue that adequate funding is essential not just for combat readiness, but also for intelligence coordination, disaster response, and peacekeeping commitments. Pakistan’s armed forces frequently play a role in humanitarian relief efforts, from flood response to earthquake recovery, which also require financial resources. Economic Concerns and Public Debate Defense spending in Pakistan often raises questions, especially during periods of economic strain. Critics argue that funds should be prioritized for healthcare, education, and social welfare, while supporters counter that national security is a prerequisite for economic stability. Economists emphasize that ECC approvals do not necessarily mean a permanent increase in defense spending. Instead, they often serve as short-term financial adjustments to ensure continuity. Transparency in how these funds are utilized will be key in maintaining public trust. Impact on Civil-Military Balance The ECC’s decision also reflects the institutional relationship between civilian leadership and the military. Budgetary approvals through civilian forums reinforce constitutional processes and demonstrate oversight mechanisms at work. Observers note that such approvals, when handled transparently, can strengthen democratic governance by ensuring that defense needs are met within a structured financial framework, rather than through ad-hoc arrangements. Broader Implications Beyond immediate military needs, the funding decision has broader implications: Defense preparedness may enhance deterrence and stability Local defense industries could benefit if funds support procurement or maintenance International partners and lenders will watch closely, as defense spending often factors into economic assessments Balancing defense requirements with fiscal responsibility remains a delicate task, especially as Pakistan navigates IMF commitments and economic reforms. Looking Ahead The approval of over Rs. 7 billion for the armed forces highlights the constant balancing act between security and economic management. As Pakistan moves forward, policymakers will face continued pressure to justify defense-related expenditures while addressing public concerns over inflation, employment, and development. For now, the ECC’s decision signals that the government views security readiness as non-negotiable, even in challenging economic times. The real test will lie in how effectively these funds are utilized and whether long-term planning can reduce the need for repeated supplementary approvals.
By Fiaz Ahmed Brohi5 days ago in The Swamp
Comments
There are no comments for this story
Be the first to respond and start the conversation.